If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Foster parents' fighting chance
Foster parents' fighting chance
A Times Editorial Published May 29, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's a scenario that can rip the heart out: a child pulled from foster parents who want to adopt him - the only family and stability he has ever known - to be sent off to live with a relative or couple he has never met. That doesn't happen frequently, but it does often enough to have compelled Florida lawmakers to want to provide an extra layer of protection. The Legislature this spring overwhelmingly approved a bill (SB 2046), by Sen. Walter "Skip" Campbell, D-Tamarac, and Rep. Nan Rich, D-Weston, giving foster parents the right to be notified and heard and making judges, not Department of Children and Families caseworkers, the final arbiters. The bill is on its way to Gov. Jeb Bush and deserves his support. All things being equal, extended family members should be favored when it comes to adopting abused or neglected children taken from their biological parents. But what happens when an obscure relative emerges on the scene, months or even years later, after the child has already bonded with his or her foster family? Traumatic to be sure, the abrupt move could also prove permanently damaging to the child. The bill would kick in only when the foster parents have cared for the child six months or longer and DCF has denied their formal application to adopt. Even then, it would not dictate the outcome but simply provide what foster parents currently lack: the chance to fight for the child, before the child is pulled from the home. DCF says that giving foster parents such standing would be expensive in cost and delays, but its objections are speculative at best. Though the agency might have a legitimate gripe if the second-guessing were more widespread, the bill is narrowly targeted. Its fundamental goal of protecting children should prevail over any desire on DCF's part to suppress costs or guard its turf. By signing the bill, Gov. Bush can help make sure that any decision to uproot a child from a loving foster home is worth the high price. http://www.sptimes.com/2004/05/29/Op...s__fight.shtml Defend your civil liberties! Get information at http://www.aclu.org, become a member at http://www.aclu.org/join and get active at http://www.aclu.org/action. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Basic Rights of Foster Parents | [email protected] | Foster Parents | 5 | December 20th 03 02:37 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
'Horrible' Home | Kane | General | 1 | July 16th 03 02:29 AM |