Is it "Child Support" or money for spouse

"abdd" wrote in message
...
What makes me feel even more stupid is when I get the kids
for a full month. It cost me a fortune on airfare to fly them to my
place. On top of that I still have to pay the X the CS money even
though I had them that full month. OK I supported them that month why
do I have to pay her?

This is bizarre to me but I was force to do the exact same thing. Ex
doesn't even allow my child to pack a bag, "You can get her whatever
she needs". And yet government deadly force is used to xfer money from
me to the ex for that month.

Some states allow CS reduction for "visits" over 30 days. Florida does.
Have you checked your state's statutes?

And by design, no doubt, judges never happen to include visitations longer
than 30 days in their orders in such states, duh! Here it is 120
nights/year
and the standard visitation package happens to come out to, surprise, 112
nights.
So in addition to back-door alimony the women gets paid for 112 days for
children not being supported. Such a sweet deal! Not for the children
though.
Not for men though. But for the people seen as counting.

Wake up people! This is simply another government vote buying scheme
so such irrationalities are not mistakes or oversights. Trying to
fix them is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic!
===
Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it.
===
====

This is simply another government vote buying scheme

Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it.

And I suppose the French peasants starving for a lack of
bread could just eat cake?

When in history has political oppression been overturned
at the polls? South African apartheid? Iraq Bathists?
America's Jim Crow?

"abdd" wrote in message
...
This is simply another government vote buying scheme

Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it.

And I suppose the French peasants starving for a lack of
bread could just eat cake?

Yes, that was the point of the saying.........free hint "cake" as it was
originally spoken in that line, was not the confectionary refered to today.



When in history has political oppression been overturned
at the polls? South African apartheid? Iraq Bathists?
America's Jim Crow?

"abdd" wrote in message
...
This is simply another government vote buying scheme

Well, you could vote instead of just letting the women do it.

And I suppose the French peasants starving for a lack of
bread could just eat cake?

When in history has political oppression been overturned
at the polls? South African apartheid? Iraq Bathists?
America's Jim Crow?
===
Fine. Don't vote. Just sit around and whine about how powerless you are
because
women vote more than men and had their political oppression overturned at
the polls.
Doesn't matter to me. I'm a woman and I vote.
===