If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a
child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
These statistics don't give a lot of information. For example, what does it
mean by "costs of raising a child"? At $9380 per year, a family with 4 children would have to make a minimum of $37520 per year just to support the children, not including the adult's expenses. There are many families in my area who make far less than that who are raising 4 children, and are not even qualified for the government's free lunch program. So, until the government lists exactly what expenses they consider in these statistics, and how much each one costs, the stats are meaningless. As for the "who-paid-what" info, I told you in another post that my husband is in the "didn't pay it all" column because he has arrearages--even though he pays every penny every year! Statistics are very often used for deceptive purposes to satisfy government (and other) agendas. "Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message ... As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
"Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message ... As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. TJ - You posted this 2 weeks ago and never attempted to refute the facts these numbers are for after tax spending. So once again, if the actual cost of raising a child is $168,840 after taxes, and the average tax payer family pays 28% Federal tax, 9% state tax, and 7.65% FICA/Medicare tax, the net income required to raise one child is $305,040. And since the average family has 1.6 children the net cost for the average family would be $488,064. How can any family afford to have children if these numbers are right? In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. You are mixing net and gross income/CS numbers as if they are the same thing. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Since mothers on welfare do not receive the CS paid to the state to reimburse welfare payments, and state pass-throughs were eliminated in the last Welfare Reform Act, a huge percentage of the difference between the $19 billion and $32.3 billion is not accounted for because the state receives the money instead of the CP's who are surveyed. This is a serious flaw that makes forming conclusions about how much CS is really received by mothers suspect. Look at the note on page 1 of the report. It very clearly notes that CS payments to TANF recipients are under reported. Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. You have made a serious error in what all the above means. The report you have cited is based on a survey of CP's asking them about how much was ordered and how much was RECEIVED. The assumption that means this report is definitive about how much was PAID is erroneous. The flaws in this logic are many. The NCP's weren't asked how much they paid, state welfare reimbursements are ignored, orders not yet in full affect are included, orders no longer in affect are included, CP's without formal court CS orders have had their reported amount estimated and included, and orders for adult children receiving college support are mixed in with the under 18 orders. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
Sorry, BOB. Im not TJ. I just got this off some website that had
everything laid out as such. Not from a "report". "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message nk.net... "Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message ... As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. TJ - You posted this 2 weeks ago and never attempted to refute the facts these numbers are for after tax spending. So once again, if the actual cost of raising a child is $168,840 after taxes, and the average tax payer family pays 28% Federal tax, 9% state tax, and 7.65% FICA/Medicare tax, the net income required to raise one child is $305,040. And since the average family has 1.6 children the net cost for the average family would be $488,064. How can any family afford to have children if these numbers are right? In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. You are mixing net and gross income/CS numbers as if they are the same thing. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Since mothers on welfare do not receive the CS paid to the state to reimburse welfare payments, and state pass-throughs were eliminated in the last Welfare Reform Act, a huge percentage of the difference between the $19 billion and $32.3 billion is not accounted for because the state receives the money instead of the CP's who are surveyed. This is a serious flaw that makes forming conclusions about how much CS is really received by mothers suspect. Look at the note on page 1 of the report. It very clearly notes that CS payments to TANF recipients are under reported. Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. You have made a serious error in what all the above means. The report you have cited is based on a survey of CP's asking them about how much was ordered and how much was RECEIVED. The assumption that means this report is definitive about how much was PAID is erroneous. The flaws in this logic are many. The NCP's weren't asked how much they paid, state welfare reimbursements are ignored, orders not yet in full affect are included, orders no longer in affect are included, CP's without formal court CS orders have had their reported amount estimated and included, and orders for adult children receiving college support are mixed in with the under 18 orders. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
That's the lifetime cost to the average family per child till 18.
Bob Whiteside wrote: "Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message ... As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. TJ - You posted this 2 weeks ago and never attempted to refute the facts these numbers are for after tax spending. So once again, if the actual cost of raising a child is $168,840 after taxes, and the average tax payer family pays 28% Federal tax, 9% state tax, and 7.65% FICA/Medicare tax, the net income required to raise one child is $305,040. And since the average family has 1.6 children the net cost for the average family would be $488,064. How can any family afford to have children if these numbers are right? In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. You are mixing net and gross income/CS numbers as if they are the same thing. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Since mothers on welfare do not receive the CS paid to the state to reimburse welfare payments, and state pass-throughs were eliminated in the last Welfare Reform Act, a huge percentage of the difference between the $19 billion and $32.3 billion is not accounted for because the state receives the money instead of the CP's who are surveyed. This is a serious flaw that makes forming conclusions about how much CS is really received by mothers suspect. Look at the note on page 1 of the report. It very clearly notes that CS payments to TANF recipients are under reported. Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. You have made a serious error in what all the above means. The report you have cited is based on a survey of CP's asking them about how much was ordered and how much was RECEIVED. The assumption that means this report is definitive about how much was PAID is erroneous. The flaws in this logic are many. The NCP's weren't asked how much they paid, state welfare reimbursements are ignored, orders not yet in full affect are included, orders no longer in affect are included, CP's without formal court CS orders have had their reported amount estimated and included, and orders for adult children receiving college support are mixed in with the under 18 orders. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
"Virginia" wrote in message news That's the lifetime cost to the average family per child till 18. You are correct with one caveate. These are the estimated lifetime expenditures on children for the lowest income group reported in the Expenditures on Children by Families annual report. The 2001 report shows the lowest income families earn less than $39,100 and their average income is $24,400. The 2001 lifetime cost for one child born to the lowest income families is estimated to be $169,920 for this income group. How can a family averaging $24,400 gross income per year before taxes afford to have even one child? Using the government's numbers, a child born in 2001 will cost $6,490 net for that year. Even assuming the average family pays no federal or state income taxes, they will net $22,533 after FICA/Medicare, which means one child will cost them 28.8% of their net income. Projected out at the same 3.4% inflation rate used for the child's expenses, that same fanily family will earn $43,076 in 2018. After FICA/Medicare only that family will have a net income of $39,780. The government says the same child will cost $13,210 in 2018 which means the family will spend 33.2% of their net income on the child. (Of course, the percentages of net spent to raise a child goes up if a family pays any income taxes.) And these calcualtions don't even factor in the average family has 1.6 children, which means the percentage of family net income needed to raise 1.6 children is well over 50% of net income, and even higher when income taxes are paid, or that .6 child is really factored in as 1 whole second child in a family. These numbers suggest either the government has over-inflated the cost of raising a child for political purposes, or families need to stop having children because they are way too expensive to raise. Bob Whiteside wrote: "Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message ... As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. TJ - You posted this 2 weeks ago and never attempted to refute the facts these numbers are for after tax spending. So once again, if the actual cost of raising a child is $168,840 after taxes, and the average tax payer family pays 28% Federal tax, 9% state tax, and 7.65% FICA/Medicare tax, the net income required to raise one child is $305,040. And since the average family has 1.6 children the net cost for the average family would be $488,064. How can any family afford to have children if these numbers are right? In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. You are mixing net and gross income/CS numbers as if they are the same thing. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Since mothers on welfare do not receive the CS paid to the state to reimburse welfare payments, and state pass-throughs were eliminated in the last Welfare Reform Act, a huge percentage of the difference between the $19 billion and $32.3 billion is not accounted for because the state receives the money instead of the CP's who are surveyed. This is a serious flaw that makes forming conclusions about how much CS is really received by mothers suspect. Look at the note on page 1 of the report. It very clearly notes that CS payments to TANF recipients are under reported. Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. You have made a serious error in what all the above means. The report you have cited is based on a survey of CP's asking them about how much was ordered and how much was RECEIVED. The assumption that means this report is definitive about how much was PAID is erroneous. The flaws in this logic are many. The NCP's weren't asked how much they paid, state welfare reimbursements are ignored, orders not yet in full affect are included, orders no longer in affect are included, CP's without formal court CS orders have had their reported amount estimated and included, and orders for adult children receiving college support are mixed in with the under 18 orders. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
And of course they don't account for that which other family members
provide etc of that amount. Both sets of our parents spend about 1/3 of what we do on the girls as well, so in essence we only pay 3/5-3/4 of the amount the gov't thinks we are solely responsible for spending. then there's Christmas Hanukkah etc, in which we spend less than our relatives by hitting sales and clearence racks all year and storring for holidays. Mostly I think that alot of money from tax credits, social services assistance etc doesn't get counted as income. we don't spend anywere near $6,500 a year apiece for our girls and we homeschool so I think it's all relative to the thriftiness and location of the parents. Oh yeah with the average person's credit card debt it is possible that people are spending more than they make. Bob Whiteside wrote: "Virginia" wrote in message news That's the lifetime cost to the average family per child till 18. You are correct with one caveate. These are the estimated lifetime expenditures on children for the lowest income group reported in the Expenditures on Children by Families annual report. The 2001 report shows the lowest income families earn less than $39,100 and their average income is $24,400. The 2001 lifetime cost for one child born to the lowest income families is estimated to be $169,920 for this income group. How can a family averaging $24,400 gross income per year before taxes afford to have even one child? Using the government's numbers, a child born in 2001 will cost $6,490 net for that year. Even assuming the average family pays no federal or state income taxes, they will net $22,533 after FICA/Medicare, which means one child will cost them 28.8% of their net income. Projected out at the same 3.4% inflation rate used for the child's expenses, that same fanily family will earn $43,076 in 2018. After FICA/Medicare only that family will have a net income of $39,780. The government says the same child will cost $13,210 in 2018 which means the family will spend 33.2% of their net income on the child. (Of course, the percentages of net spent to raise a child goes up if a family pays any income taxes.) And these calcualtions don't even factor in the average family has 1.6 children, which means the percentage of family net income needed to raise 1.6 children is well over 50% of net income, and even higher when income taxes are paid, or that .6 child is really factored in as 1 whole second child in a family. These numbers suggest either the government has over-inflated the cost of raising a child for political purposes, or families need to stop having children because they are way too expensive to raise. Bob Whiteside wrote: "Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message ... As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. TJ - You posted this 2 weeks ago and never attempted to refute the facts these numbers are for after tax spending. So once again, if the actual cost of raising a child is $168,840 after taxes, and the average tax payer family pays 28% Federal tax, 9% state tax, and 7.65% FICA/Medicare tax, the net income required to raise one child is $305,040. And since the average family has 1.6 children the net cost for the average family would be $488,064. How can any family afford to have children if these numbers are right? In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. You are mixing net and gross income/CS numbers as if they are the same thing. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Since mothers on welfare do not receive the CS paid to the state to reimburse welfare payments, and state pass-throughs were eliminated in the last Welfare Reform Act, a huge percentage of the difference between the $19 billion and $32.3 billion is not accounted for because the state receives the money instead of the CP's who are surveyed. This is a serious flaw that makes forming conclusions about how much CS is really received by mothers suspect. Look at the note on page 1 of the report. It very clearly notes that CS payments to TANF recipients are under reported. Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. You have made a serious error in what all the above means. The report you have cited is based on a survey of CP's asking them about how much was ordered and how much was RECEIVED. The assumption that means this report is definitive about how much was PAID is erroneous. The flaws in this logic are many. The NCP's weren't asked how much they paid, state welfare reimbursements are ignored, orders not yet in full affect are included, orders no longer in affect are included, CP's without formal court CS orders have had their reported amount estimated and included, and orders for adult children receiving college support are mixed in with the under 18 orders. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
"Virginia" wrote in message t... And of course they don't account for that which other family members provide etc of that amount. Both sets of our parents spend about 1/3 of what we do on the girls as well, so in essence we only pay 3/5-3/4 of the amount the gov't thinks we are solely responsible for spending. then there's Christmas Hanukkah etc, in which we spend less than our relatives by hitting sales and clearence racks all year and storring for holidays. Mostly I think that alot of money from tax credits, social services assistance etc doesn't get counted as income. we don't spend anywere near $6,500 a year apiece for our girls and we homeschool so I think it's all relative to the thriftiness and location of the parents. Oh yeah with the average person's credit card debt it is possible that people are spending more than they make. I didn't want to throw too many numbers into my prior post, but since you mentioned two children I'll relate the report's number of children and age methodology. The numbers are all based on two children. So for instance, a family with two children in the lowest income group would spend $6,490 for the youngest child under 2 and another $6,630 for a 3-5 year-old, or a total of $13,120. When there is only one child the number for the child's age group is multiplied by a factor of 1.24. So a 4 year-old only child would have an average of $6,630 times 1.24, or $8,221 spent on them. A factor of .77 is used for families with 3 or more children, and is applied against each age group expenditure estimate and then the expenditures per child are added together. This takes into account some shared expenditures, more hand-me-downs, etc. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
We so don't spend 13.120 on our girls each year. Not even close. And
they have museum and zoo memberships etc. Bob Whiteside wrote: "Virginia" wrote in message t... I didn't want to throw too many numbers into my prior post, but since you mentioned two children I'll relate the report's number of children and age methodology. The numbers are all based on two children. So for instance, a family with two children in the lowest income group would spend $6,490 for the youngest child under 2 and another $6,630 for a 3-5 year-old, or a total of $13,120. When there is only one child the number for the child's age group is multiplied by a factor of 1.24. So a 4 year-old only child would have an average of $6,630 times 1.24, or $8,221 spent on them. A factor of .77 is used for families with 3 or more children, and is applied against each age group expenditure estimate and then the expenditures per child are added together. This takes into account some shared expenditures, more hand-me-downs, etc. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Statistics
Is this that same ass we "ran off" last week? This ****'s getting
tiresome... Mel Gamble Fighting for kids wrote: As reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the cost of raising a child without daycare and educational costs included is $168,840, or $9,380 per year, or $781.67 per month, or $25.70 per day. In comparison the mean support order for a family (note: family not per child) was only $4,755, or 51% of the cost of ONE child. The ACTUAL mean amount of child support collected was only $2,791, or 60% of the cost of ONE child. The Actual Amount of Child Support Ordered: $32.3 Billion The Actual Amount of Child Support Received: $19 Billion Total amount of custodial parents with legal child support awards: 6,791,000 Received FULL payment: 3,066,000 or 45% Received Partial Payment: 1,939,000 or 29% Received NO payment: 1,786,000 or 26% Total of NCP's that paid something: 5,005,000 Of those who made payments, NCP's that paid the Full amount due made up 61%. NCP's who made partial payments made up 49% of those who paid in. NCP's that paid the FULL amount paid a total of $11.59 Billion, or 34% of the total amount due for 1999. NCP's that paid a PARTIAL amount paid in a total of 9.31 Billion, or 29% of the total amount due for 1999. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DCF FL found lying againg manipulating statistics.... | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | January 22nd 04 01:59 PM |
Canadian Statistics say... | PapaPolarBear | Child Support | 0 | October 26th 03 12:34 PM |
Lies, damned lies and statistics or GIGO | Fern5827 | Spanking | 3 | August 29th 03 03:36 PM |
Help! Need Statistics on Safety of Midwife Births | Shelly | Pregnancy | 12 | August 22nd 03 08:45 PM |
On divorce Statistics | Virginia | Child Support | 8 | July 5th 03 09:06 AM |