If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Question, again
A punishing predicament
Spanking still provokes debate among parents, psychologists Sunday, February 19, 2006 Mark Ellis THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH EVANGELIA PHILIPPIDIS | DISPATCH (S)torm warnings were in the air as a 13-year-old George Chatters approached his East Side home on his bike. ''People in the neighborhood were saying my dad was looking for me," recalled Chatters, 39. ''He was touring the city in his car." The youth had broken a family rule not to leave the area without permission. The enforcer: Dad's belt. ''I got it really good when I got home," he said. ''I was hardheaded." As a father of two, the Pickerington resident favors a less-physical approach to discipline, although he keeps spanking in his toolbox as a last resort. Many other Americans do, too. Despite a move away from spanking in recent decades, a majority of U.S. parents still approve of - and sometimes rely on - corporal punishment. In 1968, according to the Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire, 94 percent of parents deemed spanking sometimes necessary - a figure that dropped to 61 percent by 2004, according to a national survey commissioned by the Center for Child and Family Studies in San Francisco. The topic - particularly the question of when physical punishment becomes abuse - lay at the heart of a Hamilton County Municipal Court case in Cincinnati that involved former City Councilman Sam Malone. He was found not guilty of domestic violence on Friday. He had been accused of beating his 14-year-old son with a belt for disrespecting a teacher. The teenager suffered welts on his arms, legs, chest and buttocks. Monitored by discipline experts, the case has refueled debate about physical punishment that causes pain but not injury to a child. Psychologists are divided over any ban on the physical punishment of children, but even those who see no harm in occasional spanking view it as potentially damaging when used severely or as the main method of discipline. In a survey, most pediatricians said they advise against physical punishment. The American Psychological Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have asked educators to stop spanking students, but the groups haven't told parents never to spank their children. Physical punishment is outlawed in 14 nations and limited in Canada to those older than 3 and younger than 13. Twenty-eight states ban such punishment in schools. Ohio leaves the decision to individual districts; about 25 of 613 permit the practice. Chatters, an author and enrollment adviser at Columbus State Community College, has 11- and 3-year-old daughters with wife Adrienne. He counts on spanking as the "last layer of discipline - when there's no other means to rectify the problem." "It's really not necessary to always physically punish," he said. "It can be a stern look or commenting . . . that I'm very disappointed, and then here come the tears." His next step might be to take away TV, computer or telephone time. Cari Brackett, an associate professor of pharmacy and family medicine at Ohio State University, remembers slapping her son at age 2 while changing a diaper. He had kicked her in the face. "I was hit a lot as a child," said the Grandview Heights mother, 48. "It was a reaction on my part. We both cried." In the 12 years since, the boy hasn't been struck in discipline. The approach that Brackett - along with her husband, David Anderson - considers most effective is based on discussing problems and modeling behavior. "A child is a reflection of who you are and what you have taught him," she said. "If you deal with a child as a wellintentioned, willing-to-learn, willing-to-please little person, and if you don't put them in a position where they can get themselves into trouble, they will do as you ask because they love you." A child who is struck, Brackett said, learns that hitting is acceptable. "We're admitting we don't know what else to do." Keeping youngsters busy and redirecting their behavior before trouble starts represent the best strategies, Dublin psychologist Robert Fathman said. A spoken reprimand usually suffices - followed by a task or chore "that benefits the injured party." The 60-year-old father of four grown children was fond of making them clean his car as punishment. Fathman serves as president of the nonprofit Center for Effective Discipline in Columbus - which opposes physical punishment. "Almost all child abuse starts with hitting or shaking," he said. As experts acknowledge, however, mild physical punishment is at least immediately effective. Spanking works in the short term, research indicates, but no better than other methods, said Murray Straus, co-director of the Family Research Laboratory. "The parent says: 'That's wrong. You've hurt your brother.' Almost always, the child stops," he said. "Just like if you slap a child's hand, they almost always stop. "Whatever you do, it takes many repetitions," he said, because toddlers lack control of their behavior. "In the longer run, spanking is less effective because it builds up an immunity. And, bit by bit, it chips away at the bond between child and parent." As studies show, Straus said, children subjected to frequent physical punishment suffer depression as adults. Those who say they are unharmed by childhood beatings, he said, are "the lucky ones." Strict-parenting advocate John Rosemond - a psychologist, columnist and public speaker from Gastonia, N.C. - challenges such conclusions. He doesn't advocate spanking but calls it not necessarily harmful. "Sometimes, with children, you have to do something dramatic in order to create a memory," he said. Corporal punishment is most effective with ages 2 to 6, he said, and might be appropriate - but rarely - through 10. "If you find yourself spanking a lot or . . . on some regular basis with a child older than 6, the message is quite clear: Spanking is not working." It should never be impulsive, even in the face of "belligerent defiance," Rosemond said. "Cool yourself down." The hand is the best tool for the job, he said: An adult whose hand begins to sting while spanking should stop. A biblical reference (Proverbs 13:24) about the use of a rod for discipline is metaphorical, Rosemond and Fathman said. They cited it as the cause of too much spanking with an object by parents who interpret the Bible literally. "The rod was the guiding staff of shepherds," Fathman said. "The rod was a tool for guidance, not inflicting pain." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If you want to discuss something I feel is relevant | beccafromlalaland | Spanking | 128 | February 16th 06 09:52 PM |
Question #2 for Dr. Sarah Vaughan (should women have to ASK?) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 9 | November 7th 04 11:03 PM |
Doan lies yet again..was.. Kane0 lies again Doan's phony offer to "debate" | Kane | Spanking | 6 | May 14th 04 02:10 AM |
Classic Droan was R R R R, should I DOUBLE DARE HIM? ..was... LaVonne | Kane | Spanking | 0 | April 17th 04 07:13 PM |
Kids should work... | bobb | General | 108 | December 15th 03 03:23 PM |