If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
over payment of child support.
So let me give a quick history. I gained custody of my now 14 year old son
almost two years ago after she had him for 3. I was awarded the grand sum of $76 a month child support. I received one check. She went on and off welfare with her new ******* son halfway across the country. I got a notice they were again suspending welfare dating back to Nov, 2003 since she is riding the welfare train. I contested it and asked for a hearing. She filed her taxes and they seized $596 and sent it to me two weeks ago.. I lost the hearing so she should not have paid me for Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, March and maybe April. So that means she "overpaid" me up to $456 too much since then. The ALJ that held the hearing will be mailing out her judgement in a week or two stating that she is presumed to be unable to pay support since she is a welfare mom. So what about the $456??? will they ask me to send it back? Will they hold it until she miraculously becomes educated and fully employed again? Of course, if this were a man that overpaid, they would never give it back, but a woman probably stands a better chance. The order is written in Oregon. Thanks folks Jon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
over payment of child support.
"Jon" wrote in message ... So let me give a quick history. I gained custody of my now 14 year old son almost two years ago after she had him for 3. I was awarded the grand sum of $76 a month child support. I received one check. She went on and off welfare with her new ******* son halfway across the country. I got a notice they were again suspending welfare dating back to Nov, 2003 since she is riding the welfare train. I contested it and asked for a hearing. She filed her taxes and they seized $596 and sent it to me two weeks ago.. I lost the hearing so she should not have paid me for Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, March and maybe April. So that means she "overpaid" me up to $456 too much since then. The ALJ that held the hearing will be mailing out her judgement in a week or two stating that she is presumed to be unable to pay support since she is a welfare mom. So what about the $456??? will they ask me to send it back? Will they hold it until she miraculously becomes educated and fully employed again? Of course, if this were a man that overpaid, they would never give it back, but a woman probably stands a better chance. The order is written in Oregon. Thanks folks Jon Just remind the Oregon CSE people that their position in other cases where money is sent erroneously to CP mothers is - Once the money is sent into the home for the benefit of the child, CSE has no control over the money or how it is spent. IOW - Shove their sexist crap back in their collective faces! If that doesn't work, I'll testify for you about how they pull this charade. I have written statements from these sexist *******s sent to me on this very issue. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
over payment of child support.
"Jon" wrote in message ... So let me give a quick history. I gained custody of my now 14 year old son almost two years ago after she had him for 3. I was awarded the grand sum of $76 a month child support. I received one check. She went on and off welfare with her new ******* son halfway across the country. I got a notice they were again suspending welfare dating back to Nov, 2003 since she is riding the welfare train. I contested it and asked for a hearing. She filed her taxes and they seized $596 and sent it to me two weeks ago.. I lost the hearing so she should not have paid me for Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, March and maybe April. So that means she "overpaid" me up to $456 too much since then. The ALJ that held the hearing will be mailing out her judgement in a week or two stating that she is presumed to be unable to pay support since she is a welfare mom. So what about the $456??? will they ask me to send it back? Will they hold it until she miraculously becomes educated and fully employed again? Of course, if this were a man that overpaid, they would never give it back, but a woman probably stands a better chance. The order is written in Oregon. Thanks folks Jon Just remind the Oregon CSE people that their position in other cases where money is sent erroneously to CP mothers is - Once the money is sent into the home for the benefit of the child, CSE has no control over the money or how it is spent. IOW - Shove their sexist crap back in their collective faces! If that doesn't work, I'll testify for you about how they pull this charade. I have written statements from these sexist *******s sent to me on this very issue. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
over payment of child support.
"Jon" wrote in message ... So let me give a quick history. I gained custody of my now 14 year old son almost two years ago after she had him for 3. I was awarded the grand sum of $76 a month child support. I received one check. She went on and off welfare with her new ******* son halfway across the country. I got a notice they were again suspending welfare dating back to Nov, 2003 since she is riding the welfare train. I contested it and asked for a hearing. She filed her taxes and they seized $596 and sent it to me two weeks ago.. I lost the hearing so she should not have paid me for Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, March and maybe April. So that means she "overpaid" me up to $456 too much since then. The ALJ that held the hearing will be mailing out her judgement in a week or two stating that she is presumed to be unable to pay support since she is a welfare mom. So what about the $456??? will they ask me to send it back? Will they hold it until she miraculously becomes educated and fully employed again? Of course, if this were a man that overpaid, they would never give it back, but a woman probably stands a better chance. The order is written in Oregon. Thanks folks Jon Just remind the Oregon CSE people that their position in other cases where money is sent erroneously to CP mothers is - Once the money is sent into the home for the benefit of the child, CSE has no control over the money or how it is spent. IOW - Shove their sexist crap back in their collective faces! If that doesn't work, I'll testify for you about how they pull this charade. I have written statements from these sexist *******s sent to me on this very issue. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Dennis was U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 63 | November 17th 03 10:12 PM |