If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Three Kids? You Showoffs
I thought this article was amusing. Of course raising children costs
money, but I don't think parents should be discouraged from having more than two, unless they are on welfare. One of my wife's sisters even suggested abortion when my wife was pregnant with her 3rd child, just because three children would be difficult to "manage" with both of us working. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...403217_pf.html Three Kids? You Showoffs. By Pamela Paul Washington Post, Sunday, April 6, 2008; B02 My husband and I are getting ready to do what many couples in these brink-of-recessionary times would consider unthinkable. No, we're not buying a Martha's Vineyard retreat or planning a month in St. Bart's or eco-decorating our house. We're planning to have a third child. What shocks people, when we tell them, isn't the thought of hauling three kids onto a place for a vacation, or even the idea of coming home every night to a houseful of runny noses and homework assignments. What gets them is the sheer financial audacity. Raising kids today costs a fortune. Last month, the Department of Agriculture estimated that each American child costs an average of $204,060 to house, clothe, educate and entertain until the age of 18. But to me, a family with just two kids seems minimalist, and even a bit sad. Back in the 1970s, when my husband and I were born, sprawling families were more common. My husband had two sisters and, following a Brady-Bunchy set of remarriages in my family, I wound up with seven brothers, real and step. I've always fantasized about creating a "Meet Me in St. Louis"-style household of my own, with children constantly underfoot and enough relatives around to skip to my lou en masse. And yet nowadays, people seem aghast if a couple wants more than two children. When Elana Sigall, a 43-year-old attorney in Brooklyn, was pregnant with her third, people came up to her constantly, she said, to admonish her: "You've got a boy and a girl already. Why don't you just leave it alone?" What's worse, the desire to have another child opens one up to charges of elitism and status consciousness. rest snipped |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Three Kids? You Showoffs
Beliavsky wrote:
I thought this article was amusing. Of course raising children costs money, but I don't think parents should be discouraged from having more than two, unless they are on welfare. One of my wife's sisters even suggested abortion when my wife was pregnant with her 3rd child, just because three children would be difficult to "manage" with both of us working. I'd have loved to have had 3, and my husband would have liked 5. Unfortunately, when you have #1 at 42, you're kind of limited. Clisby http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...403217_pf.html Three Kids? You Showoffs. By Pamela Paul Washington Post, Sunday, April 6, 2008; B02 My husband and I are getting ready to do what many couples in these brink-of-recessionary times would consider unthinkable. No, we're not buying a Martha's Vineyard retreat or planning a month in St. Bart's or eco-decorating our house. We're planning to have a third child. What shocks people, when we tell them, isn't the thought of hauling three kids onto a place for a vacation, or even the idea of coming home every night to a houseful of runny noses and homework assignments. What gets them is the sheer financial audacity. Raising kids today costs a fortune. Last month, the Department of Agriculture estimated that each American child costs an average of $204,060 to house, clothe, educate and entertain until the age of 18. But to me, a family with just two kids seems minimalist, and even a bit sad. Back in the 1970s, when my husband and I were born, sprawling families were more common. My husband had two sisters and, following a Brady-Bunchy set of remarriages in my family, I wound up with seven brothers, real and step. I've always fantasized about creating a "Meet Me in St. Louis"-style household of my own, with children constantly underfoot and enough relatives around to skip to my lou en masse. And yet nowadays, people seem aghast if a couple wants more than two children. When Elana Sigall, a 43-year-old attorney in Brooklyn, was pregnant with her third, people came up to her constantly, she said, to admonish her: "You've got a boy and a girl already. Why don't you just leave it alone?" What's worse, the desire to have another child opens one up to charges of elitism and status consciousness. rest snipped |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Three Kids? You Showoffs
"Beliavsky" wrote in message
... I thought this article was amusing. Of course raising children costs money, but I don't think parents should be discouraged from having more than two, unless they are on welfare. One of my wife's sisters even suggested abortion when my wife was pregnant with her 3rd child, just because three children would be difficult to "manage" with both of us working. We were in an Aldi's store when I was pregnant with #3 when an elderly couple asked us, "Don't you know what causes that?" It was later when I thought of a great answer, "Yeah, F*cking causes that." I wouldn't actually say that out loud though but I really wanted to once I thought of it. Marie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kids and Cell phone - How technology separated parent and kids | vee | Foster Parents | 0 | June 12th 07 04:21 AM |
Kids and Cell phone - How technology separated parent and kids | safiyyah | General | 0 | June 11th 07 09:49 AM |