If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom?
By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
I have mixed feelings about this one.
I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but maybe the person is ticked off because Britney isn't under intense CPS supervision already. If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap, CPS would have done a child removal. If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. WHY should Britney get special treatment? On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote: Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom? By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
I have mixed feelings about this one.
I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but maybe the person is ticked off because Britney isn't under intense CPS supervision already. If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap, CPS would have done a child removal. If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. WHY should Britney get special treatment? On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote: Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom? By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
Greegor wrote:
I have mixed feelings about this one. I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but maybe the person is ticked off because Britney isn't under intense CPS supervision already. If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap, CPS would have done a child removal. If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. WHY should Britney get special treatment? CPS preys on the poor folk. Imagine all the desperate reporters that would make it front page news - and delirious tween zombies screeching online and off - not to mention Britney can afford lawyers, lots of lawyers. CPS don't want lawyers and headlines - they go for the easy money - poor folk who can't defend themselves. On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote: Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom? By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
American Greed wrote:
Greegor wrote: I have mixed feelings about this one. I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but maybe the person is ticked off because Britney isn't under intense CPS supervision already. If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap, CPS would have done a child removal. If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. WHY should Britney get special treatment? CPS preys on the poor folk. Paula Poundstone is poor? She even LOST her foster children. And her adopted child or children were removed from her custody and placed in foster care. Oh wait, she's an out lesbian. How do you feel about her losing her kids knowing that? She likely was going to adopt more. And was very attached to her foster children, and they to her. She came close to losing her adopted child as well, and she, as Greg claimed in the prior post, HAD HER CHILD USED TO EXTORT HER INTO A SERVICE PLAN, ETC. Paula, the comedian in poverty? Why didn't SHE walk free? If you bothered to read up on Brittany, and this case, you'd find that much of the bull**** about this was urban legend. Didn't happen. Imagine all the desperate reporters that would make it front page news - and delirious tween zombies screeching online and off - not to mention Britney can afford lawyers, lots of lawyers. Your imagination has run away with you. CPS don't want lawyers and headlines - Odd, that would tend to be MORE in their favor. It would make them appear even MORE evenhanded. Your logic is as usual, Dennis, up your ass about three feet. Along with your head. 0:] they go for the easy money - poor folk who can't defend themselves. Easy money? Dennis, as YOU know so well, they BILL THE PARENTS FOR OUT OF HOME CARE services. Now which do you suppose they are more likely to GET money for, if they bill, eh? Did you have to pay for your kids foster care bill? Have they managed to collect yet? R R R R R On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote: Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom? By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
American Greed wrote:
"....I got stuck up here taken another pic to post online when I ran across myself coming the other way and tried to turn around instead of back out. Lost my camera too. Dern ...." Dennis, I sent Greg to hunt for you. He's perfect for the job, considering the shape of his head. 0:] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
Greegor wrote:
I have mixed feelings about this one. Greg, don't you get it yet? You two are a village idiot act. No one gives a flying puck what your "feelings about" anything are. Because you are Most Often Wrong Hanson, the idiot poster to Usenet. I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but maybe the person is ticked off because Britney isn't under intense CPS supervision already. Gee, you think this is important do you? And lends some support to Michael's lying bull**** signoff on his posts? Get a life, both of you. If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap, CPS would have done a child removal. Provide at least ONE citation of such an incident, dimbulb. The "normal person" would have gotten an LE cite, and nothing more. Now by the third incident or so (I believe there was a case in TX where the got ****ed and deliberately did it again to provoke the cop...who she knew) THEN CPS might get called. So, babbler, show us a citation for a single stop incident where the cop took the child and delivered it to CPS...go for it stupid. If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. Now you have one that might fly. But please explain how the behavior you just described would indicate a person is 'normal.' And why someone doing those things with a baby in tow they are responsible for would be being 'extort'[ed] to the services you mention? Are YOU, trying to PRETEND to tell US, Greg, that YOU haven't said yourself you have NO USE for druggies and the child SHOULD be removed? Wanna see your posts? Now, because you want to make a case...a non-existent one...against CPS, you suddenly have a change of heart? You think a person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS should NOT do a removal? WHY should Britney get special treatment? Well, could be that she meets the criteria for having respite for her child and uses it. It's the money, kiddo. You know, like you want so badly from the Iowa taxpayers for an alleged offense against you by CPS. .... CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. .... That's so cute I just had to copy and paste so we could read your babbling diatribe again. It's enough to replace my morning coffee for a pickmeup, Greg. Thanks. Michael is, as he always did, making a fool of himself with these pointless postings over his dishonest sig line. But you love it. Wallow in it, like a pig in ****. Happy grin on your face too. You and your cronies claim WE drove people away from this newsgroup...when the fact is ALL THE PEOPLE YOU ATTACK HERE ARE parents that prevailed against CPS and helped each other do so. You've been at this for years. Your persistence here strongly suggest YOU either are nutso, or you are a government agent yourself sent to disrupt family advocates that WIN in CPS cases. Can you explain your attacks? You just went after another one. Didn't you? Bringing up her posting to another news group as a way try and embarrass her. She did not do a damn thing to you, Greg, except post civilly to others here that you have targeted. Can you explain yourself? Or are you an agent? On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote: Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom? By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Britney Spears Stalker Calls Child Protective Services?
I have mixed feelings about this one.
I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but maybe the person is ticked off because Britney isn't under intense CPS supervision already. If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap, CPS would have done a child removal. If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in and out of rehab, shaved their head etc. CPS would have done a child removal, insisted on drug treatment and used the child to extort a service plan psych eval done by a psychologist beholden to them for income. WHY should Britney get special treatment? On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote: Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom? By Angela Carson Jul 13, 2007 http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway. She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the way she treats her kids. Lots of calls. *** But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the person that was calling is a nut. Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints against Spears. *** Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints were bogus -- and the matter was dropped. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Britney Spears Hottest Pictures | Sophi | Child Support | 0 | March 27th 07 01:22 PM |
Britney Spears had | time | Pregnancy | 12 | September 20th 05 04:45 PM |
Is Britney Spears Pregnant Yes or No | beckee | Pregnancy | 4 | April 14th 05 03:36 PM |