If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kane Presumes for Doan
Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly
with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors, respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real respect from me. Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked. Kane, I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days. It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues. The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong. And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on fact, especially when it concerns my bias. I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally. Best, Doan ______________________ A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you. Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday. But it's looking like it's going to be awhile. You have so many choices you let slip by. Someday you'll figger it out. Kane |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Kane Presumes for Doan
Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe
start your own newsgroup with just the two of you? Thanks. P. Tierney "Kane" wrote in message m... Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors, respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real respect from me. Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked. Kane, I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days. It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues. The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong. And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on fact, especially when it concerns my bias. I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally. Best, Doan ______________________ A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you. Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday. But it's looking like it's going to be awhile. You have so many choices you let slip by. Someday you'll figger it out. Kane |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kane Presumes for Doan
P. Tierney wrote:
Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe start your own newsgroup with just the two of you? Thanks. P. Tierney Your keyboard to the deity of your choice's ears. What a bunch of clutter. Lesley |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Kane Presumes for Doan
My apology! My posts are in a.p.s only. Please add me to your kill filter. Doan On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, P. Tierney wrote: Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe start your own newsgroup with just the two of you? Thanks. P. Tierney "Kane" wrote in message m... Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors, respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real respect from me. Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked. Kane, I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days. It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues. The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong. And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on fact, especially when it concerns my bias. I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally. Best, Doan ______________________ A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you. Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday. But it's looking like it's going to be awhile. You have so many choices you let slip by. Someday you'll figger it out. Kane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Kane Presumes for Doan
"Doan" wrote in message ... My apology! My posts are in a.p.s only. Please add me to your kill filter. Thank you for clearing that up. It's nice to gete a polite reply now and then. P. Tierney On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, P. Tierney wrote: Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe start your own newsgroup with just the two of you? Thanks. P. Tierney "Kane" wrote in message m... Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors, respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real respect from me. Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked. Kane, I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days. It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues. The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong. And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on fact, especially when it concerns my bias. I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally. Best, Doan ______________________ A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you. Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday. But it's looking like it's going to be awhile. You have so many choices you let slip by. Someday you'll figger it out. Kane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Kane Presumes for Doan
:-)
Doan On 9 Dec 2003, Kane wrote: Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors, respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real respect from me. Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked. Kane, I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days. It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues. The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong. And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on fact, especially when it concerns my bias. I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally. Best, Doan ______________________ A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you. Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday. But it's looking like it's going to be awhile. You have so many choices you let slip by. Someday you'll figger it out. Kane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 03:30 AM |
| Doan? 2 was | And again he barks........ Kane barks ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | General | 1 | December 10th 03 01:07 AM |
| And again he barks........ Kane barks ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | General | 9 | December 9th 03 07:08 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 05:27 AM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | General | 2 | December 6th 03 04:28 AM |