If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Domestic Violence
"LaVonne Carlson" wrote in message ... Greg cut the post to which he was responding along with all attributes. How specific can Greg be, and why does he post in this manner? LaVonne Greg is practicing being evasive. Dan Sullivan wrote: "Greg Hanson" wrote in message om... You think a contract LISW would write such recommendations up in her report as a funny? Which recommendations? In what kind of report? In the CPS caserecord? Try to be specific, Greg. Dan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Domestic Violence
"sully's neighbor's dog" wrote in message ... bark-bark-bark http://tinyurl.com/teg0 Cool hat Dan, or is it your brain? All over here it became very clear and the night turned day and everybody to say waffles in the sand turned into the sea eventually. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Domestic Violence
bark-bark-bark bark bark! bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark bark! bark-bark-bark-bark-bark! http://tinyurl.com/teg0 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Domestic Violence
LaVonne wrote
Greg cut the post to which he was responding along with all attributes. How specific can Greg be, and why does he post in this manner? LaVonne: I'm right here. Why are you using third person? You asked this before, and I answered it then. I snip attributes for readability and size. I am not the only person who does NOT like the rampant over quoting that goes on, where one of Dan's one-liners is tagged onto two pages of quoted text. Nor do I much appreciate back and forth exchanges that involve 9 pages of 4 level deep quotation, when somebody only added 4 lines of text. It all seems a bit bureaucratic to me. Who is using a newsreader SO BAD that they can't look one or two messages back in the thread, to get the context? Dan is pretending that I am not revealing the most private documents because I am a liar or dishonest. His hostile intent is obvious and has been for quite some time. In another thread he tries to pretend that he intends to demonstrate his tactic to correct false information, but somehow he is posturing that he needs all 11 pages of a report on my family in order to demonstrate? Why would he need ALL 11 pages to show how he refutes bogus information in a report? He can't even show how he would make water flow uphill enough to correct the one biggie, the completely fabricated ""Sex Abuse History"". That is the biggest, most terrible lie in our case, cast suspicion over other things, and I have paper proof that it is not true, old documents from the very same Child Protection agency. Why would Dan need more than that to demonstrate his tactic to get false info corrected? We all know very well that Dan does not need protected information to demonstrate his tactic. Also, for some strange reason Dan wants my family's private records but he is unwilling to provide his own private information. Isn't that amazing, LaVonne? PS - Even if I sat down and typed in all 11 pages of some social workers gibberish, why would dubious Dan believe it was accurate? There is a generic problem like this with proof of anything specific and personal on the internet. Knowing this, what is Dan risking? He can deny whatever I post anyway! Very convenient for him. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Domestic Violence
"Greg Hanson" wrote in message om... LaVonne wrote Greg cut the post to which he was responding along with all attributes. How specific can Greg be, and why does he post in this manner? LaVonne: I'm right here. Why are you using third person? You asked this before, and I answered it then. I snip attributes for readability and size. I am not the only person who does NOT like the rampant over quoting that goes on, where one of Dan's one-liners is tagged onto two pages of quoted text. You mean so people can read what's being discussed? Nor do I much appreciate back and forth exchanges that involve 9 pages of 4 level deep quotation, when somebody only added 4 lines of text. It all seems a bit bureaucratic to me. Who is using a newsreader SO BAD that they can't look one or two messages back in the thread, to get the context? Greg, when you post some part of your "story" into a thread that has nothing to do with your case how can ya expect anyone who isn't stoned to the rafters (like yourself) to figure out the connection? Dan is pretending that I am not revealing the most private documents because I am a liar or dishonest. His hostile intent is obvious and has been for quite some time. In another thread he tries to pretend that he intends to demonstrate his tactic to correct false information, but somehow he is posturing that he needs all 11 pages of a report on my family in order to demonstrate? Because that's what you asked for. "How do you answer 11 pages of written caseworker LIES and exaggeration?" Why would he need ALL 11 pages to show how he refutes bogus information in a report? What's the problem if they're all, "LIES and exaggerations?" He can't even show how he would make water flow uphill enough to correct the one biggie, the completely fabricated ""Sex Abuse History"". I have never seen the "sex abuse history" or your supposed proof that it's fabricated. How can I make water flow uphill if I haven't seen the hill and you won't give me the water? That is the biggest, most terrible lie in our case, cast suspicion over other things, and I have paper proof that it is not true, old documents from the very same Child Protection agency. Why would Dan need more than that to demonstrate his tactic to get false info corrected? See above. We all know very well that Dan does not need protected information to demonstrate his tactic. Why are you protecting the info if it's lies and exaggerations? Also, for some strange reason Dan wants my family's private records but he is unwilling to provide his own private information. I didn't ask for your help, Greg. You asked for mine. Isn't that amazing, LaVonne? PS - Even if I sat down and typed in all 11 pages of some social workers gibberish, why would dubious Dan believe it was accurate? You've not even posted what these 11 pages are about. Visitation notes? The first 11 pages of the CPS caserecord? What are they? There is a generic problem like this with proof of anything specific and personal on the internet. Knowing this, what is Dan risking? He can deny whatever I post anyway! Very convenient for him. Then you shouldn't have bothered to ask, Greg. Dan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parents storm Chic. HS protesting no security, violence | Kane | General | 9 | February 13th 04 09:33 AM |
Greegor Cruisin' Again? or Parents storm Chic. HS protesting no security, violence | Kane | General | 0 | February 12th 04 04:36 AM |
Cytotec birth violence and AASP (also: Dubin: 'Prescribing drugs off label is fraud') | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 9 | October 29th 03 12:52 PM |
A Plant's Motivation? | Kane | Spanking | 44 | October 16th 03 01:51 PM |
OH holding state should not interfere with parental discipline | Fern5827 | Spanking | 1 | September 1st 03 09:56 PM |