If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
To "Opinions"
Of course I recognize "Observer." I just thought I'd allow "Opinions" a
chance to continue to reveal himself (grin)! LaVonne wrote: Come on, you don't recognize "Observer" with a sock over his head? He never could respond intelligently, or ethically. 0:- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
To "Opinions"
Opinions wrote: Carlson LaVonne wrote: You appear not to respond to hard questions or want an honest debate. I have responded to many of your posts and you have responded with silence. Could it be you have no logical response? LaVonne Absent any reference on my part to the topic, telling me what I do and do not understand is not debate; it's an accusation. I don't think so (grin)! I think you have nothing to debate so you avoid my responses to you. Given the preceding statement, why should I want to debate you? What do you think you have that I could benefit from having? Who are you that I should care what you think, say, or do? I have no idea why you should want to debate with me, or anyone else. However, since you posted on this ng, it appeared you wanted to discuss and debate. Otherwise, why are you posting? Define logic as you understand it. How many varieties of logic are there? I'll give you an answer of illogical thinking. Above you state "Who are you that I should care what you think, say, or do?" This isn't about who I am or who you are or about caring what either thinks. This isn't a coffee party. This is a ng, and there is very little logical reason to post if one doesn't want to discuss issues and debate intelligently. Of course, illogical thinking could lead one to post for no reason whatsoever, other than personal harassment. LaVonne |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
To "Opinions"
Carlson LaVonne wrote:
Opinions wrote: Carlson LaVonne wrote: You appear not to respond to hard questions or want an honest debate. I have responded to many of your posts and you have responded with silence. Could it be you have no logical response? LaVonne Absent any reference on my part to the topic, telling me what I do and do not understand is not debate; it's an accusation. I don't think so (grin)! I think you have nothing to debate so you avoid my responses to you. Given the preceding statement, why should I want to debate you? What do you think you have that I could benefit from having? Who are you that I should care what you think, say, or do? I have no idea why you should want to debate with me, or anyone else. Excellent point. By your own omission, in totally ignoring my preceding paragraph, you have nothing to offer. However, since you posted on this ng, it appeared you wanted to discuss and debate. Otherwise, why are you posting? ng = NEWS group. News, get it? The 1st definition of news is "a: a report of recent events b: previously unknown information c: something having a specified influence or effect" Apparently the lexicologist missed including the "d: debate the closed-minded ideologues" definition. Anyone have a dictionary with that one in it? The *news* is that no-spanks are a subculture. No-spanks engage in what amounts to little more than eugenics by proxy. The potential *effect* is that if no-spanks ever get real power, the results will rival the current disaster in Washington. Define logic as you understand it. How many varieties of logic are there? I'll give you an answer of illogical thinking. Above you state "Who are you that I should care what you think, say, or do?" This isn't about who I am or who you are or about caring what either thinks. This isn't a coffee party. Giving what you consider to be an illogical example is not defining logic. This is a ng, and there is very little logical reason to post if one doesn't want to discuss issues and debate intelligently. Of course, illogical thinking could lead one to post for no reason whatsoever, other than personal harassment. How am I harassing you? By being here? If so, you are paranoid. Seek psychiatric help as soon as possible. After all, you are the one who first sought to engage me. All I did was try to avoid confrontation. Hence, especially given that you admit that you have nothing to offer that is worthwhle, you are the harasser. LaVonne |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
To "Opinions"
LIE, "never-spanked" boy, LIE. ;-) Doan On 4 Nov 2005 wrote: Dance, monkeyboy, dance. R R R R R R 0:- |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
To "Opinions"
Opinions wrote: Carlson LaVonne wrote: Opinions wrote: Carlson LaVonne wrote: You appear not to respond to hard questions or want an honest debate. I have responded to many of your posts and you have responded with silence. Could it be you have no logical response? LaVonne Absent any reference on my part to the topic, telling me what I do and do not understand is not debate; it's an accusation. I don't think so (grin)! I think you have nothing to debate so you avoid my responses to you. Given the preceding statement, why should I want to debate you? What do you think you have that I could benefit from having? Who are you that I should care what you think, say, or do? I have no idea why you should want to debate with me, or anyone else. Excellent point. By your own omission, in totally ignoring my preceding paragraph, you have nothing to offer. Totally ignoring? You asked "..why should I want to debate you?" I answered that I had no idea. Nor do I have any idea why who I think I am is relevant to the discussion. In other words, you were answered, I did not totally ignore your paragraph and I admitted that I had nothing to offer. I assume you understand that I make no claims to being a mind reader. So, you are, among other things, a liar, or very dificient in language skills. However, since you posted on this ng, it appeared you wanted to discuss and debate. Otherwise, why are you posting? ng = NEWS group. News, get it? The 1st definition of news is "a: a report of recent events b: previously unknown information c: something having a specified influence or effect" You might have missed, " .. since you posted on THIS ng." Please go back and reread and answer the question actually put to you. You've posted nothing "news" worthy to this ng. Apparently the lexicologist missed including the "d: debate the closed-minded ideologues" definition. Anyone have a dictionary with that one in it? I don't fit your description but you do invite me to ask, "debate?" When have you debated? Must have missed your post. The *news* is that no-spanks are a subculture. No, that's not news. That silliness has been tried here before. There are millions of us. Hardly a subculture. No-spanks engage in what amounts to little more than eugenics by proxy. The potential *effect* is that if no-spanks ever get real power, the results will rival the current disaster in Washington. We already have power. We don't spank ours, and we notice that our children fair better at all levels, intellectually, and socially, and most especially psychologically. They have a great deal of difficulty in deluding themselves, as you folks do. Define logic as you understand it. How many varieties of logic are there? I'll give you an answer of illogical thinking. Above you state "Who are you that I should care what you think, say, or do?" This isn't about who I am or who you are or about caring what either thinks. This isn't a coffee party. Giving what you consider to be an illogical example is not defining logic. Sorry, examples are common in definitions. You simply want more. I'm not here to discuss logic, so much as spanking, and your lack of logic. This is a ng, and there is very little logical reason to post if one doesn't want to discuss issues and debate intelligently. Of course, illogical thinking could lead one to post for no reason whatsoever, other than personal harassment. How am I harassing you? You aren't. You are trying. Poorly. By being here? Actually you are very welcome here. The more of you the better. And the more like you. It makes our argument so much more credible when we have examples of the spanked. If so, you are paranoid. Well, since you aren't harrassing me, and I want you here as long as possible posting as much as possible, that would hardly classify me as a paranoid. Seek psychiatric help as soon as possible. After all, you are the one who first sought to engage me. Let me give you yet another example of logic, by pointing out its opposite. You opened this little number with a question, "How am I harrassing you?" Followed up with the question, "By being here?" and finally with, "If so, you are paranoid." Then, you go on to tell me to seek psychiatric help. I presume because you have proven I'm a paranoid. Wouldn't that be a bit illogical to assume given you hadn't read my answer yet? Now if I said, yes, you are harassing me, and yes it's because you are here, then we could explore this supposed paranoia of mine. But I didn't. Hence you are illogical. All I did was try to avoid confrontation. When was that? Hence, especially given that you admit that you have nothing to offer that is worthwhle, you are the harasser. By answering your question? That I have no way of knowing why you are posting here? Yes, I think I can figure out between us who is most in need of psychiatric help. 0:- Or possible some training in ethics. Topped off with a short course in critical thinking skills. Would do you wonders. 0:- |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|