A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chaos at DHS: "Child Protective Services" A panel offers reformsuggestions, but officials remain in policy limbo.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 14th 07, 12:28 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
fx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,848
Default Chaos at DHS: "Child Protective Services" A panel offers reformsuggestions, but officials remain in policy limbo.


Chaos at DHS
A panel offers reform suggestions, but officials remain in policy limbo.

by Doron Taussig

http://www.citypaper.net/articles/20...4/chaos-at-dhs

Published: Jun 12, 2007


On June 5, four days after the mayor's Child Welfare Review Panel
released its much-anticipated report on conditions at the Department of
Human Services, the staff at DHS was buzzing from a cocktail of anxiety
and anger — but not because of the big publication. Rather, social
workers were upset about rumors of disciplinary actions about to be
dished out by Commissioner Arthur Evans.

The previous week, 9-month-old Seaser Tiller had drowned in a bathtub
when his mother left him to check her e-mail. Tiller's family had been
on active DHS oversight, and when word came down that the supervisor
involved with the case was retiring, and disciplinary action was being
initiated against the administrator and director, it sent a tremor of
worry through the office.

With workers on edge, representatives from AFSCME District Council 47,
the union that represents DHS, spent the day walking around the
department's headquarters at 1515 Arch St., trying to ease the tension.
PAID ADVERTISEMENT

"I told people I know that they heard [people got fired], but it was not
accurate," says Rita Urwitz, the representative for DHS supervisors. She
reminded them that there is a formal disciplinary process that has to be
followed before someone is fired from DHS.

After she'd calmed someone down, Urwitz would try to shift his or her
attention away from the disciplinary action — which affected a few
ranking people at DHS — and back to the thing that could change the very
essence of the agency: the CWRP report.

The nine-member CWRP, which was filled with both local and national
child-welfare experts, was established by Mayor Street after the
Inquirer ran a series of articles highlighting cases in which children
under DHS care had died, and scrutinizing the agency's practices. Street
also asked for the resignation of popular DHS Commissioner Cheryl
Ransom-Garner.

In the immediate aftermath, conditions at the department threatened to
actually get worse: Workers were demoralized and the rate of children
being put in "placement" (foster homes, group homes or kinship care)
spiked dramatically, signaling that children were being placed out of a
sense of panic, rather than good practice. But there was still hope
around the child-welfare community that the Inquirer's series would, in
time, lead to smart, lasting reforms. The main vessel of that hope was
the mayor's panel.

The panel reviewed 52 cases in which children under DHS care died
between 2001 and 2006, and conducted interviews with many DHS staff and
stakeholders. Its report, entitled "The Call to Action," is unequivocal
in its view that DHS, as an organization, is not fulfilling its mission.
It calls DHS a "stressed organization," and notes that, since
Philadelphia is better-financed than most child welfare agencies, the
problem is not a lack of money.

One of the report's central critiques is that DHS has lost sight of its
core mission: ensuring the safety of children. The department has become
the "agency of last resort" among the city's social services, the panel
noted, and as a result, it takes on tasks and cases involving all sorts
of problems — housing, mental health — that don't necessarily threaten a
child's well-being. This extra work diverts resources and muddies the
workers' vision of what they should be doing.

To address this problem, the panel recommended the agency rewrite its
mission statement, and change its procedures to reflect its original
priorities. If a report of abuse or neglect comes in about any child 5
years old or younger (the most vulnerable population), the panel said,
DHS should visit that child within two hours. At present, the majority
of such children are visited within 24 hours.

The panel also lamented what it called a "theme of randomness" in how
DHS assesses and addresses its cases: Workers often go with their guts,
rather than making determinations based on statistical risk factors. To
this end, the CWRP called on DHS to institute a "safety assessment
tool," a standard questionnaire all investigators would use to assess
the risk level of a child's situation.

There was much more to the report, of course, including recommendations
about monitoring outside agencies and a recognition of the stressful,
dangerous work social workers do. But the big take-away message seemed
to be: DHS needs to narrow its focus, and be more thorough and
methodical with what it focuses on.

Response to the report from stakeholders and experts has been mixed,
though tilting toward the positive. Commissioner Evans has embraced the
whole thing unhesitatingly, noting that the department has already begun
work on 21 of the panel's 31 recommendations. His attempt to heed the
panel's advice may even have been too eager: The commissioner initially
wanted to issue a directive telling workers not to accept cases that
didn't meet the state standard for child protective service. But the
state's definition has some big loopholes. If, for instance, someone
abusing a child doesn't live in the child's home, you can arrest that
person, but you can't technically confirm a child-abuse allegation.
Learning this, Evans amended his plans, leaving room for cases with
clear risk factors.

The rank and file has expressed more trepidation. Staffers familiar with
the contents of the CWRP report (it is available online at
www.philadelphiacwrp.org, but has not been distributed) tend to worry
about the two-hour visitation deadline for young children, whether it's
realistic, and how much harder it will make their lives.

What reservations workers have, though, will likely be mollified by the
fact that their union reps are pleased with the report, and are speaking
out in its favor. Both Urwitz and her union colleague Kahim Boles have
used the word "great" to describe the panel's work. They found promising
the report's suggestion that social workers have too much redundant
paperwork; the procedural recommendations, they felt, were right
on-point as well.

The only loud concerns about the report have come from advocates of
parents' rights. Though the CWRP did not express an opinion as to the
circumstances under which the government should take a child from
parents, many people assume that "child safety" means "child removal,"
says Richard Wexler of the National Coalition for Child Protection
Reform. (Wexler's organization believes children should only be removed
under the most extreme circumstances, and that "family preservation
services" should be used to keep families together as often as possible.)

Because the CWRP report did not explain that safety can sometimes be
achieved without breaking apart a family, Wexler worries that the spike
in placements that followed the Inquirer series this winter will resume.
(In 2007, the number of placements have returned to almost pre-Inquirer
levels.)

Still, Wexler and other parent advocates actually like the CWRP's
recommendations. Katherine Gomez of Philadelphia's Community Legal
Services says she hopes that by decreasing random decision-making, DHS
will reduce the number of parents who have their children unnecessarily
removed. Indeed, most everyone seems to think that the general gist of
the report's analysis is correct.

That's not to say improvement is guaranteed. But it begs the question:
If everyone in Philadelphia child welfare agrees on the major flaws in
the system, why did it take several tragic deaths, a muckraking series
from the Inquirer, and a huge shake up that threw the system into
disarray to bring about a movement toward reform? Faced with this,
experts tend to point out that, even in other jurisdictions, child
welfare agencies have needed to see some threat before changing course.

"This is a bureaucracy," says Boles, of the social workers' union.
"Bureaucracies get caught in a groove. And everybody's screaming, 'Turn!
Make a turn!' And it doesn't happen."







CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
  #2  
Old June 14th 07, 01:12 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
Moderator
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Chaos at DHS: "Child Protective Services" A panel offers reformsuggestions, but officials remain in policy limbo.

fx wrote:

You'd think after 3 decades of ridiculous excuses for their
incompetence, someone would get a clue.

Hold caseworkers responsible for the horrible abuse they heap on
innocent families - make them pay for their crimes against family
instead of listening to their sorry ass excuses year after year, decade
after decade.

Today, 38% of children torn from their familys have not been abused or
neglected, and are not t risk of abuse or neglect. They go to foster
hell for one reason and one reason only -- to enrich CPS cronies like
Don/Kane/d'geezer.

There's hardly any lower scum.


=========================

Chaos at DHS
A panel offers reform suggestions, but officials remain in policy limbo.

by Doron Taussig

http://www.citypaper.net/articles/20...4/chaos-at-dhs

Published: Jun 12, 2007


On June 5, four days after the mayor's Child Welfare Review Panel
released its much-anticipated report on conditions at the Department of
Human Services, the staff at DHS was buzzing from a cocktail of anxiety
and anger — but not because of the big publication. Rather, social
workers were upset about rumors of disciplinary actions about to be
dished out by Commissioner Arthur Evans.

The previous week, 9-month-old Seaser Tiller had drowned in a bathtub
when his mother left him to check her e-mail. Tiller's family had been
on active DHS oversight, and when word came down that the supervisor
involved with the case was retiring, and disciplinary action was being
initiated against the administrator and director, it sent a tremor of
worry through the office.

With workers on edge, representatives from AFSCME District Council 47,
the union that represents DHS, spent the day walking around the
department's headquarters at 1515 Arch St., trying to ease the tension.
PAID ADVERTISEMENT

"I told people I know that they heard [people got fired], but it was not
accurate," says Rita Urwitz, the representative for DHS supervisors. She
reminded them that there is a formal disciplinary process that has to be
followed before someone is fired from DHS.

After she'd calmed someone down, Urwitz would try to shift his or her
attention away from the disciplinary action — which affected a few
ranking people at DHS — and back to the thing that could change the very
essence of the agency: the CWRP report.

The nine-member CWRP, which was filled with both local and national
child-welfare experts, was established by Mayor Street after the
Inquirer ran a series of articles highlighting cases in which children
under DHS care had died, and scrutinizing the agency's practices. Street
also asked for the resignation of popular DHS Commissioner Cheryl
Ransom-Garner.

In the immediate aftermath, conditions at the department threatened to
actually get worse: Workers were demoralized and the rate of children
being put in "placement" (foster homes, group homes or kinship care)
spiked dramatically, signaling that children were being placed out of a
sense of panic, rather than good practice. But there was still hope
around the child-welfare community that the Inquirer's series would, in
time, lead to smart, lasting reforms. The main vessel of that hope was
the mayor's panel.

The panel reviewed 52 cases in which children under DHS care died
between 2001 and 2006, and conducted interviews with many DHS staff and
stakeholders. Its report, entitled "The Call to Action," is unequivocal
in its view that DHS, as an organization, is not fulfilling its mission.
It calls DHS a "stressed organization," and notes that, since
Philadelphia is better-financed than most child welfare agencies, the
problem is not a lack of money.

One of the report's central critiques is that DHS has lost sight of its
core mission: ensuring the safety of children. The department has become
the "agency of last resort" among the city's social services, the panel
noted, and as a result, it takes on tasks and cases involving all sorts
of problems — housing, mental health — that don't necessarily threaten a
child's well-being. This extra work diverts resources and muddies the
workers' vision of what they should be doing.

To address this problem, the panel recommended the agency rewrite its
mission statement, and change its procedures to reflect its original
priorities. If a report of abuse or neglect comes in about any child 5
years old or younger (the most vulnerable population), the panel said,
DHS should visit that child within two hours. At present, the majority
of such children are visited within 24 hours.

The panel also lamented what it called a "theme of randomness" in how
DHS assesses and addresses its cases: Workers often go with their guts,
rather than making determinations based on statistical risk factors. To
this end, the CWRP called on DHS to institute a "safety assessment
tool," a standard questionnaire all investigators would use to assess
the risk level of a child's situation.

There was much more to the report, of course, including recommendations
about monitoring outside agencies and a recognition of the stressful,
dangerous work social workers do. But the big take-away message seemed
to be: DHS needs to narrow its focus, and be more thorough and
methodical with what it focuses on.

Response to the report from stakeholders and experts has been mixed,
though tilting toward the positive. Commissioner Evans has embraced the
whole thing unhesitatingly, noting that the department has already begun
work on 21 of the panel's 31 recommendations. His attempt to heed the
panel's advice may even have been too eager: The commissioner initially
wanted to issue a directive telling workers not to accept cases that
didn't meet the state standard for child protective service. But the
state's definition has some big loopholes. If, for instance, someone
abusing a child doesn't live in the child's home, you can arrest that
person, but you can't technically confirm a child-abuse allegation.
Learning this, Evans amended his plans, leaving room for cases with
clear risk factors.

The rank and file has expressed more trepidation. Staffers familiar with
the contents of the CWRP report (it is available online at
www.philadelphiacwrp.org, but has not been distributed) tend to worry
about the two-hour visitation deadline for young children, whether it's
realistic, and how much harder it will make their lives.

What reservations workers have, though, will likely be mollified by the
fact that their union reps are pleased with the report, and are speaking
out in its favor. Both Urwitz and her union colleague Kahim Boles have
used the word "great" to describe the panel's work. They found promising
the report's suggestion that social workers have too much redundant
paperwork; the procedural recommendations, they felt, were right
on-point as well.

The only loud concerns about the report have come from advocates of
parents' rights. Though the CWRP did not express an opinion as to the
circumstances under which the government should take a child from
parents, many people assume that "child safety" means "child removal,"
says Richard Wexler of the National Coalition for Child Protection
Reform. (Wexler's organization believes children should only be removed
under the most extreme circumstances, and that "family preservation
services" should be used to keep families together as often as possible.)

Because the CWRP report did not explain that safety can sometimes be
achieved without breaking apart a family, Wexler worries that the spike
in placements that followed the Inquirer series this winter will resume.
(In 2007, the number of placements have returned to almost pre-Inquirer
levels.)

Still, Wexler and other parent advocates actually like the CWRP's
recommendations. Katherine Gomez of Philadelphia's Community Legal
Services says she hopes that by decreasing random decision-making, DHS
will reduce the number of parents who have their children unnecessarily
removed. Indeed, most everyone seems to think that the general gist of
the report's analysis is correct.

That's not to say improvement is guaranteed. But it begs the question:
If everyone in Philadelphia child welfare agrees on the major flaws in
the system, why did it take several tragic deaths, a muckraking series
from the Inquirer, and a huge shake up that threw the system into
disarray to bring about a movement toward reform? Faced with this,
experts tend to point out that, even in other jurisdictions, child
welfare agencies have needed to see some threat before changing course.

"This is a bureaucracy," says Boles, of the social workers' union.
"Bureaucracies get caught in a groove. And everybody's screaming, 'Turn!
Make a turn!' And it doesn't happen."







CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Former resident sues county, Department of Social Services: claimsthat "government officials" knew the allegations were false, but still begana "nine-month campaign of harassment." fx Spanking 1 June 10th 07 12:30 PM
Former resident sues county, Department of Social Services: claimsthat "government officials" knew the allegations were false, but still begana "nine-month campaign of harassment." fx Foster Parents 1 June 10th 07 12:30 PM
Riverside County orders review of social services department: UnionLocal 721, who complained Child Protective Services was "broken" and thatnearly half of child welfare workers in Riverside had less than a year ofseniority. fx Spanking 0 May 12th 07 04:36 AM
Riverside County orders review of social services department: UnionLocal 721, who complained Child Protective Services was "broken" and thatnearly half of child welfare workers in Riverside had less than a year ofseniority. fx Foster Parents 0 May 12th 07 04:36 AM
[FOR SALE] Your Children: WHAT "Child Protective Services" ISREALLY ABOUT... fx Spanking 1 March 29th 07 01:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.