If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Letter to Editor USA Today
Jan Drew wrote:
You claim to be a pediatrician, kidsdoc and you don't know whaere this study came from? Use the exact words-- Stimulant treatment in high school also did not influence drug use in adulthood except for greater use of cocaine. http://www.google.com/ You can easily find it. If you cannot-- YOU are the loser. Sure it was easy to find. It was also easy to see that Jan Drew dishonestly snipped and took a single sentence out of context, failing to include the actual conclusion of the paper: "Conclusion. This study concurs with 11 previous studies in finding no compelling evidence that stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder leads to an increased risk for substance experimentation, use, dependence, or abuse by adulthood." Well, well, well...seems Jan has been hoisted by her own petard, oui? Mark, MD |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Letter to Editor USA Today
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Letter to Editor USA Today
"Mark" wrote in message ups.com... Jan Drew wrote: Jan Drew" wrote in message . .. You claim to be a pediatrician, kidsdoc and you don't know whaere this study came from? Use the exact words-- Stimulant treatment in high school also did not influence drug use in adulthood except for greater use of cocaine. http://www.google.com/ You can easily find it. If you cannot-- YOU are the loser. What dishonest Mark, MD snipped: No, you are the loser, harasseer and liar. You refuse to do your own homework. Norkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D Jeff P. Utz, MD. Sure it was easy to find. Then let Jeff--notkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D Jeff P. Utz, MD.--find it! It was also easy to see that Jan Drew dishonestly snipped and took a single sentence out of context, failing to include the actual conclusion of the paper: "Conclusion. This study concurs with 11 previous studies in finding no compelling evidence that stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder leads to an increased risk for substance experimentation, use, dependence, or abuse by adulthood." *Substantial* *real* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable* *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct* *reliable* *adequate* Well, well, well...seems Jan has been hoisted by her own petard, oui? Mark, MD No, harrasser, proven liar, and *gang member*, it just hoisted Your own. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Letter to Editor USA Today
"Jan Drew" wrote in message m... "Mark" wrote in message ups.com... Jan Drew wrote: Jan Drew" wrote in message . .. You claim to be a pediatrician, kidsdoc and you don't know whaere this study came from? Use the exact words-- Stimulant treatment in high school also did not influence drug use in adulthood except for greater use of cocaine. http://www.google.com/ You can easily find it. If you cannot-- YOU are the loser. What dishonest Mark, MD snipped: No, you are the loser, harasseer and liar. You refuse to do your own homework. Norkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D Jeff P. Utz, MD. Sure it was easy to find. Then let Jeff--notkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D Jeff P. Utz, MD.--find it! Jeff's credentials far surpass your own, Jan. You are in no position to sneer when you, yourself are evidence that midwestern highschools sometimes give diplomas to people who have not really earned them. It was also easy to see that Jan Drew dishonestly snipped and took a single sentence out of context, failing to include the actual conclusion of the paper: "Conclusion. This study concurs with 11 previous studies in finding no compelling evidence that stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder leads to an increased risk for substance experimentation, use, dependence, or abuse by adulthood." *Substantial* *real* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable* *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct* *reliable* *adequate* These are all perfectly useful words. Your contempt for them implies you prefer that evidence be insubstantial, imaginary, unconvincing, soft, vague, unreasonable, insignificant, incredible, noncompelling, scant, indirect, unreliable, and inadequate. Well, well, well...seems Jan has been hoisted by her own petard, oui? Mark, MD No, harrasser, proven liar, and *gang member*, it just hoisted Your own. The only proven liar here is YOU. ("I posted it with the permission of the author." Remember?) -- --Rich Recommended websites: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Letter to Editor USA Today
"Rich" wrote in message ... "Jan Drew" wrote in message m... "Mark" wrote in message ups.com... Jan Drew wrote: Jan Drew" wrote in message . .. You claim to be a pediatrician, kidsdoc and you don't know whaere this study came from? Use the exact words-- Stimulant treatment in high school also did not influence drug use in adulthood except for greater use of cocaine. http://www.google.com/ You can easily find it. If you cannot-- YOU are the loser. What dishonest Mark, MD snipped: No, you are the loser, harasseer and liar. You refuse to do your own homework. Norkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D Jeff P. Utz, MD. Sure it was easy to find. Then let Jeff--notkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D Jeff P. Utz, MD.--find it! Jeff's credentials far surpass your own, Jan. You are in no position to sneer when you, yourself are evidence that midwestern highschools sometimes give diplomas to people who have not really earned them. Irrelevant. As Usual. FACT: Jeff LIED!! It was also easy to see that Jan Drew dishonestly snipped and took a single sentence out of context, failing to include the actual conclusion of the paper: "Conclusion. This study concurs with 11 previous studies in finding no compelling evidence that stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder leads to an increased risk for substance experimentation, use, dependence, or abuse by adulthood." *Substantial* *real* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable* *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct* *reliable* *adequate* snip remaining harassing lying, and, spamming websites Well, well, well...seems Jan has been hoisted by her own petard, oui? Mark, MD No, harrasser, proven liar, and *gang member*, it just hoisted Your own. --Rich |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Letter to Editor USA Today
"Jan Drew" wrote in message . .. Jeff's credentials far surpass your own, Jan. You are in no position to sneer when you, yourself are evidence that midwestern highschools sometimes give diplomas to people who have not really earned them. Irrelevant. As Usual. FACT: Jeff LIED!! No, he didn't. YOU are the proven liar in this newsgroup. Remember? "I posted it with the permission of the author." -- --Rich Recommended websites: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Medical illustrators: Global effort for babies | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | April 23rd 04 11:34 PM |
Create Powerful Joint Ventures Starting Today | Ron Jay | Child Support | 0 | October 26th 03 07:07 PM |
40 weeks today | Alicia Elliott | Pregnancy | 7 | August 9th 03 11:49 PM |
A letter from 'Naldo! | glow | Child Support | 6 | July 30th 03 04:59 PM |
A 2003 reply to Gastaldo's 1997 letter to MOTHERING... | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | July 25th 03 05:53 PM |