If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Rambler wrote: 'Kate wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:34 +0800, Rambler the following was posted in blue crayon: Go ahead, you can have the last word. I know that is important to you. What an angry man. Come on, you've got to have a better last word than that, don't you? I mean this one is so ... so ... transparent. Not being able to answer a single thing, you delved quickly into name calling. I mean, I figured as the self made representative of a superior class, you could at least come up with something witty, something stinging, something provocative or even downright intelligent, as opposed to a trite fallback. Perhaps a huddle with V the feminist lawyer want-to-be is in order. You can take the family therapist student role, and she can take the law student role. (Oh, btw, if you truly are studying to be a family therapist, I would think again ... way to many issues and labels for you to be of help to somebody ... I mean, wouldn't it be the angry men that you were trying to save to save marriage ... or would those be a convenient excuse in your practive ....). Come on, one more for the Gipper .... Rambler And Rambler... grin You're just as much to blame. Both of you... Cut out the condescension and the cleverly-worded name-calling and go to your corners. rj |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
'Kate wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:34 +0800, Rambler the following was posted in blue crayon: Go ahead, you can have the last word. I know that is important to you. What an angry man. 'Kate sigh... And what an angry woman. I was finding this exchange to be both intelligent (a rarity on usenet) and stimulating. Then somewhere along the way it degenerated into finger-pointing and name-calling. A pity... rj |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
'Kate wrote: On 30 Mar 2005 23:02:07 -0800, "rj" the following was posted in blue crayon: 'Kate wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:34 +0800, Rambler the following was posted in blue crayon: Go ahead, you can have the last word. I know that is important to you. What an angry man. 'Kate sigh... And what an angry woman. Actually, I'm laughing at this. I can't believe his cover story. It's too funny. I was finding this exchange to be both intelligent (a rarity on usenet) and stimulating. Then somewhere along the way it degenerated into finger-pointing and name-calling. A pity... rj Actually, I was too. Too bad Rambler couldn't keep up. 'Kate Stop it, I say! Stop it! rj |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
'Kate wrote:
On 30 Mar 2005 23:02:07 -0800, "rj" the following was posted in blue crayon: 'Kate wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:34 +0800, Rambler the following was posted in blue crayon: Go ahead, you can have the last word. I know that is important to you. What an angry man. 'Kate sigh... And what an angry woman. Actually, I'm laughing at this. I can't believe his cover story. It's too funny. I was finding this exchange to be both intelligent (a rarity on usenet) and stimulating. Then somewhere along the way it degenerated into finger-pointing and name-calling. A pity... rj rj, For some reason your posts are not getting through on my server (and there it was I thought you were ignoring me). Just checked to make sure I hadn't accidentally filtered you, and I haven't, so wondering if you've changed servers or something? Thought I would point it out. Rambler (Ms. Gotalltheanswers' response isn't worth my time - still didn't get a good last line from her though. I can see how one morphs over to "the Dark Side" if that was the type of discourse one engages the opposite gender in though. I'm glad ASD has some very intelligent and knowledgable women in it). |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
'Kate wrote:
You obviously couldn't follow the original conversation, got all flustered, and attacked. Oh well.. that's usenet for ya [sic]. rofl ... actually, what you should perhaps do is go back up-thread seven posts when, to refute an argument, you wrote "I see that this is just another "I'm right and you're a woman" posts." You lost right there. The argument, credibility. You name it. Your follow-on responses continued to drill nails in your coffin, terminating with how anybody that can hold a conversation that you can't follow or understand due to a lack of experience is an "angry man" - disingenuous. Nobody was calling you names, even though you had been doing it to a variety of posters with a "there is intelligent life out there" and "the person I origninally responded to seemed intelligent." You have a problem with intelligence it seems. You're not very subtle, and you are very sarcastic. I know. I can be very sarcastic as well. You had a discussion going, but it seems you couldn't keep up, so instead it appears you went down the "I'm smarter than you and you're just plain not listening because you're angry" route. Hey, that's fine - you can operate in your own world. The only one that loses is you. But for your own personal growth, I would suggest that you pull your head out of your back pocket and take a strong look at the statements that you are making ... and see how they apply to you. Not just from a discussion standpoint, but from your interaction on an intimate level as well. I can now better understand your comment about perhaps never getting married again. It's tough when you've got limited experience (I'll figure that you're in your early/mid 20's) but even my 10 year old daughter has learned calm discussion in emotional situations. We just had one of those and she came through with absolute flying colours over a period of several days, even though she and I were on opposites sides of the discussion and she ultimately got what (she thinks) she wanted. Good luck Kate. I really think you'll need it. Rambler |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Rambler wrote: 'Kate wrote: On 30 Mar 2005 23:02:07 -0800, "rj" the following was posted in blue crayon: 'Kate wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:34 +0800, Rambler the following was posted in blue crayon: Go ahead, you can have the last word. I know that is important to you. What an angry man. 'Kate sigh... And what an angry woman. Actually, I'm laughing at this. I can't believe his cover story. It's too funny. I was finding this exchange to be both intelligent (a rarity on usenet) and stimulating. Then somewhere along the way it degenerated into finger-pointing and name-calling. A pity... rj rj, For some reason your posts are not getting through on my server (and there it was I thought you were ignoring me). Just checked to make sure I hadn't accidentally filtered you, and I haven't, so wondering if you've changed servers or something? Thought I would point it out. Nope. Nothing has changed. I do post from both a personal dial-up account using a *good* newsreader (when I'm at home) and also from a corporate account using Google (like now). Rambler (Ms. Gotalltheanswers' response isn't worth my time - still didn't get a good last line from her though. I can see how one morphs over to "the Dark Side" if that was the type of discourse one engages the opposite gender in though. I'm glad ASD has some very intelligent and knowledgable women in it). wags finger Stop it, I say! Stop it! rj |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
"V" wrote in message ... "Cloaked" wrote in message ... SNIP So you are accusing him of being a cheater? Rather presumptuous, wouldn't you say? Sounds like something a femminist lawyer would come out with. snip Hey, hey.....watch it....everyone move out of here.......there is nothing to see here....psst....hey you...yeah..you mister...with the loin cloth and knuckles dragging as you gait slowly....yeah...you... Ahem...you gotta problem with feminist lawyers? V, who is a feminist and working on being a lawyer Speaking only for myself, admission of feminism completely eliminates credibility. Phil #3 |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
"Phil #3" wrote in message news:hGT2e.8212snip Speaking only for myself, admission of feminism completely eliminates credibility. Phil #3 Yes, speaking only for yourself. Anyone else agree with Phil #3? V |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
"Rambler" wrote in message ... snip It's because I'm a man, isn't it, one of those horrible wretches who put you in your current positon. I can take it .., I'm used to getting picked on. Rambler snip Kate lost her husband to death. We do not think men are bad people. Actually we love men who have accountability. Your childhood and being picked on has nothing to do with this group. Why are you used to being picked on? You should seek therapy for being so darn angry! V |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
"Rambler" wrote in message ... 'Kate wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:34 +0800, Rambler the following was posted in blue crayon: Go ahead, you can have the last word. I know that is important to you. What an angry man. Come on, you've got to have a better last word than that, don't you? I mean this one is so ... so ... transparent. Not being able to answer a single thing, you delved quickly into name calling. I mean, I figured as the self made representative of a superior class, you could at least come up with something witty, something stinging, something provocative or even downright intelligent, as opposed to a trite fallback. Perhaps a huddle with V the feminist lawyer want-to-be is in order. You can take the family therapist student role, and she can take the law student role. (Oh, btw, if you truly are studying to be a family therapist, I would think again ... way to many issues and labels for you to be of help to somebody ... I mean, wouldn't it be the angry men that you were trying to save to save marriage ... or would those be a convenient excuse in your practive ...). Come on, one more for the Gipper .... Rambler I have a new name..."V the feminist lawyer want to be" BAH. I can not wait to tell my wittle fwends at the prescwool....I met a meanie on usenet who dislike feminists lawyer wanna bes...... lol V |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
State warns county about deadbeat parent ads/10-2 | Dave Briggman | Child Support | 0 | October 2nd 04 01:19 AM |
In Defense of 'Deadbeat Dads | Don | Child Support | 8 | August 12th 04 07:17 AM |
Deadbeat Fathers are a growing problem throughout the region | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 5 | November 12th 03 02:33 AM |
Deadbeat Parent Finder Service | infopro | Child Support | 21 | October 6th 03 04:38 PM |
Boksa, birth insults and schizophrenia (also: Gastaldo 'you ignorant asshole' --Allen D. Radant, MD) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | July 14th 03 11:01 PM |