If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Is a dead foster kid rolled up in the closet a horror story?
On Dec 26, 3:21 pm, Greegor wrote:
On Dec 26, 2:03 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Dec 26, 2:10 pm, Greegor wrote: On Dec 26, 12:35 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Dec 25, 8:56 pm, Greegor wrote: On Dec 23, 9:09 am, "dragonsgirl" wrote: The article, Greg, was about the judge having concerns that he may not be capable of being fair when hearing the case. Do you think that the judge, recognizing that it was possible that his prior relationship with the defendant, was a CPS horror story? The hearing would not be taking place AT ALL except there is a dispute about the plea/immunity deals made. As usual, greg you fail to comprehend the situation. There was an immunity deal made in Ohio. There is a claim that a similar deal was also made in Kentucky. Particularly since two adjacent states were involved. Can a person get immunity from two states at once if they turn states evidence to make a case? Two different states, two different jurisdictions. Judges are supposed to avoid even the hint of a conflict so asking the question even reveals a problem. You're such a moron, greg. Amy Baker was given immunity in Ohio in exchange for her testimony that was used to convict David and Liz Carroll. It was only after Baker's statement revealed the ashes of the child were dumped into Kentucky jurisdiction that the question of the second state's alleged immunity deal became an issue. DS IOW if the ashes were dumped in Ohio DS none of this would be taking place. If the KY dumping wasn't known then why was OHIO Mason County Attorney John Estill involved? (You didn't really READ the article did you Dan?) DS The Ohio Judge is NOT clairvoyant! DS Do you really expect him to be? G Did you actually READ this, Dan? Yes. From the original news story: However, Ohio prosecutors have come to Baker's defense and claim Mason County Attorney John Estill kind of, sort of, maybe also agreed not to prosecute Baker. Estill says that isn't so. For the record, we tend to believe him. Nevertheless, Baker's defense attorneys have not only asked Wood to decide if Estill is lying but also whether Baker's words spoken in testimony at the foster parent's trial can be used against her in Kentucky. Once the question of Estill's credibility was raised, Wood realized he would be asked to rule on more than legalities in the case. He would, in essence, be expected to rule on his former law partner's truthfulness. Not only did Baker and Estill once practice law in the same firm, Estill remains a law partner with Wood's uncle. The judge must have realized his ability to remain unbiased would be brought into question. DS Your point is? DS And I still ask you, do you think the Judge is clairvoyant? You didn't read the original news article did you Dan? Sure I did and you still didn't say what your point is, greg. Is there any hard evidence that an immunity deal in Kentucky was given to Baker? Why would Baker be given an immunity deal from Kentucky when it wasn't revealed till she testified under an Ohio immunity deal that part of the crime took place in Kentucky? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Judgment call? | fx | Spanking | 3 | December 26th 07 06:14 PM |
call me??? | [email protected] | Spanking | 0 | May 26th 06 10:37 PM |
Judgment Day; a Perspective | MichaelLikeGod@Heaven | Single Parents | 14 | March 13th 06 02:45 AM |
Will She Call 911 on You? | Dusty | Child Support | 7 | November 14th 05 04:55 PM |
Will She Call 911 on You? | Tracy | Child Support | 1 | November 11th 05 05:47 AM |