If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dr K - I see you've met the Nitwit Brigade...
wrote in message ... On Mar 5, 1:06 am, wrote: On Mar 5, 12:39 am, (David Wright) wrote: In article , wrote: On Mar 4, 1:59 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 1:43 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 8:33 am, wrote: On Mar 4, 9:18 am, wrote: Dr K: I was very pleased to see someone of your professional stature raise such an important question about the injection of mercury, the mostly deadly of neurotoxins, into the defenseless bodies of America's children - for money. It must have amazed you that not one of these people actually answered your inquiry. Instead they insulted you. You've just met one of the internet's embarrassments - the proliferation of "fake identities" commenting on subjects. It should have become clear to you that each and every of those "fake identity"commentators would indeed, if allowed to proceed without penalty, forcibly hold down a child, and inject the total scum of vaccaination into that child, by the gallon if they could, just to watch, like Mengele, the suffering, and the permanent damage they inflicted. What I find also amazing is that some of this scum we find here, actually claim to be Jewish, with the obvious intent to defame Judaism - for, it is obvious that none of these subscribe, in even the tiniest way, to the Judeo/Christian Ethic. I've been tempted, from time to time, to notify the Israeli Mossad about this, and suggest some action. This pretense at Judaism is even more appaling, when they, out of the sides of their mouths, rail at those involved in health care issues like world hero Ilena Rosenthal, and her attorneys Mark Goldowitz, and David Shagam. The world is sometimes a bad place - and it is hard to change it back to something good. Working hard at it, though, in California... Tim Bolen Some of these people use fake identities? Why won't they use their own name?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dr K: Good question... Yes, why won't they? I suspect, in the long and the short of it, that we're dealing with a "bully mentality." Bullies are always, in every case, cowards, who run when somebody like me bloodies their nose. Hence, these people don't want somebody like me on their doorstep, or even finding their doorstep. In essence, we're dealing with sissies. Tim Bolen- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Makes sense. One would think that a credible individual would make their identity known. I suppose that it is much easier to hide behind an alias when resorting to cowardly acts. Speaks volumes about the type of people that they are.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I am very curious about all of the secrescy and hidden identities on this forum. Please let us know who you are and why you are so secretive. Do you all belong to a cult or secret society??????? Oh, gee, and I'm sure we should all publish our home addresses and phone numbers, too. You haven't exactly been forthcoming with your full identity, now, have you bub? But I'm betting you're the same Robert Kulacz, D.D.S. who agreed to a consent order in NY State to settle a charge of professional misconduct. Right? -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bub??? Very professional David Anyway, I am Robert Kulacz, DDS and I acknowledged that on a previous thread as well as the disciplinary action. I have nothing to hide "bub" That action is a very interesting story and not unlike other doctors that are targeted for speaking out about certain issues. The treatment of the patient in question was 100% correct as was finally admitted by the New York State Education Department. I did nothing wrong in my diagnosis or treatment but if you are familiar with board agenda, truth does not always matter. This was actually admited to me by the attorney for the New York State Education Department. The story is long and you would not believe it anyway, but suffice to say the state boards have an agenda just as you do. I was more than happy to explain how the attorney for NYS admitted that I was targeted but Mr.Probert did not wish to know. So what is your real name?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -I Mr. Probert initially brought this up and I immediatley confirmed. Frankly, it would be a great topic to illustrate the corruption within the state boards. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unlike..Mark S Probert who denies his being disbarred, and also using aol.com. In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner. 92-02731 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747 November 9, 1992, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert. DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further, HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred. COUNSEL: Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner. JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur. Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further, Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further, Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further, Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law. OPINIONBY: Per Curiam. OPINION: [*282] [**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee. [**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion. The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct. The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately Source: NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT Currency Status: ARCHIVE RECORD NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION Name: MARK PROBERT Date Of Birth: 11/XX/1946 Gender: MALE Address: 1698 WEBSTER AVE MERRICK, NY 11566 County: NASSAU Phone: 516-968-5572 EMPLOYER INFORMATION Employer: MARK S PROBERT ESQ Organization: PERSON LICENSING INFORMATION Licensing Agency: NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION License/Certification Type: ATTORNEY License Number: 1253889 Issue Date: 00/00/1978 License Status: DISBARRED License State: NY From: Mark Probert - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm Email: Mark Probert Groups: k12.chat.teacher Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...779a3cdb7c6546 May 13, 1996 Newsgroups: alt.support.attn-deficit From: (MSProbert) Date: 1996/05/13 Subject: Invest in your kids Mark S. Probert Merrick, New York |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dr K - I see you've met the Nitwit Brigade...
"Frank" wrote in message ... "Jan Drew" wrote in message et... SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT So this is your christian like attitude? Bub, Mark S Probert's disbarrment has nothing to do with either Christian nor attitude. Make a note of it. Hypocrite and spammer. Snipped excess unrelated groups. Restored, Frankie........................ Do not be surprised to see your name in bright lights. You meant you haven't already? Comon down, Frankie!! Bring popcorn. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|