If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
free cross exam question
FREE trial cross exam question of the day:
IF CHILD SUPPORT MONEY IS NEEDED TO PAY FOR A HOUSE FOR THE CHILDREN TO LIVE IN, YOU WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION FOR THE TITLE BEING HELD IN TRUST FOR THE CHILDREN WOULD YOU? (mark http://www.lowersupport.com as a favorite place!) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
free cross exam question
This is by no means meant to be a personal insult...but if you're such
a damn good attorney who knows most NCPs are being ripped off, why are you always trying to sell us your publications? Why don't you release your publications for free and live off of the huge amounts of cash your local clients are charged? I know plenty of NCPs who actually end up taking the CSE agency/state/ ex to court Pro Se because all attorneys seem to want is cash - as opposed to "justice". Hell, I'm suing the Commonwealth of Virginia because no attorney in at least 15 years has ever questioned the authority of a non-attorney employee of the Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement to sign pleadings. It's ****ing illegal...and no attorney's been smart enough to ever question that. No Virginia attorney's ever questioned Virginia's DCSE and their propensity to move interest up and down on child support arrearages - sometimes screwing NCPs, other times screwing CPs. It's ILLEGAL. No Virginia attorney's has even questioned the practice of allowing the ex-wife's attorney to prosecute the father for contempt. It's ILLEGAL. No Virginia attorney's has even questioned the ability to impose a purge clause on a dad without first making a finding that he has the present ability to pay - the standard in most states with caselaw on the subject. It's UNCONSTITUTIONAL. I'm getting sick and tired of having my rights violated by a state- driven machine, while attorneys just want TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, just to appeal it. On Aug 10, 12:22 pm, "fathersrights" wrote: FREE trial cross exam question of the day: IF CHILD SUPPORT MONEY IS NEEDED TO PAY FOR A HOUSE FOR THE CHILDREN TO LIVE IN, YOU WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION FOR THE TITLE BEING HELD IN TRUST FOR THE CHILDREN WOULD YOU? (markhttp://www.lowersupport.comas a favorite place!) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
free cross exam question
The books educate men so if necessary they CAN represent themselves. Why
don't YOU just donate your whole paycheck to fathers rights causes! wrote in message oups.com... This is by no means meant to be a personal insult...but if you're such a damn good attorney who knows most NCPs are being ripped off, why are you always trying to sell us your publications? Why don't you release your publications for free and live off of the huge amounts of cash your local clients are charged? I know plenty of NCPs who actually end up taking the CSE agency/state/ ex to court Pro Se because all attorneys seem to want is cash - as opposed to "justice". Hell, I'm suing the Commonwealth of Virginia because no attorney in at least 15 years has ever questioned the authority of a non-attorney employee of the Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement to sign pleadings. It's ****ing illegal...and no attorney's been smart enough to ever question that. No Virginia attorney's ever questioned Virginia's DCSE and their propensity to move interest up and down on child support arrearages - sometimes screwing NCPs, other times screwing CPs. It's ILLEGAL. No Virginia attorney's has even questioned the practice of allowing the ex-wife's attorney to prosecute the father for contempt. It's ILLEGAL. No Virginia attorney's has even questioned the ability to impose a purge clause on a dad without first making a finding that he has the present ability to pay - the standard in most states with caselaw on the subject. It's UNCONSTITUTIONAL. I'm getting sick and tired of having my rights violated by a state- driven machine, while attorneys just want TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, just to appeal it. On Aug 10, 12:22 pm, "fathersrights" wrote: FREE trial cross exam question of the day: IF CHILD SUPPORT MONEY IS NEEDED TO PAY FOR A HOUSE FOR THE CHILDREN TO LIVE IN, YOU WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION FOR THE TITLE BEING HELD IN TRUST FOR THE CHILDREN WOULD YOU? (markhttp://www.lowersupport.comas a favorite place!) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
question (cross post) | zolwica | Pregnancy | 19 | June 25th 05 05:45 AM |
postpartum eye exam-when? | Karen | Pregnancy | 7 | April 12th 04 09:43 PM |
pap smear and vaginal exam? | Matthew And Jody | Pregnancy | 4 | November 14th 03 05:01 PM |
2nd OB Exam ~ A waste of time?? | Sophie | Pregnancy | 10 | September 17th 03 05:10 PM |
My First OB Exam Results | cloud nine | Pregnancy | 6 | August 19th 03 01:14 AM |