No more problems

jerry wrote:
I really don't understand why Judith's post has caused such a fuss.

She just raised two facts about foreskins that you can't really argue
about.


Uhuh.....but she hasn't raised a single one which
would mandate compulsory mass circumcision of all
newborns.


The first was that they smell. This is true.

And, um, scrotums, vaginas, assholes, armpits,
mouths, feet, etc. could *never* stink, right?

Here's an idea: Let's chop off everything which
might smell bad if it's not washed properly!!!

On the other hand we could invent a special spray
for it - just like the special sprays we've invented
for the other stinky parts of the human anatomy.


The second fact was that foreskins spread diseases
like AIDS.

My foreskin isn't spreading AIDS, and neither are
most other foreskins in the world.


Circumcision may/may not have benefits/disadvantages,
but there's *NOTHING* that can't be delayed until
adulthood - when the *OWNER* of said foreskin can
make the decision to chop or not.

How hard is that for you to understand...? Which
part of the word "wait" are you having trouble with?




--
"I think he was taking ****s in the bathtub and covering it
with newspapers, like some kind of foul lasagna."

fungus wrote:


My foreskin isn't spreading AIDS, and neither are
most other foreskins in the world.



There is no question that your foreskin is a source of acute nervous
tension. Your sad and pathetic knee jerk responses confirm this. Take a
hike stinky.

wrote:

As long as those foreskin folds exist, so shall smegma and every other
foreskin-related ill. Fungus, why not simply admit that you have become
so accustomed to wallowing in your own stink, you simply do not know
any better!?ehe If a useless flap of skin grew over your decrepit TUSH,
would you revel in the bacteria that in traps, or would you run to the
doctor to have it removed!? No-brainer, right!?

If there was a word of truth in any of this drivel, it certainly looks
like Uncle Charlie Darwin would have taken a hand in it and only the
males without a foreskin would survive. Seems like there must be a lot
of women out there somewhere that like foreskins if they keep on and on
producing offspring with those nasty things.

My lady friend seems to really enjoy attacking my choad when it is nice
and soft and working her tongue between the foreskin and glands.

wrote:

In the US (most powerful & influential country in the world), over 80%
of the adult American male population is circumcised.

The rest of the civilized world doesn't seem
to be following you down the road to genital
mutilation.

Maybe you're not so "influential" as you think
you are.


Routine Infant Circumcisions per year. The #1 adult male performer of
all-time happens to be a circumcised Jew - Ron "The Hedgehog" Jeremy

Ah, the Jewish angle again...

Tens of millions of circumcised men are happily SHTUPPING away!

And hundreds of millions of uncircumcised men (remember,
the USA is only 10% of the world).

Remember, extra skin = queasy gals = less boots a knockin'! ehe If a
man wants to increase his chances of nabbing high-class trim, he will
shed that useless scab of skin!

Tell you what... I'll swap you all that for the
ability to whip it out anytime, anyplace, anywhere
and have a good wank the way nature intended.

On the bus, in the cinema, anywhere...no special
lube or other equipment needed. More tuggin' means
greater fertility and far less chance of prostate
cancer. A win-win-win situation, don't you think.


--
"I think he was taking ****s in the bathtub and covering it
with newspapers, like some kind of foul lasagna."

Briar Rabbit wrote:

There is no question that your foreskin is a source of acute nervous
tension. Your sad and pathetic knee jerk responses confirm this. Take a
hike stinky.

Now the frantic Mutilation Freaks are claiming foreskins are a source of
acute nervous tension, what and see what other Desperate claims they
will make...

Briar Rabbit wrote:
fungus wrote:


My foreskin isn't spreading AIDS, and neither are
most other foreskins in the world.

There is no question that your foreskin is a source of acute nervous
tension. Your sad and pathetic knee jerk responses confirm this. Take a
hike stinky.

Foreskin fetishism is one of the most dangerous and maniacal obsessions
of its kind, and fungus has it in spades!ehehee He would rather risk
AIDS than part with his beloved aardvark snout. That thing must feed on
circus peanuts! LOL! If any group is guilty of propaganda, it is the
anti-circ ilk! They specialize in outright lies (ie. foreskin has
health benefits, circumcision is mutilation and sexual torture,
circumcised men are physically & emotionally damaged, etc.),
distortions (most of the world is uncircumcised - inferring that
outside of the US, you will find a 0% circumcision rate! DOH) &
exaggerations (circumcision for an infant is excruciatingly painful).
-D, NYC "Christianity has deluged the world with blood & tears -
Judaism has caused neither for religion's sake" - MARK TWAIN..."The
first American scientist ever awarded the Nobel prize was Jewish" -
ALBERT ABRAHAM MICHAELSON".."In New York, even if you're Catholic,
you're Jewish. If you live in Butte, Montana, you're going to be
Goyish, even if you're Jewish!" ehe - LENNY BRUCE (b. Leonard Alfred
Schneider, umpteenth sweet, Jewish NYer).."The extraordinary European
Jews who emigrated to New York were enriching the city's intellectual
life with an intensity that has probably never been equaled anywhere
during a comparable period of time. I was raised largely by these
Jews... They were my teachers; they were my employers; they were my
friends. They introduced me to a world of books and ideas that I didn't
know existed" - MARLON BRANDO (excerpt from "Songs My Mother Taught
Me").."The Jew is the emblem of eternity. He who neither slaughter nor
torture of thousands of years could destroy, he who neither fire, nor
sword, nor Inquisition was able to wipe off the face of the earth. He
who was the first to produce the Oracles of God. He who has been for so
long the Guardian of Prophecy and has transmitted it to the rest of the
world. Such a nation cannot be destroyed. The Jew is as everlasting as
Eternity itself" - LEO TOLSTOY

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:41:02 -0700, darrint68 wrote:

He would rather risk
AIDS than part with his beloved aardvark snout

Ha ha ha ha ... I just choked on my beverage.

Of course, Darwin was right. (Try to teach that to the Christian
Fundamentalists in the US!)

Wrong!!, what you said that only males without foreskins would survive.
Nature takes a long time to evolve corrections and adjustments. Why
would the foreskin have been obliged to disappear in your
assigned/imagined/perceived time frame? Maybe those with foreskins have
to die first for the evolutionary correction to happen -- a good
indication is that the carriers of HIV are living up to your
expectations of how males will be selected for survival.

The appendix no longer functions but it's still present in all humans.
But the foreskin has shown indications of what could be considered some
attempt at "disappearance" - boys born with no foreskin or very short
foreskin.

Maybe your lady friend and some other like your and other guys'
foreskin, but that's not why nature keeps producing them, as you know
it's contrary to evolution and a suggestion that the "theory of use and
disuse" could be correct, which it's not at all. And by the way, your
foreskin doesn't cover a glands, it covers a glans.

Personally, my girlfriend loves a nice clean circumcision behind the
glans she plays with on me.

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:11:44 -0700, wrote:

Maybe those with foreskins have
to die first for the evolutionary correction to happen

Any trait or feature having to do with sex, its pleasure, or its
reproductive consequences would much more quickly be dealt with
evolutionally (?) than other traits or features.

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:11:44 -0700, wrote:

Personally, my girlfriend loves a nice clean circumcision behind the
glans she plays with on me.

Oh, and she likes mine too. Give her a kiss for me - but not before she
brushes her teeth.