If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
cycle, but an early ovulation (day 12-16) that had a positive pregnancy test AFTER day 35? I would have expected to see a positive pregnancy test by day 30 at the latest if I was pregnant. Every day that AF hasn't arrived gives me hope that maybe I am actually pregnant and not just late. I have known women who didn't trigger pg tests until they were 3 months pregnant. For me, though, I tend to trigger them within about 48 hours of implantation. Late implantation can indicate a less "robust" pregnancy--loss rates for implantation 12 days after ovulation can be higher than 80%, vs. a loss rate of 13% for pgs which implant 8 days post ovulation (as measured by detectible HCG in the blood.) With the pg I miscarried, FRER did not show a positive test until 18 days post ovulation, and even that was ridiculously faint. Dollar tree tests had turned positive a couple days earlier. I only used dollar tree tests the next time and got a positive result (faint) at a whopping 8 days post ovulation. That "positive" is now napping in my bedroom... The testing roller coaster is Not Fun... but you're on the right track. Jenrose |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... In response to one of the earlier messages, I'm 31 and my husband is 39. I feel like we don't have the luxury of time while trying to conceive. If you were, say, 37 instead of 31, I'd agree with you. But at 32 I got pregnant twice in three months... Like most women, I thought I would have no problem getting pregnant, but that hasn't been the case. I think we'll keep trying the full year before we look into infertility options. Good plan. It's kind of hard too because since I have such a long cycle, I get 3 less opportunities a year to try (since my cycle is about a week longer than the average woman, I lose 3 months a year). I'm not giving up. We'd like to have 2 kids if time allows. Like it was mentioned earlier, I'm hopeful that eventually we will be successful because I know that we did conceive once and that's a good sign. And miscarriages are *extremely* common--and yes, it should be reassuring that yes, you could concieve. That means that your tubes are open enough for egg to meet sperm, that you have egg and he has sperm. I have not been charting temps. You learn a LOT about your cycle by charting. DH would pop the thermometer in my mouth when he got up, then write the number down. I charted on Fertility Friend, which made things crystal clear. I started out charting my CM, but my OB/GYN said that method wasn't as reliable as OPKs, mainly because it can be mistaken for fluids generated during intercourse. You might as well chart that... it, too, can be helpful to let you know what's going on. So, I've been doing only that method. I have been reading many posts about the Taking Charge Of Your Fertility book, so I think I will take that advice and get it today. I think I'll probably try charting my temps too. I don't think I ever did get a positive OPK with ovulation, though I did get positive OPK's when pg...lol! (the molecule the OPK test detects is closely related to hcg and hcg will trigger an OPK test while ovulation will NOT trigger a pregnancy test.) For me, temp was a much, much better indicator. And for timing sex, cm was vital. Jenrose |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 12:48:43 -0700, dayna.abell wrote:
Oh, and does having a long luteal phase complicate conception at all? I'm wondering if this has anything to do with why we haven't had much luck conceiving up to now. I have no experience myself with long luteal phases, rather the contrary. However, I was wondering if you have been monitoring your cycles from before starting to actively TTC (try to conceive). If not, you may have been experiencing more than one very early miscarriage, which lengthens your luteal phase by several days. These pregnancies terminate since the fertilized egg cannot properly implant for whatever reason, and so they often don't result in a positive HPT. The long luteal phases in itself would be a good cause to start looking for a good reproductive expert and discuss this. -- --I mommy to DS (July '02) mommy to four tiny angels (Oct '03 - Oct '04) guardian of DH (age classified) expecting twins (boy/girl) in August |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | May 30th 05 05:28 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 30th 05 05:24 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 29th 04 05:26 AM |
Query : Late Period | Kazh | Pregnancy | 20 | July 26th 04 04:31 PM |
Birth story: very late and *extremely* long | Sidheag McCormack | Pregnancy | 14 | December 13th 03 08:37 PM |