NHS Trust suspends cervical cancer vaccinations after girl, 14, dies within hours of jab

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +0100, "john" wrote:

Anything but the vaccine: "Initial post mortem results suggested the
schoolgirl had a serious underlying health condition which meant it was
'unlikely' the vaccine had caused her death. "

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.

"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +0100, "john" wrote:

Anything but the vaccine: "Initial post mortem results suggested the
schoolgirl had a serious underlying health condition which meant it was
'unlikely' the vaccine had caused her death. "

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.


so you can die from a vaccine if you have a tumour

"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +0100, "john" wrote:

Anything but the vaccine: "Initial post mortem results suggested the
schoolgirl had a serious underlying health condition which meant it was
'unlikely' the vaccine had caused her death. "

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.
Oh PLEASE PLEASE post proof of that. While you are at it, post how you
gained acces to those records. I think you are lieing , but I want you to
have the chance to prove you are not.

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:05:55 +0100, "john" wrote:


"Peter Parry" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +0100, "john" wrote:

Anything but the vaccine: "Initial post mortem results suggested the
schoolgirl had a serious underlying health condition which meant it was
'unlikely' the vaccine had caused her death. "

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.


so you can die from a vaccine if you have a tumour


You can die from an airplane if it falls on you.
--

Jeden Tag werden 6000 Mädchen genital vernichtet.

http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_rr01.htm

"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +0100, "john" wrote:

Anything but the vaccine: "Initial post mortem results suggested the
schoolgirl had a serious underlying health condition which meant it was
'unlikely' the vaccine had caused her death. "

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.


So the 78 Gardasil deaths were all due to undiagnosed terminal
conditions?http://www.whale.to/vaccine/gardasil_deaths.html

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:58:19 -0500, "Smarter Than You"
wrote:

"Peter Parry" wrote

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.

Oh PLEASE PLEASE post proof of that.

It is widely reported
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8284517.stm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...r-vaccine.html
are but two of many.

While you are at it, post how you gained acces to those records.

The preliminary inquest, which is open to the public, was held in
Coventry today.

"Pathologist Alexander Kolar told the inquest that Natalie's chest was
"heavily infiltrated" by a tumour that had extended to the left lung.

The growth had compressed Natalie's aorta and pulmonary artery,
shutting off the blood supply to her entire body and causing her to
collapse.

He said: "It was so severe that death could have arrived at any time."
"

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:05:55 +0100, in misc.health.alternative, "john"
wrote:


"Peter Parry" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +0100, "john" wrote:

Anything but the vaccine: "Initial post mortem results suggested the
schoolgirl had a serious underlying health condition which meant it was
'unlikely' the vaccine had caused her death. "

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.


so you can die from a vaccine if you have a tumour

You can appear to die from breathing, if you have a tumor involving
the heart and lungs.

--
Bob Officer
Posting the truth
http://www.skeptics.com.au

"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:58:19 -0500, "Smarter Than You"
wrote:

"Peter Parry" wrote

The girl had an undiagnosed malignant chest tumour involving her
heart and lungs. She was undergoing a variety of tests to diagnose
her illness when she died.

Oh PLEASE PLEASE post proof of that.

It is widely reported
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8284517.stm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...r-vaccine.html
are but two of many.

While you are at it, post how you gained acces to those records.

The preliminary inquest, which is open to the public, was held in
Coventry today.

"Pathologist Alexander Kolar told the inquest that Natalie's chest was
"heavily infiltrated" by a tumour that had extended to the left lung.

The growth had compressed Natalie's aorta and pulmonary artery,
shutting off the blood supply to her entire body and causing her to
collapse.

He said: "It was so severe that death could have arrived at any time."
"
I do not have to believe what is "widely reported" Often those "reports"
are wrong or even false.

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:19:33 -0500, "Smarter Than You"
wrote:

I do not have to believe what is "widely reported"

Of course you don't.

Often those "reports" are wrong or even false.

Indeed, John posts many such "reports". However, in this case a
number of reporters from AP, Reuters, the BBC and the Times to name
but a few attended the inquest and have produced similar reports of
its preliminary findings. Whilst reporters frequently cock up science
reports in this case the evidence was brief and simple so even they
could get it right.

A formal statement has also been made
http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/09Septem...accine-QA.aspx

"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:19:33 -0500, "Smarter Than You"
wrote:

I do not have to believe what is "widely reported"

Of course you don't.

Often those "reports" are wrong or even false.

Indeed, John posts many such "reports". However, in this case a
number of reporters from AP, Reuters, the BBC and the Times to name
but a few attended the inquest and have produced similar reports of
its preliminary findings. Whilst reporters frequently cock up science
reports in this case the evidence was brief and simple so even they
could get it right.

You understand that I am proposeing that those interviewed might have
reason to not tell the truth? I do not care what the reporters say. They
only repeat what they are told. It smells fishy. Not that we can ever expect
to know the whole truth on this.