PAIN: Babies vs. The Intl Assoc for the Study of Pain (IASP)

PAIN: BABIES VS. THE INTL ASSOC FOR THE STUDY OF PAIN (IASP)

"The International Association for the Study of Pain® (IASP) is the
leading professional forum for science, practice, and education in the
field of pain...IASP has more than 6,900 members in 106 countries..."
http://www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template...ContentID=1608

In 1987, I discovered American MDs perpetuating phony "babies can't
feel pain" neurology as they ripped and sliced infant penises en masse
with no medical indication.

I called for an end to the mass child abuse and petitioned Congress
for an exemption from the child abuse statutes for the ancient Jewish
ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis...

Strange things happened...

See below.

OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below.

Allan I. Basbaum, PhD, FRS
Editor-in-Chief:
PAIN
http://www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template...ContentID=1223
VIA International Association for the Study of Pain/IASP
Secretariat
111 Queen Anne Avenue North
Suite 501
Seattle, WA 98109-4955
USA
Tel: +1-206-283-0311
Fax: +1-206-283-9403
Via

Allan,

I am assuming Sunny Anand is a member of IASP.

Will you please forward the email below to him? (His email bounced
from the address below.)

EMERGENCY: Most American male babies are still having their penises
senselessly ripped and sliced - in part because of Sunny's silence.

There is no medical indication and some babies die or lose the WHOLE
penis.

Other obvious crimes of American MDs are discussed below. For
example, MD-obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% and
KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get
stuck - as they SLICE VAGINAS en masse. See "Dents in babies'
skulls," URL below.

This insanity has to stop.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs
are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies.

The infant penis ripping and slicing should have ended BILLIONS of
dollars' worth of infant screams ago - back when I pointed out the
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.

Ending the screams now instantly saves America an estimated $400
million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE American males
can make for themselves in adulthood.

Please consider speaking out yourself to help end the MD crimes.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


Copied to:
Kathy Kreiter, IASP Executive Director

"Directs overall activities of IASP® Secretariat"

Kathy,

Please inform the IASP Secretariat...

LAW ENFORCEMENT IS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY...

Steve B. Harris, MD arrogantly BOASTS about law enforcement looking
the other way, as in,

"Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no
crime. These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them
to you."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
28866f3384801ae9

Copied also to other IASP staff: accounting@iasp-
;elizabeth@iasp-
;books@iasp-
@iasp-


PLEASE HELP STOP THE MASS CHILD ABUSE BY AMERICAN MDs...




----- Original Message -----
From: "Todd Gastaldo"
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 3:07 AM
Subject: Sunny Anand, 'sensorial saturation' and the tiniest 'raving
nutcases'


SUNNY ANAND, "SENSORIAL SATURATION" AND THE TINIEST "RAVING NUTCASES"

(For my Anand discussion and Bellieni et al.'s "Sensorial saturation for
neonatal analgesia" 2007 PubMed abstract, see the end of the post.)

(Copied to Bellieni et al. via ; copied to Anand via


THE TINIEST "RAVING NUTCASES"...

In my post, Attn AMA: Puncturing infant penises: 'More humane' is still not
humane
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...a2f65e85b8a33d

I noted that the AMA tried to make obvious child abuse "more humane" instead
of simply calling for an end to it...

I WROTE:


RUPERT BEAR (see below) thinks that puncturing an infant penis before
ripping and slicing off half the skin is not child abuse.

Rupert Bear also thinks, in effect, that there is no pain when the
anesthesia is injected and that there is no pain when a baby urinates
into a senseless wound on his penis...

Wrong.

RUPERT BEAR REPLIED...


So an injection is child abuse? Boy you are really a raving nutcase.


#### Rupert, the infant penis ripping and slicing is OBVIOUS child abuse.
Performing injections to try to anesthetize the pain just adds to the
obvious crime.

#### REMEMBER:

"[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an -acknowledged
hazard to health." [Michael Katz, MD: Letter. AJDC, 1980]

"[M]ore than one-half of the skin and mucosa of the penis is excised..."
http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/30/3/237#411

#### Rarely, babies die or lose the WHOLE penis

#### There is NO medical reason to subject children to these risks - let
alone subject them to the pain.

#### Even if there is "almost complete analgesia" (see sensorial saturation
below), the infant penis has been ripped and sliced for no medical reason.
A mutilation/child abuse has occurred - and there are lingering pain
effects.

#### As you noted....

For the few days that the glans may be considered "raw" there are any
number of means available to reduce discomfort due to contact with
urine. Vaseline is one.


#### It is not just the recently ripped glans that is raw. There is also
the circular wound created when infant foreskin forming the preputial niche
is sliced off. While it is good to try to relieve this pain, it is
unnecessary pain - a lingering effect of the child abuse.

I WROTE:


Pain inflicted before the ripping and slicing off half the skin - and
pain experienced after the ripping and slicing off half the skin - are
just as much child abuse as the ripping and slicing itself.

RUPERT BEAR REPLIED...


But dear crazy guy, due to the use of injected medication there is no
pain during your "ripping and slicing" of the foreskin. So why to you
continue to lie and exaggerate so wildly?

#### It is MDs who lied and exaggerated wildly - using phony "babies can't
feel pain" neurology. I am only pointing out the lies and replacing medical
euphemism ("routine infant circumcision") with graphic description ("mass
infant penis ripping and slicing").

#### Obviously, proponents of the mass infant penis ripping and slicing are
going to prefer to stick with medical euphemism as they issue forth with ad
hominem - PRETENDING that injecting anesthetic makes the child
abuse/mutilation legal; and pretending also that the pain after the ripping
and slicing is of no consequence.

#### Meanwhile, for a while longer, law enforcement will fail to enforce the
law - and people like Steve Harris, MD will arrogantly BOAST about law
enforcement failing to enforce the law, as in,

"Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime.
These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
28866f3384801ae9

#### Dr. Harris was "responding" to my point that MDs are committing obvious
vaccination promotion fraud.

#### For discussion of the obvious vaccination promotion fraud...

See The F Crime: Arkansas State Board of Health President Karen
Konarski-Hart, DC
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/4352


#### BTW, the just mentioned "F crime" is another obvious medical
crime: Municipal chemotherapists - the vast majority of them
unlicensed - are still forcing Americans to drink water medicated with
FSA/fluoride, arsenic and lead.




Isn't it interesting how when a psychosexually motivated foreskin crazed
lunatic is called out that


##### Your "psychosexually motivated foreskin crazed lunatic" ad hominem is
noted.

SPEAKING OF "PSYCHOSEXUALLY MOTIVATED"...

#### Two MDs have noted that some MDs derive sexual gratification from
infant suffering...

#### John M. Foley, M.D. in The unkindest cut of all. Fact
1966;3(4):2-9:

"I have seen two medical students fight over the privilege of doing
circumcision on the newborn, although these same students showed neither
interest nor aptitude for opening boils or doing other surgical tasks.


"In 1951, I witnessed an autopsy on an infant who had died from an infected
circumcision -- a death rendered even more tragic because the mother had
tried to persuade the obstetrician to spare her infant this ordeal.


"Dr. Alexander Schaffer, a noted pediatrician, tells with horror the case in
which an infant was being delivered as a frank breech (buttocks first).
Before delivering the baby, and just as the penis came into view, the
obstetrician seized it and circumcised it. That obstetrician, I would say,
may be capable. He may be an all-round fine fellow. But sexually I say he is
a monster. And I say that one of the reasons why circumcision is so common
in this country stems from the sadism of the crypto-pervert..."
http://www.cirp.org/news/1966.07_Foley/


he does an immediate flip flop on his line.


#### Please supply substantive criticism with your ad hominem. Where is the
flip flop?

From slavating over the thought sof "ripping and slicing" he now
switched without missing a beat to needle stick pain like the child
exeriences from shots as if it is the worst possible thing in the world.


##### You yourself are missing a beat - perhaps intentionally. There is NO
medical indication. ANY pain inflicted with no medical indication is child
abuse - as is the lingering pain from the infant penis ripping and slicing
wounds. See above.

##### I SAY AGAIN...

"[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an -acknowledged
hazard to health." [Michael Katz, MD: Letter. AJDC, 1980]

"[M]ore than one-half of the skin and mucosa of the penis is excised..."
http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/30/3/237#411

#### Rarely, babies die or lose the WHOLE penis

#### There is NO medical reason to subject children to these risks - let
alone subject them to the pain.

#### The grisly infant surgery should have ended BILLIONS of infant screams
ago - back in 1987 when I pointed out that American medicine was
perpetuating phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology as MDs ripped and
sliced infant penises en masse with no medical indication.

See HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland, AAP and infant circumcision
revisited
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...c7261a4aafff5a

#### A few years after I called for a religious exemption from the child
abuse statutes for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the
foreskin on the penis...

#### American pediatricians came out against ALL religious exemptions and in
favor of anonymity for perpetrators of child abuse.

#### Later, American pediatricians fraudulently EQUATED their grisly total
foreskin amputation ritual with the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most
of the foreskin on the penis.

See Pediatrician 'ethics' (Attn: Gesundheit et al.)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com /group/chiro-list/message/2908

See also: Why the infant penis has a 'floppy tip' (Rip and slice vs. Slice
and rip)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...ee28d7cde3999b

#### There are STILL no medical indications for American medicine's total
foreskin amputation ritual. Ending the grisly infant surgery instantly
saves America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVES the surgery
as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood.

#### Rupert Bear offered further ad hominem...

Why do they allow internet access at mental homes in Oregan?


##### I have no idea whether they allow internet access at mental health
facilities in Oregon. Your ad hominem is again noted.

SENSORIAL SATURATION

##### If sensorial saturation is as easy and effective as the authors state,
let us hope the practice spreads rapidly...

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Oct;44(10):841-5. Epub 2006 Sep 16. Links
Neonatal pain analyzer: development and validation.
Sisto R,
Bellieni CV,
Perrone S,
Buonocore G.
Department of Occupational Health, ISPESL, Monteporzio Catone (Rome), Italy.
We developed a pain analyzer (ABC analyzer) to perform automatic acoustic
analysis of neonatal crying and to provide an objective estimate of neonatal
pain. The ABC analyzer uses a validated pain scale (ABC scale) based on
three acoustic parameters: pitch frequency, normalized RMS amplitude, and
presence of a characteristic frequency- and amplitude-modulated crying
feature, defined as "siren cry". Here we assessed the reliability of the
analyzer. We enrolled 57 healthy neonates. Each baby was recorded with a
video camera during heel prick. Pain intensity was evaluated using a
validated scale [Douleur Aigue du Nouveau-Ne (DAN) scale] and the analyzer
and the two scores were compared. We found a statistically significant
concordance between the DAN score and ABC analyzer score (p 0.0001). The
ABC analyser is a novel approach to cry analysis that should now have its
properties carefully evaluated in a series of studies, just as is necessary
in the development of any other pain measurement tool.

JUST MONTHS after saying that their ABC analyser "should now have its
properties carefully evaluated"...

Some of the same authors are using their ABC analyser to cause SENSORIAL
SATURATION - "almost complete analgesia" in babies...

Clin J Pain. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(3):219-21.
Sensorial saturation for neonatal analgesia.
Bellieni CV,
Cordelli DM,
Marchi S,
Ceccarelli S,
Perrone S,
Maffei M,
Buonocore G.
Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University
of Siena, Italy.
AIM: Sensorial saturation (SS) is a procedure in which touch, massage,
taste, voice, smell, and sight compete with pain, producing almost complete
analgesia during heel prick in neonates. SS is an apparently complex
maneuvre, but when correctly explained it is easily learnt. In the present
paper, we studied its feasibility, assessing whether a long training is
really needed to achieve good results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 66
consecutive babies and divided them randomly into 3 groups which received
the following forms of analgesia: glucose plus sucking (A), SS performed by
nurses (B), SS performed by mothers (C). We did not use perfume on the
caregivers' hands, so that babies could smell the natural scent of the
hands. We assessed pain level by the ABC scale. RESULTS: Median scores of
groups A, B, and C we 1 (0 to 6), 0 (0 to 4), and 0 (0 to 6),
respectively. Mean scores we 0.6, 0.6, and 1.7 and standard errors were
0.38, 0.22, and 0.32, respectively. Scores of groups B and C were
significantly lower than that of A (P=0.03 and 0.006, respectively). No
significant difference was found between values of scores of groups B and C.
CONCLUSIONS: Even without the use of perfume on the hands, SS was effective
as an analgesic maneuvre. It made no difference whether SS was performed by
mothers who applied it for the first time or experienced nurses. SS is rapid
to learn and any caregiver (mother, pediatrician or nurse) can effectively
use it.

#### Again, if sensorial saturation is as easy and effective as the authors
state, let us hope the practice spreads rapidly...

#### But it would be better for American MDs to simply stop their mass
infant penis ripping and slicing.

#### Of course, American MDs - and indeed MDs in every country - should stop
their OTHER massive crimes - instead of (for example) authoritatively
pretending that they are interested in collaborating - "particularly" with
doctors of chiropractic - in regard to patient safety...

See Pediatricians reach out to chiropractors (also: AAP's breastfeeding
fraud
and that pesky PF Riley, MD)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...ab637266d61cda

#### Thanks for reading everyone.

#### Sincerely,

#### Todd

#### Dr. Gastaldo
#### Hillsboro, Oregon
#### USA
####

#### PS

Dr Carlo V. Bellieni (cited above) is a neonatologist, professor of neonatal
therapy at the Pediatrics school of the University of Siena, Italy. He is
member of the scientific board of the European Pain School. He has written
several books about the fetus as a person, which have been translated into
Spanish and French. His research on infantile pain has been reported by The
Times (UK), El Mundo (Spain), CNN, ABC, and many other media.
http://www.mercatornet.com/index.php...sk=view&id=444

When an interviewer remarked that "Some scientists deny that the fetus feels
pain"...

Dr. Bellieni replied:

"[P]rejudice and resistance against the recognition of fetal and neonatal
pain are still present and they are big foes to effective treatment."
http://www.mercatornet.com/index.php...sk=view&id=444

Dr. Bellieni also indicated that KJS "Sunny" Anand, "pioneer of neonatal
pain," devoted an issue of the official journal of the International
Association for the Study of Pain (June 2006) to the problem...

DR. BELLIENI'S MENTION OF KJS ANAND REMINDS...
My Oct. 11, 1987 letter calling for an end to the obvious mass child
abuse by American MDs was copied to the New England Journal of
Medicine...


A month later, on November 19, 1987, the New England Journal of
Medicine
belatedly published
Harvard pain expert KJS Anand's admission that he and others had used
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology for decades. [N Eng J Med
1987;317:1322]


Anne B. Fletcher, M.D. editorialized, in that same November 19 issue
of
the Journal, that the pain of circumcision is "incurred by infants."


Anand later told me that he had submitted his paper to the Journal the
year before, but was told it would be "too inflammatory."

NOTE: I recounted my conversation with Prof. Anand in a 1989-90 issue of
Midwifery Today in which I discussed the European medical proposal to
stave off America's threatened recommendation for universal newborn
infant circumcision, with breastfeeding, strict-rooming-in, kneeling
birth and research into applying maternal fecal matter to the infant
penis. See Winberg et al. The prepuce: A mistake of nature? The Lancet
1989].


I think my Oct. 11, 1987 letter to PEDIATRICS - withheld by Editor
Jerold F. Lucey, MD -
stimulated NEJM's belated publication of Anand and Hickey's article.


PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE


I say NEJM and PEDIATRICS editor Jerold F. Lucey, MD committed
psychological violence against me, as in,


"[Withholding] information by restricting scholarly exchange...[is a
form
of]...psychological violence."
--Ralph Crawshaw, MD. Academic sanction: targeting South African
science.
JAMA 1989;262(11):1499-1503


Jerold F. Lucey, MD never did publish my Oct. 11, 1987 letter exposing
Poland et al. perpetuating uncorrected American medicine's phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology. In that same Oct. 11, 1987 letter, I
called for an end to the mass child abuse by MDs.

That was BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago.

Sorry for the "sensorial saturation" (this long post); but it is time for
American medicine to stop massive ongoing "sensorial saturations" - i.e. -
American medicine must finally stop its grisly most frequent surgical
behavior toward males and the other obvious MD crimes.

Stopping the infant screams now instantly saves America an estimated $400
million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE American males can
make for themselves in adulthood.

ATTENTION SUNNY ANAND (via ): Jerold Lucey's
bit of psychological violence against me back in 1987 - and your ongoing
silence regarding the fact that the mass infant penis ripping and slicing is
obvious child abuse - perpetuates senseless mass infant suffering.

The only upside to being frustrated in my attempt to stop mass infant penis
ripping and slicing by MDs - is that I persisted and exposed more (and
worse) mass child abuse by MDs.

See Dents in babies' skulls"
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e

Alternate URL:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3897


In 1986, Dr. Finkel noted that MDs are guilty of failing to report child
abuse.

"What a terrible indictment...guilty of failing those for whom we have
chosen to be advocates." [Finkel KC: The failure to report child abuse.
AJDC, 1986;140:329-330]

Failing to report child abuse is itself a crime.

You are indeed a "pioneer of neonatal pain" - you are a pioneer of helping
American medicine PERPETUATE neonatal pain.

Please stop your crime of silence, Sunny.

Please help stop the infant screams.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


Copied to KJS Anand via

This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.
Search http://groups.google.com for "'Sunny Anand, 'sensorial saturation'
and the tiniest 'raving nutcases'"

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
oups.com...


[massive amounts of Todd's repetitive spam deleted]


Are you capable of posting a message with less than 1,000 words?

David Z wrote:

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
oups.com...


[massive amounts of Todd's repetitive spam deleted]


Are you capable of posting a message with less than 1,000 words?




Sick puppy Todd is the king of cut and paste.

DAVID Z's ONGOING AD HOMINEM

I WROTE ABOUT OBVIOUS CRIME BEING COMMITTED BY MDs...
"[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an -
acknowledged
hazard to health." [Michael Katz, MD: Letter. AJDC, 1980]

"[M]ore than one-half of the skin and mucosa of the penis is
excised..."
http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/30/3/237#411

Rarely, babies die or lose the WHOLE penis

There is NO medical reason to subject children to these risks - let
alone subject them to the pain.

Even if there is "almost complete analgesia" (see sensorial
saturation
below), the infant penis has been ripped and sliced for no medical
reason.

A mutilation/child abuse has occurred - and there are lingering pain
effects.

See PAIN: Babies vs. The Intl Assoc for the Study of Pain (IASP)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...88e6adbaebbd23


DAVID Z REPLIED:


[massive amounts ofTodd'srepetitive spam deleted]


##### David Z,

##### MDs are "spamming" mothers and babies with obvious criminal
behaviors - thousands of times per day.

##### As I noted, law enforcement is looking the other way and one MD
is publicly BOASTING about this.

##### Even though I should post more, I generally only post a few
times per day. If you see error in any of my "spam," please post it -
preferably publicly.

Are you capable of posting a message with less than 1,000 words?


#### Yes - but don't hold your breath - not with MDs committing
obvious crimes and people like you posting ad hominem arguments in
reply.

#### Thanks for reading me - however much you read.

#### I appreciate your replies - but please consider offering some
substantive criticism with your ad hominem.

#### Sincerely,

#### Todd

#### Dr. Gastaldo
#### Hillsboro, Oregon
#### USA
####

RUPERT BEAR wrote:


Sick puppy Todd is the king of cut and paste.

Rupert,

MDs rip and slice.

I cut and paste.

FOR EXAMPLE...

After I posted: HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland, AAP and
infant
circumcision revisited
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...c7261a4aafff5a

.....about American MDs ripping and slicing infant penises en masse
and
perpetuating phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology...

Rupert Bear called my info "crap" and called me a "nutcase" and a "sad
SOB."
("I note with mild interest that this nutcase Todd Gastaldo is still
posting his crap on USENET. Sad SOB if you ask me.")
http://groups.google.com/group/
sci.med/msg/5c267c28a2f35514

RUPERT BEAR:

Thank you for your mild interest.

Please offer some substantive criticism with your ad hominem.

If you see error in my info, please post it publicly.

Thanks.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
ups.com...
RUPERT BEAR wrote:


Sick puppy Todd is the king of cut and paste.

Rupert,

MDs rip and slice.

Every surgical procedure can be described as "ripping and slicing."

Are you opposed to all surgical procedures?

"David Z" wrote in message
...

MDs rip and slice.

Every surgical procedure can be described as "ripping and slicing."

Are you opposed to all surgical procedures?

Once again, Todd demonstrates what a spammer he is by ignoring direct,
substantive questions and, instead, posting more spam and ad hominem
attacks.

David Z wrote:

"David Z" wrote in message
...


MDs rip and slice.

Every surgical procedure can be described as "ripping and slicing."

Are you opposed to all surgical procedures?


Once again, Todd demonstrates what a spammer he is by ignoring direct,
substantive questions and, instead, posting more spam and ad hominem
attacks.




I heard that he gets paid by the megabyte posted by some skin freak
organisation. Is that true?

MDs SLICE VAGINAS TOO - UNNECESSARILY...

David Z asked if I am opposed to all surgical procedures.

I am opposed to all UNNECESSARY surgical procedures.

....like American medicine's mass vagina slicing...

See below.

RUPERT BEAR wrote:

Sick puppyToddis the king of cut and paste.

Rupert,

MDs rip and slice.

DAVID Z REPLIED:


Every surgical procedure can be described as "ripping and slicing."


###### I am not sure that every surgical procedure can be described as
"ripping and slicing" - laser surgeries spring to mind.

DAVID Z ASKED:

Are you opposed to all surgical procedures?


##### No, but I am glad you mentioned other surgical procedures.

MDs ARE SLICING VAGINAS TOO - UNNECESSARILY...

##### MASS ADULT VAGINA SLICING...

##### By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, MDs are closing birh
canals up to 30%.

##### MD-obstetrician experts have been lying to cover-up.

##### For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...

See Dents in babies' skulls"
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e

Alternate URL:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3897

LADIES: PREVENTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up
to 30%, just stay off your sacrum as you push your baby out. Many
women
like side-lying delivery. Kneeling against the raised head of the bed
works. So does
standing. So does hands-and-knees. Virtually EVERY delivery position
allows the birth canal to open maximally - except dorsal and
semisitting - the two most commonly used by obstetricians.


##### MDs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%
(keeping women semisitting or dorsal) when babies get stuck.

##### Vagina slicing - ostensibly to widen the birth canal and
prevent
tears - should never be done with the
birth canal closed up to 30% - yet this obvious obstetric
crime
is
ROUTINE.


##### According to NIH research (Shiono et al.), mass vagina
slicing/routine episiotomy is known to increase severe perineal
tears by 50X, and,


"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is
trauma to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup /factbk3/factbk3.htm


IT'S MASS SEXUAL ASSAULT BY MDs...


##### According to the National Center for Victims of Crime,


"...examples of sexual assault include..Someone putting...an object
in
or on
your vagina...when you don't want them to...A doctor, nurse, or other
health
care professional giving you an unnecessary internal examination or
touching
your sexual organs in an unprofessional, unwarranted and
inappropriate
manner."
http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?d...r&DocumentID=3...


BACK TO MEDICINE'S MASS INFANT PENIS SLICING CRIME...


##### Babies strapped spread-eagled to "Circumstraint" boards SCREAM
their
protests.


##### American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior toward
males
involves
not only PENETRATION of a genital orifice - but SLICING OFF a genital
orifice (the preputial niche).


##### It's obvious mass sexual assault.

##### Numerically speaking, medicine's most frequent surgical
procedures are not only unnecessary - they are criminal.

##### NOTE: When I pointed out that the surgical procedure called
vaccination is an obvious crime as it is promoted by MDs...

##### Steve B. Harris, MD arrogantly boasted:

"Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no
crime.
These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to
you."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
28866f3384801ae9

#### I thank David Z for bringing up the matter of other surgeries.

##### Thanks for reading.

##### Sincerely,

##### Todd

##### Dr. Gastaldo
##### Hillsboro, Oregon
##### USA
#####

On Feb 25, 2:30 pm, "David Z" wrote:
"David Z" wrote in message

...

MDs rip and slice.

Every surgical procedure can be described as "ripping and slicing."

Are you opposed to all surgical procedures?

Once again,Todddemonstrates what a spammer he is by ignoring direct,
substantive questions and, instead, posting more spam and ad hominem
attacks.

LOL. David Z posts his question at 12:00 pm and complains when he
doesn't have an answer by 2:30 pm.

I am only opposed to UNNECESSARY surgery.

See MDs slice vaginas too - unnecessarily
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...d957dfe761b7ad

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA