If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maryland CS guidelines
The November 4 Washington Post contained a story about a proposed
increase in Maryland child support guidelines. The following is an e-mail that I sent to the reporter who wrote the story. "There's a great deal of misunderstanding about child support. Your story was clear and well-written, but in any future stories you write about child support, I hope you will keep in mind the following three points: "(1) Apparently, Maryland officials are talking about "the first increase in 20 years in recommended child support payments." However, the fact is that the state's existing CS guidelines (like those of most states) are tied to the incomes of parents. See http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/help.php. So if parental income rises, the child support amounts rise with it. If, on top of this, the numbers in the state guidelines are raised, non-custodial parents are being told that the state doesn't care about their ability to pay, which is linked to their income levels. "(2) Because of the continued glass ceiling on paternal custody, child support is nearly always money that fathers pay mothers. This one-way flow of funds has very significant political repercussions. In most states, fathers are effectively ignored when changes in child in child support are under consideration. It would be worth talking to fathers' representatives in Maryland in the context of any future stories on this subject. (Incidentally, if Maryland is like other states, there is no requirement that all, or even any, of the child support be spent on the children.) "(3) You may want to consider asking Maryland child support officials about the proportion of cases in which child support is being paid by mothers to custodial fathers. Many like to skate over this aspect by habitually talking about 'non-custodial parents' in this context. However, it is very likely that in Maryland only a handful of fathers are receiving child support -- because (a) only a small number of fathers have custody, and (b) many fathers consider themselves lucky to get custody of their children, and do not also seek child support from their exes." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Maryland CS guidelines
"Kenneth S." wrote in message ... The November 4 Washington Post contained a story about a proposed increase in Maryland child support guidelines. The following is an e-mail that I sent to the reporter who wrote the story. "There's a great deal of misunderstanding about child support. Your story was clear and well-written, but in any future stories you write about child support, I hope you will keep in mind the following three points: "(1) Apparently, Maryland officials are talking about "the first increase in 20 years in recommended child support payments." However, the fact is that the state's existing CS guidelines (like those of most states) are tied to the incomes of parents. See http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/help.php. So if parental income rises, the child support amounts rise with it. If, on top of this, the numbers in the state guidelines are raised, non-custodial parents are being told that the state doesn't care about their ability to pay, which is linked to their income levels. The CS guidelines are based on social science research detailing the expenditures for rearing children in intact families. If there are no reported increases in the costs of rearing children, and I have seen none, then increases in CS amounts are completely arbitrary without any justification. If anything, it would be my guess the current economic conditions are causing the expenditures on children to decrease, which would then cause the CS amounts to go down. The total lack of social science research into the costs of raising children by single parents is a disgrace. If the researchers were to examine single parent expenditures on children they would be forced to acknowledge the contributions made by both parents in their separate households. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maryland CS guidelines
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:27:04 -0800, "Bob W"
wrote: "Kenneth S." wrote in message .. . The November 4 Washington Post contained a story about a proposed increase in Maryland child support guidelines. The following is an e-mail that I sent to the reporter who wrote the story. "There's a great deal of misunderstanding about child support. Your story was clear and well-written, but in any future stories you write about child support, I hope you will keep in mind the following three points: "(1) Apparently, Maryland officials are talking about "the first increase in 20 years in recommended child support payments." However, the fact is that the state's existing CS guidelines (like those of most states) are tied to the incomes of parents. See http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/help.php. So if parental income rises, the child support amounts rise with it. If, on top of this, the numbers in the state guidelines are raised, non-custodial parents are being told that the state doesn't care about their ability to pay, which is linked to their income levels. The CS guidelines are based on social science research detailing the expenditures for rearing children in intact families. If there are no reported increases in the costs of rearing children, and I have seen none, then increases in CS amounts are completely arbitrary without any justification. If anything, it would be my guess the current economic conditions are causing the expenditures on children to decrease, which would then cause the CS amounts to go down. The total lack of social science research into the costs of raising children by single parents is a disgrace. If the researchers were to examine single parent expenditures on children they would be forced to acknowledge the contributions made by both parents in their separate households. I haven't been actively involved in this issue for some years. However, when I was, the "research" involved in setting state CS guidelines was utterly phony. So I agree with the point made above. Some years back, most states relied on the very shaky findings of Robert G. Williams, of Denver-based Policy Studies, Inc. He pandered to his audience (state CS bureaucrats who paid him big consulting fees), and plucked figures out of the air to justify increases in what fathers had to pay. For all I know, this may still be going on. For years, it was never even acknowledged that the costs of children to noncustodial parents were not taken into account when CS guidelines were being cooked up. This defect was most conspicuous when it came to the fixed costs, like the extra housing costs that fathers had to pay to provide accommodation for their children, even if the children were with them only every other weekend and for a period during the summer. I suspect the situation hasn't changed. It is many years since my younger child reached the age of majority, and I could at last get my ex-wife off my payroll. However, the grotesque anti-male discrimination in all aspects of CS still bothers me. Then there are the social costs of the present system. No one even bothers to consider whether, in the wider context, it is wise to provide mothers with major tax-free incentives to establish fatherless families by expelling their husbands. Surely we know enough about the social pathologies associated with fatherless families to stop subsidizing their creation. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Maryland CS guidelines
"Bob W" wrote in message ... "Kenneth S." wrote in message ... The November 4 Washington Post contained a story about a proposed increase in Maryland child support guidelines. The following is an e-mail that I sent to the reporter who wrote the story. "There's a great deal of misunderstanding about child support. Your story was clear and well-written, but in any future stories you write about child support, I hope you will keep in mind the following three points: "(1) Apparently, Maryland officials are talking about "the first increase in 20 years in recommended child support payments." However, the fact is that the state's existing CS guidelines (like those of most states) are tied to the incomes of parents. See http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/help.php. So if parental income rises, the child support amounts rise with it. If, on top of this, the numbers in the state guidelines are raised, non-custodial parents are being told that the state doesn't care about their ability to pay, which is linked to their income levels. The CS guidelines are based on social science research detailing the expenditures for rearing children in intact families. If there are no reported increases in the costs of rearing children, and I have seen none, then increases in CS amounts are completely arbitrary without any justification. If anything, it would be my guess the current economic conditions are causing the expenditures on children to decrease, which would then cause the CS amounts to go down. The total lack of social science research into the costs of raising children by single parents is a disgrace. If the researchers were to examine single parent expenditures on children they would be forced to acknowledge the contributions made by both parents in their separate households. Not to mention, governments are givng themselves raises all across the board. And they call this a "recession"? I get it; a recession for everyone else EXCEPT them! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Maryland CS guidelines
"Chris" wrote in message
... "Bob W" wrote in message ... "Kenneth S." wrote in message ... The November 4 Washington Post contained a story about a proposed increase in Maryland child support guidelines. The following is an e-mail that I sent to the reporter who wrote the story. "There's a great deal of misunderstanding about child support. Your story was clear and well-written, but in any future stories you write about child support, I hope you will keep in mind the following three points: "(1) Apparently, Maryland officials are talking about "the first increase in 20 years in recommended child support payments." However, the fact is that the state's existing CS guidelines (like those of most states) are tied to the incomes of parents. See http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/help.php. So if parental income rises, the child support amounts rise with it. If, on top of this, the numbers in the state guidelines are raised, non-custodial parents are being told that the state doesn't care about their ability to pay, which is linked to their income levels. The CS guidelines are based on social science research detailing the expenditures for rearing children in intact families. If there are no reported increases in the costs of rearing children, and I have seen none, then increases in CS amounts are completely arbitrary without any justification. If anything, it would be my guess the current economic conditions are causing the expenditures on children to decrease, which would then cause the CS amounts to go down. The total lack of social science research into the costs of raising children by single parents is a disgrace. If the researchers were to examine single parent expenditures on children they would be forced to acknowledge the contributions made by both parents in their separate households. Not to mention, governments are givng themselves raises all across the board. And they call this a "recession"? I get it; a recession for everyone else EXCEPT them! Oh come on, Chris, didn't you know that the (so-called) stimulus package counts as a pay raise for NCP's?!? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The vaccinate your kid or else approach in Maryland is it all aboutthe money? | bigvince | Kids Health | 15 | November 26th 07 03:40 AM |
Maryland State launches foster care reform.. | fx | Spanking | 0 | August 3rd 07 09:13 AM |
Maryland State launches foster care reform.. | fx | Foster Parents | 0 | August 3rd 07 09:13 AM |
Meeting for Homeschoolers in Western Maryland and surrounding areas | Pebs | General | 0 | September 26th 06 03:58 PM |
I Need Good Legal Counsel for the State of Maryland | Ronald Brown | Child Support | 2 | January 19th 05 12:49 AM |