A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

39w1d decrease in fundal height



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 2nd 07, 07:01 PM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Susan M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height

I saw the doc yesterday and she said that I was 80% effaced and fingertip
dilated. I gather that its not exactly predictive of any certain time for
delivery except that I've had lots of cervical discomfort and strong cramps
on and off for the last two days. I'd say its getting closer anyway.

In any case, she gave me my records to carry around with me to the hospital
and, until this week, my fundal height had corresponded exactly with the
number of weeks pregnant that I am. At 38 weeks I was 38 cm but at the 39
week appointment it decreased to 37 cm. I haven't gained weight in three
weeks either. Do you think this just means that the baby has moved farther
down or should I be concerned about his growth or lack thereof at this time?
She didn't mention it to me so evidently she's not alarmed. It just seemed
strange.

Thanks,

Susan M


  #2  
Old February 2nd 07, 08:55 PM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Me Myself and I
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height

They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But
from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops down
into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be that
your baby has engaged between 38 week and now.

Take care.


--
Pip

My girls :
DD1 Jasmine - 5 weeks early - 21 March 02 -
Still as small as a peanut but as smart as a whip!

DD2 Abby - 8 weeks early - 3 Feb 05 -
I am very polite and say "Ank Ooooooo" whenever I'm given something.

"Yes you can drive me insane just by talking to me!"


--

"Susan M" wrote in message
...
I saw the doc yesterday and she said that I was 80% effaced and fingertip
dilated. I gather that its not exactly predictive of any certain time for
delivery except that I've had lots of cervical discomfort and strong cramps
on and off for the last two days. I'd say its getting closer anyway.

In any case, she gave me my records to carry around with me to the
hospital and, until this week, my fundal height had corresponded exactly
with the number of weeks pregnant that I am. At 38 weeks I was 38 cm but
at the 39 week appointment it decreased to 37 cm. I haven't gained weight
in three weeks either. Do you think this just means that the baby has
moved farther down or should I be concerned about his growth or lack
thereof at this time? She didn't mention it to me so evidently she's not
alarmed. It just seemed strange.

Thanks,

Susan M



  #3  
Old February 2nd 07, 10:19 PM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Anne Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,497
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height


In any case, she gave me my records to carry around with me to the
hospital
and, until this week, my fundal height had corresponded exactly with the
number of weeks pregnant that I am. At 38 weeks I was 38 cm but at the 39
week appointment it decreased to 37 cm. I haven't gained weight in three
weeks either. Do you think this just means that the baby has moved
farther down or should I be concerned about his growth or lack thereof at
this time? She didn't mention it to me so evidently she's not alarmed. It
just seemed strange.


absolutely classic, meaning the baby has dropped, growth also does slow down
towards the end, it is said babies put on half a pound a week in the last
few weeks, but I'm not sure that beyond 40 weeks there is much evidence for
that and lots of anecdotal that points in the opposite direction, even when
they are piling on half a pound a week, it's mostly fat and not length, so
it doesn't increase the fundal height in the same way that earlier growth
does.

Anne


  #4  
Old February 3rd 07, 02:39 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Susan M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height

"Me Myself and I" wrote in message
news:1170445878.567837@ftpsrv1...
They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But
from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops
down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be
that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now.


Thank you. I haven't been able to find anything on the Net about this but
it makes sense that the baby could have engaged further by now.

Susan M
Otis and Chester


  #5  
Old February 3rd 07, 02:40 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Susan M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height

"Anne Rogers" wrote in message
...
absolutely classic, meaning the baby has dropped, growth also does slow
down towards the end, it is said babies put on half a pound a week in the
last few weeks, but I'm not sure that beyond 40 weeks there is much
evidence for that and lots of anecdotal that points in the opposite
direction, even when they are piling on half a pound a week, it's mostly
fat and not length, so it doesn't increase the fundal height in the same
way that earlier growth does.


Thank you! That all makes perfect sense

Susan M


  #6  
Old February 6th 07, 03:37 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
rangitotogirl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height


"Me Myself and I" wrote in message
news:1170445878.567837@ftpsrv1...
They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But
from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops
down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be
that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now.


Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from
about 20 weeks onwards.


  #7  
Old February 6th 07, 04:21 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Me Myself and I
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height

Well my experience was limited to my LMC midwife (useless bitch she was so
she was probably lazy) and I was also under the care of a specialist at
Waikato Hospital. She was the one that told me that they NZ hospitals don't
do it as routine because there are so many variables to take into account,
weight gain, babies position etc.


--
Pip

My girls :
DD1 Jasmine - 5 weeks early - 21 March 02 -
Still as small as a peanut but as smart as a whip!

DD2 Abby - 8 weeks early - 3 Feb 05 -
I am very polite and say "Ank Ooooooo" whenever I'm given something.

"Yes you can drive me insane just by talking to me!"


--

"rangitotogirl" wrote in message
...

"Me Myself and I" wrote in message
news:1170445878.567837@ftpsrv1...
They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But
from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops
down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be
that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now.


Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from
about 20 weeks onwards.



  #8  
Old February 6th 07, 08:08 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Anne Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,497
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height


Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from
about 20 weeks onwards.


I've also corresponded with NZ midwives who use it regularly, I think that a
tape measure that actually has a slightly more realistic scale than 1cm per
week originated there, because that is actually not very accurate for many
women, so there is some desire for a better way of figuring out when there
is a real concern, rather than automatically worrying when it's a certain
number of cm behind. (Incidently, I've had an IUGR baby who measured spot on
until 32 weeks, then no increase, therefore wasn't at the worry point of 4cm
behind until 36+ weeks, but there being a problem was clear at 34 weeks,
whereas my non IUGR baby was consistently 4cm behind, emphasising that
changes from week to week are probably more important than the absolute
value).

Anne


  #9  
Old February 6th 07, 11:24 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Welches
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 849
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height


"Anne Rogers" wrote in message
...

Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ
from about 20 weeks onwards.


I've also corresponded with NZ midwives who use it regularly, I think that
a tape measure that actually has a slightly more realistic scale than 1cm
per week originated there, because that is actually not very accurate for
many women, so there is some desire for a better way of figuring out when
there is a real concern, rather than automatically worrying when it's a
certain number of cm behind. (Incidently, I've had an IUGR baby who
measured spot on until 32 weeks, then no increase, therefore wasn't at the
worry point of 4cm behind until 36+ weeks, but there being a problem was
clear at 34 weeks, whereas my non IUGR baby was consistently 4cm behind,
emphasising that changes from week to week are probably more important
than the absolute value).

My sister's place up in Yorkshire has charts according to your height which
gives you your expected fundal height. She was way over from early on (and
got bigger)-and had a small (9%) baby. My fundal height ended up about 8cm
too low, but she was about 50%.

Debbie


  #10  
Old February 6th 07, 05:44 PM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Susan M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default 39w1d decrease in fundal height

"Me Myself and I" wrote in message
news:1170731834.726678@ftpsrv1...
Well my experience was limited to my LMC midwife (useless bitch she was so
she was probably lazy) and I was also under the care of a specialist at
Waikato Hospital. She was the one that told me that they NZ hospitals
don't do it as routine because there are so many variables to take into
account, weight gain, babies position etc.


It is interesting to me for something that is supposed to be so variable
that I measured *exactly* the same centimeters as weeks from 14 weeks on
until now. It can't be useless in all cases!

Susan M
Otis and Chester


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Measuring fundal height - tape vs 'guessing' Cathy Pregnancy 5 September 11th 04 06:42 AM
Small fundal height (30cm) @ 35 weeks criss72 Pregnancy 5 April 24th 04 10:46 PM
Fundal height measurement question Jill Pregnancy 3 March 25th 04 03:52 AM
37 weeks Fundal height only 34cm na Pregnancy 5 November 2nd 03 04:38 AM
Fundal Height 31 at 33 weeks Kathy Pregnancy 8 August 4th 03 09:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.