If'n yah don spank'um .....

.....they gonnah tern intah ignerun bums.

Isn't that the refrain...that spanking kids will make them better
people?

Seems there are folks that don't think so, and have done a bit of
inquiry into the subject.

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Oct05/r101005

Or they could turn out just like you! ;-)

Doan


On 10 Oct 2005 wrote:

....they gonnah tern intah ignerun bums.

Isn't that the refrain...that spanking kids will make them better
people?

Seems there are folks that don't think so, and have done a bit of
inquiry into the subject.

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Oct05/r101005

Doan Duy Trahn

You post to me privately again, and you can be assured, I'll be lodging
a formal complaint with department head...who, by the way, I know, and
with IT services for USC. Or you can apologize and explain yourself.

Figure out which key to hit, Monkeyboy. You of all people know how
serious an offense this is if one takes exception to a University
originated posting.

The following is an unsolicted msg:

"
X-Apparently-To: via 66.218.93.227; Mon, 10 Oct
2005 21:46:55 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [128.125.137.8]

[[[ Which of course is:
OrgName: University of Southern California
OrgID: USC-6
Address: 1020 West Jefferson Boulevard
City: Los Angeles
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90089-0251
Country: US ... the server of course is identified below, and you know
about those logs, dontcha monkeyboy? You gonna fiddle'em for safety
now? I wouldn't. ]]]

Return-Path:
Authentication-Results: mta131.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=usc.edu;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 128.125.137.8 (EHLO msg-mx3.usc.edu) (128.125.137.8)
with SMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:46:55 -0700
Received: from skat.usc.edu ([128.125.253.131]) by msg-mx3.usc.edu (Sun
Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.01 (built Sep 1 2005)) with ESMTP id
for ; Mon, 10
Oct 2005 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Doan"
Subject: If'n yah don spank'um .....
In-reply-to: .com
To:
Message-id:
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-Length: 638

Or they could turn into someone like you and Steve. ;-)
As for the study, did the "folks" compare spanking and
the alternatives? In other words, are the alternatives
any better than spanking under the same statistical
analysis? Can you ask LaVonne for the studies she
posted "numerous times"? ;-)

Doan
"
No, since she has. And you may do your own lying. I won't lie for you.

0:-


On 10 Oct 2005 wrote:

....they gonnah tern intah ignerun bums.

Isn't that the refrain...that spanking kids will make them better
people?

Seems there are folks that don't think so, and have done a bit of
inquiry into the subject.

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Oct05/r101005







Doan wrote:
Or they could turn out just like you! ;-)

Doan


On 10 Oct 2005 wrote:

....they gonnah tern intah ignerun bums.

Isn't that the refrain...that spanking kids will make them better
people?

Seems there are folks that don't think so, and have done a bit of
inquiry into the subject.

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Oct05/r101005

My mistake. It's meant to go the newsgroup, not to you "privately".

Doan


On 11 Oct 2005 wrote:

Doan Duy Trahn

You post to me privately again, and you can be assured, I'll be lodging
a formal complaint with department head...who, by the way, I know, and
with IT services for USC. Or you can apologize and explain yourself.

Figure out which key to hit, Monkeyboy. You of all people know how
serious an offense this is if one takes exception to a University
originated posting.

The following is an unsolicted msg:

"
X-Apparently-To: via 66.218.93.227; Mon, 10 Oct
2005 21:46:55 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [128.125.137.8]

[[[ Which of course is:
OrgName: University of Southern California
OrgID: USC-6
Address: 1020 West Jefferson Boulevard
City: Los Angeles
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90089-0251
Country: US ... the server of course is identified below, and you know
about those logs, dontcha monkeyboy? You gonna fiddle'em for safety
now? I wouldn't. ]]]

Return-Path:
Authentication-Results: mta131.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=usc.edu;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 128.125.137.8 (EHLO msg-mx3.usc.edu) (128.125.137.8)
with SMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:46:55 -0700
Received: from skat.usc.edu ([128.125.253.131]) by msg-mx3.usc.edu (Sun
Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.01 (built Sep 1 2005)) with ESMTP id
for ; Mon, 10
Oct 2005 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Doan"
Subject: If'n yah don spank'um .....
In-reply-to: .com
To:
Message-id:
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-Length: 638

Or they could turn into someone like you and Steve. ;-)
As for the study, did the "folks" compare spanking and
the alternatives? In other words, are the alternatives
any better than spanking under the same statistical
analysis? Can you ask LaVonne for the studies she
posted "numerous times"? ;-)

Doan
"
No, since she has. And you may do your own lying. I won't lie for you.

0:-


On 10 Oct 2005 wrote:

....they gonnah tern intah ignerun bums.

Isn't that the refrain...that spanking kids will make them better
people?

Seems there are folks that don't think so, and have done a bit of
inquiry into the subject.

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Oct05/r101005







Doan wrote:
Or they could turn out just like you! ;-)

Doan


On 10 Oct 2005 wrote:

....they gonnah tern intah ignerun bums.

Isn't that the refrain...that spanking kids will make them better
people?

Seems there are folks that don't think so, and have done a bit of
inquiry into the subject.

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Oct05/r101005

Or they could turn into someone like you and Steve. ;-)
As for the study, did the "folks" compare spanking and
the alternatives? In other words, are the alternatives
any better than spanking under the same statistical
analysis? Can you ask LaVonne for the studies she
posted "numerous times"? ;-)

Doan
"
No, since she has. And you may do your own lying. I won't lie for you.

0:-

LOL! But you lied for LaVonne. ;-) Now, where are those "studies"?
Maybe she can pass it on to Dr. Larzelere. ;-)

Doan

Doan wrote:

...........poof!............aw gone......

"I'm a dancing Muuuuuuuuuunkey, I'm a dancing Muuuuuuuuuunkey."

R R R R R