A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Secession is necessary-Senate seeks to further rip-off fathers and their children



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 03, 07:42 AM
Edmund Esterbauer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Secession is necessary-Senate seeks to further rip-off fathers and their children


It is quite clear who will be paying for this new addition of an elite
bureaucrat into family law proceedings. It won't be those women who are too
lazy to work to support the children of the former relationship that's for
sure!

It is clear that secession is the only recourse available for decent people.
The corruption endemic in the government and their parasitic bureaucrats who
contribute nothing but misery to the lives of the productive in the
community makes secession and non-compliance with corrupt officialdom
necessary. These elite parasites live off the blood of children and their
families. They are also contributing to the decline of Australia and her
living standards. The total disrespects for the property rights of
individual in this country and the coerced levels of taxation now put upon
ordinary working fathers to support these useless bureaucrats is nothing
more than criminal activity by the State. We are dealing with criminals.
These criminals must be held accountable for their actions.

"The Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee (the Committee)
has made recommendations concerning the Family Law Amendment Bill 2003 (the
Bill). The proposed changes, recommendations and the issues raised are set

1. Recovery of child representatives' costs

Item 29 in Sch 7 of the Bill proposes to replace sec 117(1) with a provision
requiring the parties to bear their own costs and those of the child
representatives in such proportions as the Family Court considers "just".
Parties in receipt of legal aid funding, or who would suffer financial
hardship are excepted (proposed sec 117(1A)."
--
"The true value of democracy is to serve as a sanitary precaution protecting
us against the abuse of power...In its present form ..It has ceased to be a
safeguard of personal liberty, a restraint from abuse of government
power..It has on the contrary, become the main cause of a progressive and
accelerating increase in the power and weight of the administrative
machine."
Friedrich A. Hayek



  #2  
Old September 5th 03, 08:37 AM
shevek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Secession is necessary-Senate seeks to further rip-off fathers and their children

On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:42:49 +1000, Edmund Esterbauer wrote:


It is quite clear who will be paying for this new addition of an elite
bureaucrat into family law proceedings. It won't be those women who are
too lazy to work to support the children of the former relationship
that's for sure!

It is clear that secession is the only recourse available for decent
people.


See ya later then. Ta-ta...

The corruption endemic in the government and their parasitic
bureaucrats who contribute nothing but misery to the lives of the
productive in the community makes secession and non-compliance with
corrupt officialdom necessary. These elite parasites live off the blood
of children and their families. They are also contributing to the
decline of Australia and her living standards. The total disrespects
for the property rights of individual in this country and the coerced
levels of taxation now put upon ordinary working fathers to support
these useless bureaucrats is nothing more than criminal activity by the
State. We are dealing with criminals. These criminals must be held
accountable for their actions.

"The Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee (the
Committee) has made recommendations concerning the Family Law Amendment
Bill 2003 (the Bill). The proposed changes, recommendations and the
issues raised are set

1. Recovery of child representatives' costs

Item 29 in Sch 7 of the Bill proposes to replace sec 117(1) with a
provision requiring the parties to bear their own costs and those of the
child representatives in such proportions as the Family Court considers
"just". Parties in receipt of legal aid funding, or who would suffer
financial hardship are excepted (proposed sec 117(1A)."

  #3  
Old September 5th 03, 08:37 AM
shevek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Secession is necessary-Senate seeks to further rip-off fathers and their children

On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:42:49 +1000, Edmund Esterbauer wrote:


It is quite clear who will be paying for this new addition of an elite
bureaucrat into family law proceedings. It won't be those women who are
too lazy to work to support the children of the former relationship
that's for sure!

It is clear that secession is the only recourse available for decent
people.


See ya later then. Ta-ta...

The corruption endemic in the government and their parasitic
bureaucrats who contribute nothing but misery to the lives of the
productive in the community makes secession and non-compliance with
corrupt officialdom necessary. These elite parasites live off the blood
of children and their families. They are also contributing to the
decline of Australia and her living standards. The total disrespects
for the property rights of individual in this country and the coerced
levels of taxation now put upon ordinary working fathers to support
these useless bureaucrats is nothing more than criminal activity by the
State. We are dealing with criminals. These criminals must be held
accountable for their actions.

"The Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee (the
Committee) has made recommendations concerning the Family Law Amendment
Bill 2003 (the Bill). The proposed changes, recommendations and the
issues raised are set

1. Recovery of child representatives' costs

Item 29 in Sch 7 of the Bill proposes to replace sec 117(1) with a
provision requiring the parties to bear their own costs and those of the
child representatives in such proportions as the Family Court considers
"just". Parties in receipt of legal aid funding, or who would suffer
financial hardship are excepted (proposed sec 117(1A)."

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.