Don't Call It Algebra; Call It Something Warm And Fuzzy

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

Yeah, bitch, don't get near me.


Y'know, I'm trying to see things from your point of view, but I can't stick
my head that far up my ass.

Being the loudest kid on the short bus is not something to be proud of.

I heard you both like to park the beef bus in turd town.

On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:23:00 -0500, Zoomz wrote:

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

Yeah, bitch, don't get near me.


Y'know, I'm trying to see things from your point of view,

Try this point of view, Jamaal:

Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:

Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1

The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
______

And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the robbery
rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1 (Hispanics not
included) based on the following poverty rates:
white: 9.9%
black: 22.7%
Hispanic: 21.7%

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/pover...v/hstpov2.html

2005:

Impoverished blacks 9,168,000
Impoverished total 36,950,000

Secondly, while you may argue that a hungry group would naturally
commit more robberies, what's your excuse for rape, murder, assault?

("Dat whyte guy makes more money then me,so I think I'll rape my
neighbor.") Huh!!!??!

Thirdly, the muscular thugs who are committing this savagery look
anything but hungry.

Finally, in a recent study of NFL players, it was found that their
crime rates were only slightly less than those of their respective
demographic groups in the general population. ("Pros And Cons: The
Criminals Who Play In The NFL" by Jeff yaeger and Jeff Benedict,
Time-Life Books)

Even Je$$e Jack$on was left speechless.

It ain't fiscal bankruptcy, but moral bankruptcy, aided-and-abetted by
the guilty white liberal girly men who continue to make excuses and
keep them on a victim plantatation of self-pity, anger, and hatred.


_________

Zoomz wrote:
"Jasper Towing Co; Lmtd." wrote:

**** off, whigger apologist


Just the intelligent response I was expecting. Predictable as the clan.

Eat ****, then die you faggot

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1

The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf


Any statistics from later than EIGHT YEARS AGO?

Electrician wrote:
Eat ****, then die you faggot



Oohhh! You suck yer daddie's dick with that mouth?

On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:23:20 -0500, Zoomz wrote:

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1

The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf


Any statistics from later than EIGHT YEARS AGO?

BWAHAHAHAHA.

Yeah, you people have improved your behavior since then.

BWAHAHAHAHA!

The Silent Crime
by John Rohan
(reference links to articles on original page)
http://shieldofachilles.blogspot.com...ent-crime.html

One good thing about writing my own weblog is that I get to choose
what I write about. And that means I can write about things that are
1) important, and 2) underreported elsewhere. I don't have a boss that
tells me to write about the current media darling of the week or about
subjects that have oversaturated the media everywhere else. This story
is a perfect case in point about what's wrong with the media today in
the US, and much of the rest of the world. Here is one of the worst,
if not the worst, criminal case you will ever read, but the wierd
thing is, the national media are ignoring it. Why is that?
Caution: very graphic details follow.

Hugh Christopher Newsom, Jr., 23, and Channon Gail Christian, 21,
lived in Knoxville, Tennessee. The couple was out on a date after
midnight on January 7, 2007, when they were carjacked and kidnapped at
gunpoint by four men, and later a woman as well. They were then driven
to another neighborhood, where over the next few days they were both
tortured, gang raped, and murdered. By some accounts they were
mutilated as well.

In front of Channon, Christopher was first tortured, beaten and gang-
raped by the men in turn. Then he was shot, body burned to conceal
evidence, wrapped in a blanket, and later dumped behind some railroad
tracks. Some accounts claim that his genitals were also cut off,
perhaps while he was still alive.

But believe it or not, Channon's fate was even worse. She was kept
alive for three more days, and repeatedly raped and tortured during
that time. The torture included beatings, forcing her to drink
cleaning fluid, urinating on her, and cutting off at least one of her
breasts. She was eventually murdered, and her body chopped up and
placed in five different garbage bags.

Fortunately, the perpetrators were caught relatively quickly. One left
his fingerprints inside Christian's vehicle, and when officers arrived
to question him, her body parts were found.

These grisly details are emerging now because the prosecutors have
completed their investigation and the defendants are awaiting trial.
So why has this received only local news coverage?

1) The victims are white while the four men and one woman accused in
the crime are all black

2) Because it doesn't involve any celebrities

Instead, during this period of time we have been inundated by the Duke
Rape Case fraud, Anna Nicole Smith death, and of course, the notorious
Paris Hilton DWI. Stories like these make it very clear what types of
crimes the media are interested in. There are also shades of the
Wichita murders of 2000, another horrific case that was totally
ignored by the media. Nicholas Stix at American Renaissance describes
this whole unfortunate situation perfectly. Charlie Daniels also
mentions it on his Soapbox, and there is a huge commentary at La Shawn
Barber's Corner.

All the above sites mention the racial angle, and they are correct. If
this was a white on black crime, you can bet every media outlet around
the country would have descended on the town. But they don't mention
the celebrity or notoriety angle. If these victims were the slightest
bit well-known, ie if they were wealthy or had ever appeared on
television, the media frenzy would also be in full swing.

On the other side of the coin, you have the despicable Svengalimedia,
a blatant white-hating web site with headlines like "I hope Prince
Harry dies in Iraq" or of one murdered white girl: "snooty slave
heiress deserves to be murdered by slave descendants". I refuse to
link to such an atrocious web site, but if you want to find it,
there's always Google or Yahoo. About this crime, their claim is that
Newsom and Christian actually wandered into a black area to buy drugs,
which is a common claim they make about almost all murdered whites.
But even if that were true (and no evidence for it anyway), how would
it justify a crime like this?

In any case, the media is not the only story here. Let's not forget
that two people were tortured and brutally murdered, and we are
fortunate that the perpetrators were found very quickly. My thoughts
and prayers go out to the Christian and Newsom families.

On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:23:20 -0500, Zoomz wrote:

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1

The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf


Any statistics from later than EIGHT YEARS AGO?

You got worse:

On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:23:20 -0500, Zoomz wrote:

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1

The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf


Any statistics from later than EIGHT YEARS AGO?

Homicide Offending Rates per 100,000 Population by Age, Race and
Gender


White Male Black Male White Female Black Female
14-17 18-24 25+ 14-17 18-24 25+ 14-17 18-24 25+ 14-17
18-24 25+
1976 10.9 21.0 8.9 80.4 180.9 100.8 1.4 2.5 1.5 11.1
29.5 22.1
1977 11.2 21.7 9.2 73.8 169.8 96.3 1.3 2.6 1.4 7.0 29.9
21.0
1978 10.9 23.6 9.5 70.1 178.4 96.2 1.1 2.6 1.3 7.7 27.4
19.2
1979 13.5 26.8 10.2 78.7 197.7 101.6 1.1 2.8 1.5 9.0
27.0 18.8
1980 13.9 30.1 11.4 83.8 212.4 108.8 1.0 2.9 1.6 8.1
32.5 19.5
1981 11.6 27.1 10.8 82.8 185.9 96.6 1.2 2.5 1.5 8.1 23.9
17.6
1982 11.6 24.5 10.4 69.3 174.8 85.1 1.2 2.6 1.4 5.9 24.1
15.1
1983 10.9 23.9 9.5 57.4 150.2 76.2 1.5 2.3 1.3 7.2 21.9
13.1
1984 10.0 25.2 9.6 52.7 130.0 71.5 1.2 2.7 1.2 6.0 18.5
12.4
1985 10.4 23.2 9.3 69.0 143.4 68.8 .9 2.5 1.2 7.1 18.0
12.0
1986 12.9 25.1 9.5 80.1 162.1 77.0 1.2 2.2 1.2 5.6 20.2
12.7
1987 11.8 24.4 9.3 87.5 177.9 69.3 1.3 2.5 1.2 6.8 16.5
11.1
1988 14.6 23.2 8.8 125.3 219.2 72.6 1.0 2.5 1.1 7.5 20.5
10.2
1989 16.8 26.8 8.6 135.3 250.4 67.8 1.1 2.7 1.1 7.0 18.9
10.8
1990 22.0 30.9 9.2 194.5 290.7 70.3 1.5 2.8 1.1 6.9 19.1
10.1
1991 22.8 32.9 8.8 214.0 364.9 68.8 1.3 2.6 1.0 10.5
21.9 10.2
1992 23.3 31.8 8.0 208.9 326.1 65.5 1.4 2.3 .9 11.2 17.2
8.7
1993 22.8 32.7 7.8 253.1 362.3 60.7 1.3 2.2 1.1 9.2 20.0
8.1
1994 24.9 32.7 7.5 235.4 338.1 55.1 1.6 2.2 1.0 9.6 17.6
7.8
1995 22.0 32.1 7.2 178.8 301.0 51.2 1.3 2.1 .9 7.6 13.0
6.3
1996 18.3 31.6 6.4 143.3 282.4 47.2 1.8 2.7 .9 8.8 15.7
6.2
1997 16.3 29.5 5.9 116.9 252.5 45.1 1.5 2.8 .8 4.5 15.9
5.3
1998 14.2 29.8 6.1 80.5 226.9 39.6 1.2 2.5 .9 5.3 13.2
5.1
1999 10.6 24.9 5.4 68.4 212.7 36.3 1.4 2.4 .8 6.1 10.7
4.3
2000 8.1 24.6 5.4 63.5 211.1 38.0 1.2 2.0 .8 5.2 11.4
4.0
2001 8.2 26.1 5.4 61.0 207.0 38.8 1.0 2.2 .7 5.2 12.6
4.2
2002 9.3 24.9 5.5 54.6 192.0 41.0 .9 2.6 .7 3.6 11.0 3.7
2003 7.7 23.2 5.5 58.2 199.2 39.6 1.3 2.3 .7 3.7 11.9
4.1
2004 8.7 22.9 5.6 59.7 184.5 38.0 .8 2.2 .8 2.7 9.8 3.9

(50% Black; 50% White; 100% Unqualified) wrote:

we are fortunate that the perpetrators were found very quickly. My
thoughts and prayers go out to the Christian and Newsom families.


So the perpetrators were found quickly and taken to jail? Good. And
this one case offsets the fact that you don't have any statistics newer
than eight years old?

88-LEROY KNEVIL-88 wrote:

ZOOMZ SOUNDS LIKE A FLY BUZZING AROUND ****


Right you are, but I'm trying not to fly TOO CLOSE to these guys.

not@work (Nobama) wrote:

You got worse:
Any statistics from later than EIGHT YEARS AGO?

Homicide Offending Rates per 100,000 Population by Age, Race and
Gender
White Male Black Male White Female Black Female
2004 8.7 22.9 5.6 59.7 184.5 38.0 .8 2.2 .8 2.7 9.8 3.9


Ok. So we're now only FOUR years out of date. Although a source for
your data might be helpful. Or did you get it from the -K-ings -K-rime
-K-lub stat site? It might also be helpful to know what COUNTRY the
stas were from.