If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Is it "Child Support" or money for spouse-the answer is still yes
"abdd" wrote in message ... What makes me feel even more stupid is when I get the kids for a full month. It cost me a fortune on airfare to fly them to my place. On top of that I still have to pay the X the CS money even though I had them that full month. OK I supported them that month why do I have to pay her? This is bizarre to me but I was force to do the exact same thing. Ex doesn't even allow my child to pack a bag, "You can get her whatever she needs". And yet government deadly force is used to xfer money from me to the ex for that month. Some states allow CS reduction for "visits" over 30 days. Florida does. Have you checked your state's statutes? And by design, no doubt, judges never happen to include visitations longer than 30 days in their orders in such states, duh! Here it is 120 nights/year and the standard visitation package happens to come out to, surprise, 112 nights. So in addition to back-door alimony the women gets paid for 112 days for children not being supported. Such a sweet deal! Not for the children though. Not for men though. But for the people seen as counting. Wake up people! This is simply another government vote buying scheme so such irrationalities are not mistakes or oversights. Trying to fix them is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic! === Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it. === ==== |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Is it "Child Support" or money for spouse-the answer is still yes
This is simply another government vote buying scheme
Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it. And I suppose the French peasants starving for a lack of bread could just eat cake? When in history has political oppression been overturned at the polls? South African apartheid? Iraq Bathists? America's Jim Crow? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Is it "Child Support" or money for spouse-the answer is still yes
"abdd" wrote in message ... This is simply another government vote buying scheme Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it. And I suppose the French peasants starving for a lack of bread could just eat cake? Yes, that was the point of the saying.........free hint "cake" as it was originally spoken in that line, was not the confectionary refered to today. When in history has political oppression been overturned at the polls? South African apartheid? Iraq Bathists? America's Jim Crow? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Is it "Child Support" or money for spouse-the answer is still yes
"abdd" wrote in message ... This is simply another government vote buying scheme Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it. And I suppose the French peasants starving for a lack of bread could just eat cake? When in history has political oppression been overturned at the polls? South African apartheid? Iraq Bathists? America's Jim Crow? === Fine. Don't vote. Just sit around and whine about how powerless you are because women vote more than men and had their political oppression overturned at the polls. Doesn't matter to me. I'm a woman and I vote. === |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Children REALLY React To Control | Chris | Solutions | 437 | July 11th 04 02:38 AM |
488545670230 money 488545670230 | RASCH | Child Support | 0 | February 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Money, Honey | RRob888372 | Single Parents | 0 | November 22nd 03 04:45 PM |
KIDS EARNING MONEY | Dargentala | General | 0 | August 1st 03 02:43 PM |
Money money money... | russell barr | General | 0 | August 1st 03 01:23 PM |