If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Christian Doctor Has Doubts About Study Indicating Ritalin-CancerLink
http://headlines.agapepress.org/printver.asp
"(AgapePress) - A pediatrician in Illinois says he's a bit skeptical of a small Texas study reporting a higher risk of cancer from Ritalin. Dr. Nick Yates, a spokesman for the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA), says there are a number of problems with the researchers' methods and further investigation is warranted." .... "Yates says among the problems with the Texas study is the fact that it was conducted in a "retrospective" manner. "What that means," he explains, is that the researchers "went back and looked at the records of children of those who were taking medications -- Ritalin or something else -- and then they would ask a question, as 'Did that child have an increased incidence of something else?'" Furthermore, the pediatrician points out, it is problematic that "the study is very small, and there is no control group." Still, he acknowledges that the Texas investigators' findings are worthy of concern, and he feels it is a good thing that federal health officials are looking into the study." "Personally, Yates considers Ritalin to be generally safe and effective, despite the risk of possible side effects. All drugs people take involve some danger, he says, "but the risks are not undue risks. And when used properly, medications -- with the correct diagnosis and the correct medical problem -- really are useful."" .... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Probert" wrote in message ... http://headlines.agapepress.org/printver.asp "(AgapePress) - A pediatrician in Illinois says he's a bit skeptical of a small Texas study reporting a higher risk of cancer from Ritalin. Dr. Nick Yates, a spokesman for the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA), says there are a number of problems with the researchers' methods and further investigation is warranted." ... "Yates says among the problems with the Texas study is the fact that it was conducted in a "retrospective" manner. "What that means," he explains, is that the researchers "went back and looked at the records of children of those who were taking medications -- Ritalin or something else -- and then they would ask a question, as 'Did that child have an increased incidence of something else?'" Furthermore, the pediatrician points out, it is problematic that "the study is very small, and there is no control group. ******" Still, he acknowledges that the Texas investigators' findings are worthy of concern, and he feels it is a good thing that federal health officials are looking into the study."********** "Personally, Yates considers Ritalin to be generally safe and effective, despite the risk of possible side effects. All drugs people take involve some danger, he says, "but the risks are not undue risks. And when used properly, medications -- with the correct diagnosis and the correct medical problem -- really are useful."" ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message ... http://headlines.agapepress.org/printver.asp "(AgapePress) - A pediatrician in Illinois says he's a bit skeptical of a small Texas study reporting a higher risk of cancer from Ritalin. Dr. Nick Yates, a spokesman for the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA), says there are a number of problems with the researchers' methods and further investigation is warranted." ... "Yates says among the problems with the Texas study is the fact that it was conducted in a "retrospective" manner. "What that means," he explains, is that the researchers "went back and looked at the records of children of those who were taking medications -- Ritalin or something else -- and then they would ask a question, as 'Did that child have an increased incidence of something else?'" Furthermore, the pediatrician points out, it is problematic that "the study is very small, and there is no control group. ******" Still, he acknowledges that the Texas investigators' findings are worthy of concern, and he feels it is a good thing that federal health officials are looking into the study."********** Exactly why I quoted that paragraph. He said "concern" not raving paranoia and making absurd outlandish claims, like you professional fearmongers. "Personally, Yates considers Ritalin to be generally safe and effective, despite the risk of possible side effects. All drugs people take involve some danger, he says, "but the risks are not undue risks. And when used properly, medications -- with the correct diagnosis and the correct medical problem -- really are useful."" ... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert wrote:
LadyLollipop wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... http://headlines.agapepress.org/printver.asp "(AgapePress) - A pediatrician in Illinois says he's a bit skeptical of a small Texas study reporting a higher risk of cancer from Ritalin. Dr. Nick Yates, a spokesman for the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA), says there are a number of problems with the researchers' methods and further investigation is warranted." ... "Yates says among the problems with the Texas study is the fact that it was conducted in a "retrospective" manner. "What that means," he explains, is that the researchers "went back and looked at the records of children of those who were taking medications -- Ritalin or something else -- and then they would ask a question, as 'Did that child have an increased incidence of something else?'" Furthermore, the pediatrician points out, it is problematic that "the study is very small, and there is no control group. ******" Still, he acknowledges that the Texas investigators' findings are worthy of concern, and he feels it is a good thing that federal health officials are looking into the study."********** Exactly why I quoted that paragraph. He said "concern" not raving paranoia and making absurd outlandish claims, like you professional fearmongers. "Personally, Yates considers Ritalin to be generally safe and effective, despite the risk of possible side effects. All drugs people take involve some danger, he says, "but the risks are not undue risks. And when used properly, medications -- with the correct diagnosis and the correct medical problem -- really are useful."" ... You emphasize that he belongs to a ' Christian ' contituency. ... implying ? RL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Raving Loonie wrote:
Mark Probert wrote: LadyLollipop wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... http://headlines.agapepress.org/printver.asp "(AgapePress) - A pediatrician in Illinois says he's a bit skeptical of a small Texas study reporting a higher risk of cancer from Ritalin. Dr. Nick Yates, a spokesman for the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA), says there are a number of problems with the researchers' methods and further investigation is warranted." ... "Yates says among the problems with the Texas study is the fact that it was conducted in a "retrospective" manner. "What that means," he explains, is that the researchers "went back and looked at the records of children of those who were taking medications -- Ritalin or something else -- and then they would ask a question, as 'Did that child have an increased incidence of something else?'" Furthermore, the pediatrician points out, it is problematic that "the study is very small, and there is no control group. ******" Still, he acknowledges that the Texas investigators' findings are worthy of concern, and he feels it is a good thing that federal health officials are looking into the study."********** Exactly why I quoted that paragraph. He said "concern" not raving paranoia and making absurd outlandish claims, like you professional fearmongers. "Personally, Yates considers Ritalin to be generally safe and effective, despite the risk of possible side effects. All drugs people take involve some danger, he says, "but the risks are not undue risks. And when used properly, medications -- with the correct diagnosis and the correct medical problem -- really are useful."" ... You emphasize that he belongs to a ' Christian ' contituency. ... implying ? The emphasis is not mine. Agape Press is a Christian site, and the subject line is the headline of the story. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert wrote:
http://www.neurodiversity.com/haley_reply.html http://www.neurodiversity.com/haley_reply02.html yes, Haley did not apologize. However, one of the attendees, who did use the term "Mad Child Disease" did. That speaks volumes about Haley's sensitivity (lack thereof). http://www.neurodiversity.com/reply_to_miller.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert is once again confused.
"Mark Probert" wrote in message ... Mark Probert wrote: Snip wrong post about Haley that has been discussed previously |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
Mark Probert is once again confused. "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... Mark Probert wrote: Snip wrong post about Haley that has been discussed previously Jan, if I stopped short, your proboscis would strike my duodenum. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert wrote:
LadyLollipop wrote: Mark Probert is once again confused. "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... Mark Probert wrote: Snip wrong post about Haley that has been discussed previously Jan, if I stopped short, your proboscis would strike my duodenum. Eeeewww!! More information than I needed there. I will have to go and wash my mind out with soap. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Bowditch wrote:
Mark Probert wrote: LadyLollipop wrote: Mark Probert is once again confused. "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... Mark Probert wrote: Snip wrong post about Haley that has been discussed previously Jan, if I stopped short, your proboscis would strike my duodenum. Eeeewww!! More information than I needed there. I will have to go and wash my mind out with soap. Just so long as Jan does not have to wash her..... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Classic Droan was R R R R, should I DOUBLE DARE HIM? ..was... LaVonne | Kane | Spanking | 0 | April 17th 04 07:13 PM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Spanking | 33 | December 10th 03 08:05 PM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Foster Parents | 31 | December 7th 03 03:01 AM |