If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
"Zucca4" wrote in message ... How many people percentage wise would you say fail the one hour screening test but go on to pass the 3 hour fasting test? Just found out my blood sugar was 179, cutoff was 140, and that I have to take the three hour after my vacation next week. Do you think I should follow a strict diabetic diet whilst on holiday? Hi Lisa, I had this same question when I flunked the 1 hour. Babycenter says only about 15% of women who have to take the 3 hour test actually have GD (http://www.babycenter.com/refcap/pre...alth/1483.html). I found another reference that said 8% but can't find the link now; either way it's pretty low. I found info by googling: gestational diabetes glucose tolerance. Almost every source says about 2 - 5% of pregnant women develop GD so your odds are probably good. That said, I did eliminate sugar entirely (including honey and high-sugar fruits) and watch my white carbs very closely until I got the results. I have a mega sweet tooth and was concerned that if I did have GD I'd been forcing the baby to overproduce insulin without knowing it, so figured the sooner I got on track if I did have GD, the better for her. Also, did you fast before the 1 hour test? My docs said I didn't need to, and I didn't. I didn't have sugar that day but I did have bread and other carbs, so there would've been sugar from those. The phlebotomist who did the 3 hour with me said she suspects that one of the reasons so many people flunk the 1 hour test is because they aren't told to fast first. Jen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
"Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message If this is purely gestational diabetes and your glucose metabolism is normal when not pregnant, research doesn't show much effect from diet or insulin treatment, which suggests that it doesn't matter all that much what you eat now Ericka, font of all knowlege :-), can you tell me where you got this particular bit of info from? I'd love to have a look at it. My 3 hour GTT came back fine, but one of my OB's suggested that since I failed the1 hour I should still be careful with my carb/simple sugar intake. If diet truly doesn't have an impact on this *particular* issue if I process sugar normally when not pregnant, that may be something I want to know about when deciding whether to reach for that Oreo. Jen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
Zucca4 wrote:
How many people percentage wise would you say fail the one hour screening test but go on to pass the 3 hour fasting test? Just found out my blood sugar was 179, cutoff was 140, and that I have to take the three hour after my vacation next week. Do you think I should follow a strict diabetic diet whilst on holiday? I don't know the exact number who fail the one hour but pass the 3 hour, but the one hour *is* a screening test, which means that it usually identifies quite a few people as being at higher risk who actually don't have the problem. On the other hand, it's not like you just missed the cutoff, which would increase the risk that you'd fail the 3 hour. As far as whether you should immediately start following the diet, doing so probably won't affect the results of your 3 hour test (though your diet in the few days prior to the test can). So the question is whether you ought to start following the diet to benefit your baby. Research doesn't give a clear answer to this. If you are an undiagnosed true diabetic, then diet management is important. If this is purely gestational diabetes and your glucose metabolism is normal when not pregnant, research doesn't show much effect from diet or insulin treatment, which suggests that it doesn't matter all that much what you eat now (and begs the question of why all the testing anyway). But some people think it's important for the baby anyway, so it's your judgement call based on what you believe. Best wishes, Ericka |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
Jennifer Rasmussen wrote:
Also, did you fast before the 1 hour test? My docs said I didn't need to, and I didn't. I didn't have sugar that day but I did have bread and other carbs, so there would've been sugar from those. The phlebotomist who did the 3 hour with me said she suspects that one of the reasons so many people flunk the 1 hour test is because they aren't told to fast first. Jen This was my experience too, I think. I "failed" the 1-hour test that I took immediately after a breakfast of eggs, toast, and milk. My number was something like 155. My friend who is diabetic calculated that I probably had a pretty carb/sugar heavy meal going into the test and it may have been enough to squew the result. I look the 3-hour test Saturday AM and have not heard back. I've not had time yet this week to call the doctor's office myself, but since they were so prompt in calling with the 1-hour results, I figure they'd have called by now with the 3-hours results had they been anything to worry about. Good luck! Valerie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
Jennifer Rasmussen wrote:
"Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message If this is purely gestational diabetes and your glucose metabolism is normal when not pregnant, research doesn't show much effect from diet or insulin treatment, which suggests that it doesn't matter all that much what you eat now Ericka, font of all knowlege :-), can you tell me where you got this particular bit of info from? I'd love to have a look at it. My 3 hour GTT came back fine, but one of my OB's suggested that since I failed the1 hour I should still be careful with my carb/simple sugar intake. If diet truly doesn't have an impact on this *particular* issue if I process sugar normally when not pregnant, that may be something I want to know about when deciding whether to reach for that Oreo. It's mostly from looking at a bunch of studies, though Henci Goer has a good chapter in _Obstetric Myths vs. Research Realities_. Also, in Enkins et al.'s _Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth_ they say that treatment with diet has not been shown to be effective and treatment with insulin even less so (they actually state that in some areas of medicine, treating with insulin based on such flimsy evidence would be considered unethical). Here's one study that'll get you started, and then you can start clicking on "related studies" to find mo http://tinyurl.com/knmq Santini DL and Ales KL, 1990 They looked at 533 women who were not screened for GD and 774 women who were screened (with the assumption that those who were screened, and presumeably treated, would have lower rates of complications). They found that there were no significant differences in the percentages of babies over 4000g, babies over 4500g, or in large-for-gestational age babies as calculated by one of two methods. Using the other method for calculating LGA babies, the *screened* group had a significantly higher percentage of LGA babies. There were also no significant differences in perinatal mortality, perinatal mortality adjusted for nonviable infants, birth injuries, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hyperbilirubinemia, polycythemia, respiratory complications, or intracerebral hemorrhage. On the other hand, primary c-sections were higher in the screened group, as were more prenatal visits, more tests, and more prenatal hospitalizations. There are a few studies that show improved outcomes, but in most cases, if you dig a little further you find that they didn't control for maternal weight (which may well be more significant than GD status) or that the study was poorly designed or whatever. Best wishes, Ericka |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
"Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... a whole lot of useful stuff, including references to studies I had asked about THANK YOU ERICKA, once again, for so often taking the time to inform and enlighten like this. You're a woman who makes a difference. Jen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
3 hour glucose test stats?
I failed my 1 hour test and passed my 3 hr with flying colors! Turns out
that taking Terbutaline skews the results of the first one. So anyone out there that's taking it (I was on pre-term labor bed rest) should be aware of that... "Zucca4" wrote in message ... How many people percentage wise would you say fail the one hour screening test but go on to pass the 3 hour fasting test? Just found out my blood sugar was 179, cutoff was 140, and that I have to take the three hour after my vacation next week. Do you think I should follow a strict diabetic diet whilst on holiday? Thanks, Lisa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
for women | MISS PHD | General | 1 | October 7th 03 11:48 AM |
3 hr glucose test | Nina | Pregnancy | 7 | August 4th 03 04:45 PM |
Glucose test | Nina | Pregnancy | 1 | August 1st 03 08:44 PM |
3 hour glucose test question (long) | cfd-z | Pregnancy | 3 | July 19th 03 08:26 PM |
Glucose Test - Yum (!) | Laura Schaefer | Pregnancy | 5 | July 17th 03 06:40 PM |