If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
In article ,
Roger Schlafly wrote: "David Wright" wrote That's the AMA, JG. I was looking for something coming from, let's say, Merck. Yes, David.... What part of "I'll do some checking regarding the pharmas, but it's undeniable that medial associations are working to see religious and philosophical exemptions removed" didn't you understand? I was thinking more in terms of Roger's original accusations. Are you doubting that Merck lobbies for removing those vaccine exemptions? Do you think the Merck lobbies for expanding those exemptions? If you have some contrary info or opinions, go ahead and post them. Ah, Roger, I see the long layoff from the newsgroup has not dulled your well-honed weaselling abilities. But I'm not going to let you get away with it. It's not up to me to disprove your assertions, it's up to you to prove them. If you had any actual evidence, you'd have posted it by now. Instead, I get the usual Schlafly drivel: "are you doubting blah blah blah". Doesn't matter. You're making a claim -- either back it up, or be revealed, once again, as the windbag you are. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
"David Wright" wrote
It's not up to me to disprove your assertions, it's up to you to prove them. Sorry, but I am not obligated to prove everything I post. If Merck put all its lobbying positions on its web site, then I would just refer you to its web site. It doesn't. If you want to doubt what I say, go ahead. If you have contrary evidence, then post it. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
"Happy Dog" wrote
Sorry, but I am not obligated to prove everything I post. those who haven't, I present two examples of your BS debating tactics for the enjoyment of anyone who thinks that you do a great disservice to mankind Curious examples. One of them appears to be an example of David Wright being unable to substantiate a claim that he made. The other is H.Dog trying to badger me into saying that peds are evil. Then he accuses me of being evasive when I deny that peds are evil. I repeat: I do not think that peds are evil! I have answered many questions from H.Dog, but he never seems to be able to get to the point. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
"Roger Schlafly" wrote in message
et... "Happy Dog" wrote Sorry, but I am not obligated to prove everything I post. those who haven't, I present two examples of your BS debating tactics for the enjoyment of anyone who thinks that you do a great disservice to mankind Curious examples. One of them appears to be an example of David Wright being unable to substantiate a claim that he made. Only to you. The other is H.Dog trying to badger me into saying that peds are evil. Then he accuses me of being evasive when I deny that peds are evil. I repeat: I do not think that peds are evil! You're such a loser. Unless you deny saying the following, you have no case... "For the most part, those promoting vaccines here are pediatricians and drug company lobbyists. They are acting in their financial interests." I have answered many questions from H.Dog, but he never seems to be able to get to the point. Godlike. le moo |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
"Roger Schlafly" wrote in message et... "David Wright" wrote It's not up to me to disprove your assertions, it's up to you to prove them. Sorry, but I am not obligated to prove everything I post. If Merck put all its lobbying positions on its web site, then I would just refer you to its web site. It doesn't. If you want to doubt what I say, go ahead. If you have contrary evidence, then post it. I interpret the above paragraph as: "I cannot prove or support what I said, but somehow it is your fault." Wrong Roger. You said that the drug lobby is doing something. You have failed to provide evidence that it is. When you make a claim and others question it, it is up to you to provide evidence to support your claim. Otherwise, your claim is essentially disproven. Jeff |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
"Jeff Utz" wrote
You said that the drug lobby is doing something. You have failed to provide evidence that it is. Take a wild guess. Do you think that the drug companies are for or against the vaccine mandates? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
"Roger Schlafly" wrote in message et... "Jeff Utz" wrote You said that the drug lobby is doing something. You have failed to provide evidence that it is. Take a wild guess. Do you think that the drug companies are for or against the vaccine mandates? I don't know. They could be against them, because they fear a backlash or lawsuits from people and realize that the vast majority of parents understand that their kids are protected by vaccines and are better off with them than without them. I am not in the legal, marketing or lobbying department (or any other department) of any of the vaccine companies. Anyway, you made a claim, so it is up to you to back up your claim. Your unsubstantiated guess does not count. All the best, Jeff |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
In article ,
Roger Schlafly wrote: "David Wright" wrote It's not up to me to disprove your assertions, it's up to you to prove them. Sorry, but I am not obligated to prove everything I post. Anyone who has taken even a casual interest in your posting history is well aware that you are a blowhard who likes to make sweeping statements that he can't back up. When called on this behavior, as you invariably are, you invariably attempt to muddy the waters. This never fools anyone, but you keep trying anyway. If Merck put all its lobbying positions on its web site, then I would just refer you to its web site. It doesn't. If you want to doubt what I say, go ahead. Oh, I doubt most everything you say. Your consistent lack of evidence is one of your defining traits. If you have contrary evidence, then post it. The fact that you have no evidence is enough for me. I don't doubt that Merck would be pleased if there were fewer vaccine exemptions, but whether its worth their while (on a cost/benefit basis) to lobby for such changes is an open question. A question that Roger the Blowhard will do nothing to answer. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
In article ,
Tsu Dho Nimh wrote: (David Wright) wrote: The fact that you have no evidence is enough for me. I don't doubt that Merck would be pleased if there were fewer vaccine exemptions, but whether its worth their while (on a cost/benefit basis) to lobby for such changes is an open question. Well, what brings in the most money to the Evil Organized Medicine Conspiracy: A $20 vaccine given during a $100 office visit or a kid in intensive care for three weeks with whooping cough? And to top it off, the hospitalized individual will be treated with many medications, made by the same companies that makes vaccines, and costing a hell of a lot more. The idea that vaccines are better for the bottom line than no vaccines is merely idiotic. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
More U.S. Children Vaccinated Than Ever
In article ,
Jeff Utz wrote: "Roger Schlafly" wrote in message . net... "Jeff Utz" wrote You said that the drug lobby is doing something. You have failed to provide evidence that it is. Take a wild guess. Do you think that the drug companies are for or against the vaccine mandates? I don't know. They could be against them, because they fear a backlash or lawsuits from people and realize that the vast majority of parents understand that their kids are protected by vaccines and are better off with them than without them. I am not in the legal, marketing or lobbying department (or any other department) of any of the vaccine companies. If making vaccines was so marvelously profitable, nobody would get out of the business. And yet we do see various pharmaceutical companies getting out of the vaccine business, even though vaccine usage is at an all-time high in the US. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HALF OF KIDS IN FOSTER CARE NEEDLESSLY | Malev | General | 0 | December 12th 03 03:53 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Helping Your Child Be Healthy and Fit sX3#;WA@'U | John Smith | Kids Health | 0 | July 20th 03 04:50 AM |