A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Conversation with Dr. Embry re Spanking and Street Entry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 18th 06, 08:16 PM posted to alt.parenting.spanking
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,380
Default More lies from Kane Conversation with Dr. Embry re Spanking andStreet Entry


On 16 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

It goes the heart of the
accusation that Kane made about me regarding this study, that I was lying
when I said this study was not about spanking and street entries. Again,
if there is data to support the claim that spanking increase street
entries, I would like to see it.


You were lying not because of your claim about the study, but by your
claiming that I said the study was about spanking.

I never claimed this study was about spanking. I claimed it was about
alternatives to spanking.

This is typical "quibbling over details," just as you have always done.

Exhibition A:

Dec 11, 2006 Kane wrote:

"Nathan, an aside, since Doan has gone to lying to you, by lying about me.
His claim is that the Embry study is not about spanking.
This has gone on for years between us.
Try reading the truth:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...sg/274284f9c23...
This post clarifies exactly what is in the Embry report on this issue of
spanking.
Embry did indeed refer to it and code for it in the instructions to his
observers.
Doan is a stone liar of some considerable skill. "

In less than a week, you have turned 180 degree and say the complete
opposite. The proof is right there, Kane. You are pathological liar!
Now, if Nathan wants to waste his time with you, he can go ahead. I will
continue to expose your lies so that newcomers like Nathan will see you
for what you are, Kane - a STUPID LIAR!

Doan





  #32  
Old December 18th 06, 09:25 PM posted to alt.parenting.spanking
0:->
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,968
Default More lies from Doan Conversation with Dr. Embry re Spankingand Street Entry

Doan wrote:
On 16 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

It goes the heart of the
accusation that Kane made about me regarding this study, that I was lying
when I said this study was not about spanking and street entries. Again,
if there is data to support the claim that spanking increase street
entries, I would like to see it.

You were lying not because of your claim about the study, but by your
claiming that I said the study was about spanking.

I never claimed this study was about spanking. I claimed it was about
alternatives to spanking.

This is typical "quibbling over details," just as you have always done.

Exhibition A:

Dec 11, 2006 Kane wrote:

"Nathan, an aside, since Doan has gone to lying to you, by lying about me.
His claim is that the Embry study is not about spanking.
This has gone on for years between us.
Try reading the truth:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...sg/274284f9c23...
This post clarifies exactly what is in the Embry report on this issue of
spanking.
Embry did indeed refer to it and code for it in the instructions to his
observers.
Doan is a stone liar of some considerable skill. "

In less than a week, you have turned 180 degree and say the complete
opposite.





The proof is right there, Kane. You are pathological liar!
Now, if Nathan wants to waste his time with you, he can go ahead. I will
continue to expose your lies so that newcomers like Nathan will see you
for what you are, Kane - a STUPID LIAR!


Doan, we have agreed the study is not, even as Dr. Embry says, is
"about" spanking.

In fact YOU noted if I remember correctly, "physical punishment" did not
show up on a chart anywhere.

I pointed out that indeed it was coded for, and I included a quote from
the instructions to the observers defining physical punishment that
included "hitting."

Would you call hitting corporal punishment or not?

From my remarks at the opening of this post, in attributions:

"I never claimed this study was about spanking. I claimed it was about
alternatives to spanking.

You have once again split hairs, changed meanings, even changed context
to lie, Doan. Why do you do that? "

You wish to create a situation where exploring a subject and bring up
new issues amounts to a lie. That, sir, is in itself, lying.

Do you really think that Nathan and others are stupid and buy your bs?

Hell, you are even pulling the same bull**** on him with your personal
agenda framed questions.

Doan


Grow up, child.

Kane
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
| | Kids should work... Kane General 13 December 10th 03 03:30 AM
| | Kids should work... Kane Spanking 12 December 10th 03 03:30 AM
| | Kids should work... Kane Foster Parents 3 December 9th 03 12:53 AM
Kids should work. LaVonne Carlson General 22 December 7th 03 05:27 AM
Kids should work. ChrisScaife Foster Parents 16 December 7th 03 05:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.