If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A few of the Lisa Watkins posts
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:17:05 -0800 (PST), firemonkey
wrote: On Jan 15, 4:12 pm, Greegor wrote: Dan? Iowa: CPS Social Worker Charged With Perjury during TPR Hearing The WCF Courier reported: Those were from Greg. He was just hiding behind Lisa's skirt. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:49:51 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: You ****ants can't even keep an ongoing news story on track? What's to keep on track? You posted a plagiarized article stating the charges have been dropped without prejudice. What more needs to be mentioned at this point? -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:26:11 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: G You ****ants can't even keep an ongoing news story on track? KW What's to keep on track? *You posted KW a plagiarized article stating the charges KW have been dropped without prejudice. KW *What more needs to be mentioned at this point? Plagiarized? Are you going to claim YOU wrote it? -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:18:46 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: I had some interesting telephone conversations with the prosecutor, John Bernau. Any of them related to the case? Since he can't talk about the case in any detail without violating his ethics, something I don't see a county attorney doing, you most probably talked about something else. Or he gave very general information. Without going into more details I would way that it honestly sounds like prosecutor John Bernau is NOT going to be pressured into letting this one go. Incredibly, I honestly expect to see this one refiled in a few months. Based on the articles you posted, this would be a logical presumption. The County Attorney's office dropped the charges without prejudice. This allows them more time to gather evidence and re-file. It's done when the CA feels the evidence isn't enough to prove guilt BARD and the speedy trial deadline is looming. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:14:54 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: G I had some interesting telephone conversations with G the prosecutor, John Bernau. * * * * Any of them related to the case? Since he can't talk about the case in any detail without violating his ethics, something I don't see a county attorney doing, you most probably talked about something else. *Or he gave very general information. Without going into more details I would way that it honestly sounds like prosecutor John Bernau is NOT going to be pressured into letting this one go. Incredibly, I honestly expect to see this one refiled in a few months. * * * * Based on the articles you posted, this would be a logical presumption. *The County Attorney's office dropped the charges without prejudice. *This allows them more time to gather evidence and re-file. * * * * It's done when the CA feels the evidence isn't enough to prove guilt BARD and the speedy trial deadline is looming. There is no lack of evidence, sometimes it goes the other way. According to the articles, several of the subpoenas went unanswered. This means a lack of evidence is available for trial. I expect the CA's office will follow up, and re-file if the subpoenas produce enough evidence. Did you notice that her attorney is NOT from the state Attorney General's office? DUH. Someone from the AG's office isn't likely going to be a defense attorney. The Attorney General's office PROSECUTES. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:14:17 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: KW Someone from the AG's office isn't KW likely going to be a defense attorney. KW *The Attorney General's office PROSECUTES. Would you like to word that better Kent? Are you of the opinion that one of the AG's lawyers would act as the accused's defense counsel? Not even you can be this stupid. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
"Kent Wills" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:14:17 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: KW Someone from the AG's office isn't KW likely going to be a defense attorney. KW The Attorney General's office PROSECUTES. Would you like to word that better Kent? Are you of the opinion that one of the AG's lawyers would act as the accused's defense counsel? Not even you can be this stupid. That's almost as stupid as my ex claiming that I provided the 'D.A. who handled' his divorce case with an affidavit of relevant facts. LOL Like everyone is stupid enough to believe that a DA does divorce cases. Sure...the state office is going to provide an attorney to defend the state employee that they are prosecuting. LOL They might have to give a public defender, but that's a whole different ball game. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:44:39 GMT, "dragonsgirl"
wrote: KW Someone from the AG's office isn't KW likely going to be a defense attorney. KW The Attorney General's office PROSECUTES. Would you like to word that better Kent? Are you of the opinion that one of the AG's lawyers would act as the accused's defense counsel? Not even you can be this stupid. That's almost as stupid as my ex claiming that I provided the 'D.A. who handled' his divorce case with an affidavit of relevant facts. LOL Like everyone is stupid enough to believe that a DA does divorce cases. I suppose someone from the DA's office could do it. However, the person would most certainly be acting as the person's divorce attorney and NOT a representative of the DA's office. Sure...the state office is going to provide an attorney to defend the state employee that they are prosecuting. LOL They might have to give a public defender, but that's a whole different ball game. If she is indigent, she MUST be assigned an attorney from the Public Defender's office unless she waives right to counsel. She would NOT be assigned one from the AG's office, since that's a separate entity. None of this alters the fact that the AG's office acts as a prosecutor and not a defense attorney. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:04:30 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: On Jan 20, 11:44*am, "dragonsgirl" wrote: "Kent Wills" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:14:17 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: KW Someone from the AG's office isn't KW likely going to be a defense attorney. KW The Attorney General's office PROSECUTES. Would you like to word that better Kent? Are you of the opinion that one of the AG's lawyers would act as the accused's defense counsel? *Not even you can be this stupid. That's almost as stupid as my ex claiming that I provided the 'D.A. who handled' his divorce case with an affidavit of relevant facts. LOL Like everyone is stupid enough to believe that a DA does divorce cases. Sure...the state office is going to provide an attorney to defend the state employee that they are prosecuting. LOL They might have to give a public defender, but that's a whole different ball game. Can you think of a reason WHY the AG's office might actually defend CPS caseworkers in court? None. Maybe you could enlighten me, and anyone else who is unable to make up a reason. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why Caseworker Perjury charges were dropped - Subpoena's not answered?
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:31:06 -0800 (PST), Greegor
wrote: On Jan 20, 12:20*pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Jan 20, 1:04 pm, Greegor wrote: On Jan 20, 11:44 am, "dragonsgirl" wrote: "Kent Wills" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:14:17 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: KW Someone from the AG's office isn't KW likely going to be a defense attorney. KW The Attorney General's office PROSECUTES. Would you like to word that better Kent? Are you of the opinion that one of the AG's lawyers would act as the accused's defense counsel? *Not even you can be this stupid. That's almost as stupid as my ex claiming that I provided the 'D.A. who handled' his divorce case with an affidavit of relevant facts. LOL Like everyone is stupid enough to believe that a DA does divorce cases. Sure...the state office is going to provide an attorney to defend the state employee that they are prosecuting. LOL They might have to give a public defender, but that's a whole different ball game. Can you think of a reason WHY the AG's office might actually defend CPS caseworkers in court? DS Do you have any credible evidence that the DS AG's office does defend CPS CWs in court? Sure Dan, but please stick your neck out first! Make a BIG STATEMENT that the AG's office does not, just to make it more fun for me to prove that they DO. Dan's never made such a claim. Your usual game where you ask for proof but later say you didn't disagree, just asked for the proof, won't work so well any more. So you can't offer any. If you were able, you would have done so. Commit to a real challenge, Dan! You just proved you can't offer any proof. Stake your reputation on it! Oh. Never mind. It's a shame your reputation as a pathological liar is so well known. Dan, OTOH, has yet to be caught in a lie that I've seen. And mistakes do not equal a lie, though I anticipate you trying to claim they do. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lisa Welchel promoting child abuse | LaTreen Washington | General | 2 | July 17th 06 10:06 PM |
Lisa Welchel promoting child abuse | Geek the Girl | General | 3 | July 17th 06 04:34 AM |
"A Dragon By The Tail" by Lisa Reagan | john | Kids Health | 5 | August 3rd 05 11:36 PM |
FAO Lisa: day/night confusion | Dagny | Breastfeeding | 2 | January 1st 04 04:46 PM |
Review: Mona Lisa Smile (**) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | December 14th 03 03:33 AM |