If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah
in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 14, 11:19 pm, " wrote:
Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 4:26 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist
wrote: On Jul 14, 11:19 pm, " wrote: Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! He should have just chosen the "proud dead and beat dad" path and paid 0.0 in ex-wife err child support rather than be set in concrete in a 2x2metre cell for life without parole. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 12:57 am, "
wrote: On Jul 15, 4:26 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist wrote: On Jul 14, 11:19 pm, " wrote: Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! He should have just chosen the "proud dead and beat dad" path and paid 0.0 in ex-wife err child support rather than be set in concrete in a 2x2metre cell for life without parole. Or instead of turning himself in, he should have fled to a jurisdiction with no extradition agreement. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 1:19?am, " wrote:
Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. LOL..$200 a month is hardly being "nailed to a cross" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 4:32 am, Relayer wrote:
On Jul 15, 1:19?am, " wrote: Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. LOL..$200 a month is hardly being "nailed to a cross"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I guess we all dream of this stuff. But, they should just be dreams and fantasies. Obviously, this woman made the right decision getting away from this guy. Until now, hehehehe Do Woman Rule? http://mylesbian.blogspot.com/ Save 50% On Your Student Loans http://clc-micro.blogspot.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
I wonder how many years worth of child support that was. Is there a link to
this story? 18 years of support is ony 43000--and I know how bad interest and "penalties" can be. He must have felt really trapped to do such a thing! wrote in message oups.com... Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 2:32 am, Relayer wrote:
On Jul 15, 1:19?am, " wrote: Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. LOL..$200 a month is hardly being "nailed to a cross" Sooner you than me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 12:11?pm, Grizzlie Antagonist
wrote: On Jul 15, 2:32 am, Relayer wrote: Sooner you than me.- I paid almost 7 times that amount per week. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Jul 15, 9:43 am, "teachrmama" wrote:
I wonder how many years worth of child support that was. Is there a link to this story? 18 years of support is ony 43000--and I know how bad interest and "penalties" can be. The story said "two decades" of child support and yes, the interest is that bad...I know. Then add to it the mistakes the agency makes and it could even go higher. He must have felt really trapped to do such a thing! It's not only feeling trapped, but the assholes rip off your kids and then make you pick up the welfare tab and/or the new boyfriend's shelter costs. What amazes me is that more men don't do something like this. It shows how stoical and forgiving men really are. Smitty wrote in message oups.com... Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Per the CSE office of Texas, a parent ONLY has a duty to support children... | whatamess | Child Support | 0 | May 4th 07 08:38 PM |
VIRGINIA: State Senate kills bill to allow fathers to prepay child support obligations | [email protected] | Child Support | 0 | February 21st 06 03:17 AM |
US Office of Child Support Enforcement Statistics | Patrick Lee | Child Support | 2 | November 15th 05 02:30 AM |
Man who owed child support crashes truck through office doors | Don | Child Support | 33 | August 29th 04 05:46 AM |
OHIO Child-support office tried to hide $17,000 overpayment | Dave Briggman | Child Support | 18 | April 28th 04 11:34 PM |