A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Kane Presumes for Doan



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 03, 02:14 AM
Kane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kane Presumes for Doan

Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly
with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors,
respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real
respect from me.

Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked.

Kane,

I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days.

It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues.

The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the
obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong.

And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on
fact, especially when it concerns my bias.

I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable
argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally.

Best, Doan

______________________

A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you.

Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering
ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday.
But it's looking like it's going to be awhile.

You have so many choices you let slip by.

Someday you'll figger it out.

Kane
  #2  
Old December 10th 03, 03:46 AM
P. Tierney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kane Presumes for Doan

Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe
start your own newsgroup with just the two of you?
Thanks.


P. Tierney




"Kane" wrote in message
m...
Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly
with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors,
respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real
respect from me.

Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked.

Kane,

I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days.

It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues.

The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the
obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong.

And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on
fact, especially when it concerns my bias.

I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable
argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally.

Best, Doan

______________________

A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you.

Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering
ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday.
But it's looking like it's going to be awhile.

You have so many choices you let slip by.

Someday you'll figger it out.

Kane



  #3  
Old December 10th 03, 04:03 AM
LFortier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kane Presumes for Doan

P. Tierney wrote:
Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe
start your own newsgroup with just the two of you?
Thanks.


P. Tierney




Your keyboard to the deity of your choice's ears. What a
bunch of clutter.

Lesley

  #4  
Old December 10th 03, 05:45 AM
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kane Presumes for Doan


My apology! My posts are in a.p.s only. Please add me to
your kill filter.

Doan

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, P. Tierney wrote:

Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe
start your own newsgroup with just the two of you?
Thanks.


P. Tierney




"Kane" wrote in message
m...
Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly
with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors,
respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real
respect from me.

Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked.

Kane,

I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days.

It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues.

The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the
obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong.

And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on
fact, especially when it concerns my bias.

I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable
argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally.

Best, Doan

______________________

A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you.

Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering
ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday.
But it's looking like it's going to be awhile.

You have so many choices you let slip by.

Someday you'll figger it out.

Kane





  #5  
Old December 10th 03, 07:20 AM
P. Tierney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kane Presumes for Doan


"Doan" wrote in message
...

My apology! My posts are in a.p.s only. Please add me to
your kill filter.


Thank you for clearing that up. It's nice to gete a polite
reply now and then.


P. Tierney


On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, P. Tierney wrote:

Could you two take this off of misc.kids? Or maybe
start your own newsgroup with just the two of you?
Thanks.


P. Tierney




"Kane" wrote in message
m...
Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly
with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors,
respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real
respect from me.

Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked.

Kane,

I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days.

It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues.

The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the
obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong.

And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on
fact, especially when it concerns my bias.

I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable
argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally.

Best, Doan

______________________

A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you.

Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering
ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday.
But it's looking like it's going to be awhile.

You have so many choices you let slip by.

Someday you'll figger it out.

Kane







  #6  
Old December 10th 03, 07:39 AM
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kane Presumes for Doan

:-)

Doan


On 9 Dec 2003, Kane wrote:

Let me help you out. Instead of having to crawfish and doing it badly
with ad hom you could have bailed yourself out with flying colors,
respect of the readers, respect for yourself, and if it matters, real
respect from me.

Here's how an actual recovery post would have looked.

Kane,

I've taken a look at our exchange over the past 5 days.

It occurs to me that there is a better way to debate the issues.

The first thing I think I better consider is simply admitting the
obvious when it's shown to me, even if I'm wrong.

And when I make a claim I'm determind to see to it that it's based on
fact, especially when it concerns my bias.

I do not have to pretend to be "neutral" to mount a reasonable
argument. Or I could be objective, maybe, and show both sides equally.

Best, Doan

______________________

A post like that and I'da been all over myself supporting you.

Notice, other than the mild retort of "crawfish" no blazing blistering
ad homs. I really would like to debate you on facts and logic someday.
But it's looking like it's going to be awhile.

You have so many choices you let slip by.

Someday you'll figger it out.

Kane


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
| | Kids should work... Kane General 13 December 10th 03 03:30 AM
| Doan? 2 was | And again he barks........ Kane barks ...... again! was Kids should work... Kane General 1 December 10th 03 01:07 AM
| And again he barks........ Kane barks ...... again! was Kids should work... Kane General 9 December 9th 03 07:08 AM
Kids should work. LaVonne Carlson General 22 December 7th 03 05:27 AM
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... Kane General 2 December 6th 03 04:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.