Sullivan CLAIMS Pangborn gets paid $50,000 per case! :-)))))))))))))))

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000? Have you been taking math lessons from Larry? Could it be
from 30000 to 70000? And how is that different (your assertion)
from "*middle* five figures?"

It's a shame you've chosen to devote nearly 100% of your time to me
rather than learning. Really it is.


--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

On 10 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.
Any special reason you devote nearly 100%, if not 100%, of your
Usenet time to me?
You are aware there are other topics in the world, right?

Have you been taking math lessons from Larry? Could it be
from 30000 to 70000? And how is that different (your assertion)
from "*middle* five figures?"

I didn't assert middle five figures. That was Dan.
Fregoli much?


It's a shame you've chosen to devote nearly 100% of your time to me
rather than learning. Really it is.


--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

"tjab" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000? Have you been taking math lessons from Larry? Could it be
from 30000 to 70000? And how is that different (your assertion)
from "*middle* five figures?"

In ANY event I don't get the $30,000 either. And NOT even $20,000. Sullivan
broke down and ACCIDENTALLY posted the truth. That is REALLY was $3,500 he
was referring to. To DANNY . .. $3,500 is MID FIVE FIGURES...........
Really MID 4 figure retainers. Isn't the BULL**** of these two clowns
funny?

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:00:19 GMT, " krp" wrote:

[...]


Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000? Have you been taking math lessons from Larry? Could it be
from 30000 to 70000? And how is that different (your assertion)
from "*middle* five figures?"

In ANY event I don't get the $30,000 either. And NOT even $20,000. Sullivan
broke down and ACCIDENTALLY posted the truth. That is REALLY was $3,500 he
was referring to.

So someone pays you $3500.00 and not a penny more? Ever?
If, as you are implying, this is the case, why do you have other
fees listed?

To DANNY . .. $3,500 is MID FIVE FIGURES...........
Really MID 4 figure retainers.

I find it impossible to accept your position that you only charge
$3500.00 for everything.
If it's true, you should be applauded for your sacrifice. The
tests alone would quickly eat up your retainer.
Of course, I think you're lying. Still.

Isn't the BULL**** of these two clowns
funny?


Dan is only one person, dullard.



From:
"Kenneth R. Pangborn, MS"

To:


James Giglio wrote:

"Exhibit 23" makes no sense. Apparently, my name is on it, along with
Michelle Deveraux and Chris Barden. Can anybody explain?


I feel so hurt. Diana doesn't even name me. Doesn't she know how
important I am?

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.

That your standard for accuracy is that something "entered your head"
explains a great deal.

Any special reason you devote nearly 100%, if not 100%, of your
Usenet time to me?
You are aware there are other topics in the world, right?

Have you been taking math lessons from Larry? Could it be
from 30000 to 70000? And how is that different (your assertion)
from "*middle* five figures?"

I didn't assert middle five figures. That was Dan.
Fregoli much?


It's a shame you've chosen to devote nearly 100% of your time to me
rather than learning. Really it is.


--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

"tjab" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.

That your standard for accuracy is that something "entered your head"
explains a great deal.

Wills claims he has an "open mind" - - the whistling noise in his ears must
drive him NUTS!

On 11 Aug 2008 19:30:29 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.

That your standard for accuracy is that something "entered your head"
explains a great deal.

No comment about accuracy was made.
Is there a specific reason you're lying and implying there was?


--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

Any special reason you devote nearly 100%, if not 100%, of your
Usenet time to me?
You are aware there are other topics in the world, right?

Have you been taking math lessons from Larry? Could it be
from 30000 to 70000? And how is that different (your assertion)
from "*middle* five figures?"

I didn't assert middle five figures. That was Dan.
Fregoli much?


It's a shame you've chosen to devote nearly 100% of your time to me
rather than learning. Really it is.


--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:09:02 GMT, " krp" wrote:


"tjab" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.

That your standard for accuracy is that something "entered your head"
explains a great deal.

Wills claims he has an "open mind"

I do? Can you offer a cite for this?

- - the whistling noise in his ears must
drive him NUTS!



If only you knew the pleasure of a woman (or, in your case, man)
whistling in your ear. It often is a prelude to more.


"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 11 Aug 2008 19:30:29 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
On 10 Aug 2008 13:50:40 -0400, (tjab) wrote:

In article ,
Kent Wills wrote:
Mid five figures isn't *middle* five figures, except in your
drunken stupors.

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.

That your standard for accuracy is that something "entered your head"
explains a great deal.

No comment about accuracy was made.
Is there a specific reason you're lying and implying there was?

On the contrary, in reading a Kent Wills post, it goes without saying
that accuracy is the one thing one would never expect to find.

"tjab" wrote in message
...

What is "mid five figures" in whatever mental state you claim to be
in?



To anyone whose entire life doesn't revolve around me, this will
exclude you of course, it can be from 30,000 to 60,000.

Any special reason you chose 20000 under 50000 but only 10000 over
50000?

They're the numbers that entered my head.

That your standard for accuracy is that something "entered your head"
explains a great deal.

No comment about accuracy was made.
Is there a specific reason you're lying and implying there was?

On the contrary, in reading a Kent Wills post, it goes without saying
that accuracy is the one thing one would never expect to find.


What is amusing is that TODAY Danny Sullivan is bitterly DENYING he ever
claimed my retainers were in the "mid five figures." He claims he never said
that!!!! And of course as usual our Polack has tried to be a math professor
and defend the claim using his best Polish math to tell is that $3,500 *IS*
in the mid five figures. His contributions ( at least what I can read of
them in the replies of others to his crazy ****) are so utterly ridiculous
that I try to waste as little time replying to his deranged **** as
possible. His claims that $3,500 *IS* a "mid five figure" amount is one
of the main reasons I try so hard to ignore him.