If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:
FOREWORD by DR ARCHIE KALOKERINOS to Ian Sincliar vaccine book http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/ To immunize or not to immunize is a question that, today, is often asked. To answer is difficult. So much knowledge is required for even partial understanding that one would almost find it necessary to complete a university course in medicine before even the basic facts could be grasped logically. There is, therefore, a need for a comprehensive text on the subject. Ian Sinclair has filled that gap. Like most physicians, I spent my training and early post graduate years totally believing in the miracle of vaccines. I remember, only too clearly, the last polio epidemics that swept through Australia. Several infants, children and adults died under my care. One of my colleagues suffered almost total paralysis. When a vaccine was introduced I almost cried with relief and accepted it blindly. It was the same with diphtheria. I struggled to save a few and lost a few. The suffering of those little children is something I will never forget. Neither will I forget how a tiny boy died in violent spasms due to tetanus. And so I was totally and firmly on the value of vaccines. The first change in attitude came ten years after graduation when I observed that routine vaccinations and immunization made some children sick and could even lead to death. I must stress that this was an observation - not a "theory". So I changed my attitude and realised that children who were ill - even with a trivial "cold" should not be immunized. To me this was a simple and important 'fact'. To my surprise, my colleagues not only disagreed, they became hostile - a hostility that killed two infants in the area under my partial control. In this way I was forced to think and study more deeply. What I found was a minefield which was really a conspiracy to hide the truth from the people on this earth. I well remember, some years ago, listening to a knighted medical researcher as he spoke, on the radio, about vaccines. He told two classical stories form the history books. The first concerned Edward Jenner who, according to history, watched as the milkmaid caught cowpox and this protected her from smallpox. So Jenner got some of the 'cowpox' and inoculated it into someone's arm - it fostered and the pus was then inoculated into someone else -100% success was claimed. 100% !! How absurd - complete with all sorts of germs including hepatitis, syphilis and whatever. If one did that today, without antibiotics, the death rate would be huge. Worse still, the genetic make up of smallpox vaccine is known today. It is not cowpox. Where it came from is unknown. Now this does not prove that the vaccine is inefficient. It simply means that the history is wrong. So do not let it be used as a basis for supporting vaccination. Then we have Louis Pasteur and his four dogs. Two were given his rabies vaccine - two were not. On exposure to rabies the two vaccinated dogs survived. The two non-vaccinated dogs died. TRIUMPH!! So it seems, but what rubbish. First, Pasteur tried to get that result many times and failed. The two vaccinated dogs would die - or one would die. Eventually, by chance he got the "right" result and this is what is told in history (only that). Even today a rabies vaccine cannot be made that gives such protection. With tetanus I can tell a personal story. At University we were taught that no cases of tetanus occurred during World War II amongst Australian Service men because they were all vaccinated against tetanus. I believed this until I suffered an injury after being fully immunized. I received a booster shot and got tetanus. The cultural shock was enormous. When I reviewed the literature I found many such cases. In civilian practice it is impossible to totally protect against tetanus. Under near ideal conditions, there were in fact, cases in the army. They were kept well hidden. Three outstanding fiascos during recent years demonstrate how the entrenched attitudes of medical authorities lead to enormous loss of life and suffering. All three I personally tried to stop and was soundly abused. The first is the immunization campaigns in Africa where dirty needles were used. It is thought by many that this is what spread AIDS so rapidly. The second was the swine flu fiasco in the USA 1976. The history of that should be studied by all. The third is the use of AIDS loaded hepatitis B vaccine by the Canadian Health Authorities in the 1980s. If doctors like myself are to be regarded as "ratbags" - then how does one explain these three massive tragic events? Only after realising that routine immunizations were dangerous did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates. It is, therefore, with a sense of gratitude, that I welcome the contribution made by Ian Sinclair. Dr Archie Kalokerinos |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
"john" wrote in message ... This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from: Nice personal attack. Jeff |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
"john" wrote in message ... This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from: ..... The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it. Bowditch as a surname is no worse nor better than Scudamore. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
"HCN" wrote in message . .. "john" wrote in message ... This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from: .... The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it. Hey, I take exception to that comment. My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very good treatment for many conditions. Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium, potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of good health and nutrition. Carole http://www.cellsalts.net http://www.conspiracee.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
In article ,
Carole wrote: "HCN" wrote in message ... "john" wrote in message ... This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from: .... The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it. Hey, I take exception to that comment. My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very good treatment for many conditions. Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium, potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of good health and nutrition. Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're hardly an authority. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me." -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
Carole wrote:
"HCN" wrote in message . .. "john" wrote in message ... This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from: .... The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it. Hey, I take exception to that comment. You can take exception to your hearts content. However, that does not make your websites any less loonie. My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very good treatment for many conditions. That is why it is listed. Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium, potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of good health and nutrition. Sure. Loonie sites deleted. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
"Jeff" wrote in message ink.net... "john" wrote in message ... This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from: Nice personal attack. Jeff thanks |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
David Wright wrote: In article , Carole wrote: My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very good treatment for many conditions. Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium, potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of good health and nutrition. Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're hardly an authority. Who cares? Probably if I'd been through a science course I'd be as mind controlled as the rest of you. We all know about the Rockefeller donations towards major schools of learning, and how they influenced what was taught. Carole http://www.cellsalts.net |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
"carole" wrote in message oups.com... David Wright wrote: In article , Carole wrote: My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very good treatment for many conditions. Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium, potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of good health and nutrition. Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're hardly an authority. Who cares? Probably if I'd been through a science course I'd be as mind controlled as the rest of you. We all know about the Rockefeller donations towards major schools of learning, and how they influenced what was taught. Riiight. The Rockefellers are manipulating the schools to teach false doctrines of chemistry, and the key to truth is ignorance.This may be the stupidest conspiracy theory of all. Do the Rockefellers have secret schools where they teach the REAL chemistry to develop chemists who are sworn to secrecy and enslaved to the Rockefeller petrochemical companies? -- --Rich Recommended websites: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ratbags/Bowditch
carole wrote:
David Wright wrote: In article , Carole wrote: My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very good treatment for many conditions. Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium, potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of good health and nutrition. Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're hardly an authority. Who cares? Probably if I'd been through a science course I'd be as mind controlled as the rest of you. We all know about the Rockefeller donations towards major schools of learning, and how they influenced what was taught. I must agree with you. The Rockefellers have so much money that they created quantum physics, the General Theory of Relativity, all of biology, and String Theory. Yes, money is the most powerful thing in the universe. It is the principal component of Dark Energy and Dark Matter. Carole http://www.cellsalts.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|