Record 311,000 children torn from homes in 2005

Kane wrote
You seemed not the least concerned when Doug posted from such sources.

What better source of numbers to prove the corruption of
the agencies than to use the numbers THEY REPORT THEMSELVES?

This does not mean that Family Rights people actually BELIEVE
the numbers the agencies fabricate.

Why is that I wonder?
Now, can you answer the obvious question I asked?
The numbers were claimed to be up over a period of time.
Apparently to suggest an increase in CPS efforts to "collect children
for the child protection INDUSTRY," (isn't that how you say it?).
When in fact the country has a growing economically disadvantaged
population that has contributed to child abuse and neglect statistics,
I would guess.

Attach a number to your guess and call it official statistics Kane!
You can't do any worse than the Meth Connected numbers which
are based on guesses. (another thread)

The idea that the poor don't abuse and neglect their children more,
Greg, is a silly liberal bleeding heart piece of bull**** used to try
and further YOUR socialist agenda, and others that have proceeded you
here.

It must pain you when CPS caseworkers or CWLA spout that 'ism then!

We have a huge influx of very poor folks from the south. We have folks
coming out of Africa, a nation known in many parts for particularly
harsh child rearing practices, up to and including the excising of
little girl's clitorises and parts of the labia.

Look, there's Barney Fife, shining his ONE BULLET and telling
about that one time when some actual criminals came to town!
Keep harping on the 1% of substance and ignore the 80% with no
substance.
Good luck with that.

In fact, in the study that Ken was brought here to attack me for you,
the harshest child rearing practices were found in a part of Africa.
Our own indigenous population, prior to these recent immigrants
(meaning all of here prior), suffers in some classes, considerable
poverty.
That coupled with a rise of Christian fundamentalism where child
rearing with pain and humiliation are common in some sects, and YOU
AND FERN AND OTHERS HAVE WISHED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF to do those
things, we have every reason to expect the number of children removed
to increase in total.
I note the rate was not noted though. Did you notice?

Are you going to accuse people of HATING BUREAUCRACY again, Kane?

In fact, Greg, we have read recently, that many states have FEWER
children by rate in our of home care than in earlier years.

You boys certainly are prone to cherry picking.

It's the season. You might find work in the orchards. Come West, I'll
be happy to put you up, while I continue to work on your poor
education.

Tell your mother she should be ashamed raising an ignorant kid like
you with the low morals you have. Whatever distracted her from raising
you properly?