A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Questionable stats? (19th century stuff --Sorta OT)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 23rd 06, 10:48 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Serenity
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Questionable stats? (19th century stuff --Sorta OT)

Nightingale F. Introductory notes on lying-in institutions. London:
Longmans, Green, 1871:3
makes fascinating reading.

Nightingale sent questionnaires to institutions to try to ascertain the
"normal mortality rate" associated with childbirth. It would then be
possible to see if the rate at any particular institution was excessive. The
results were clear enough: "With all their defects, midwifery statistics
point to one truth, namely that there is a large amount of preventable
mortality in midwifery practice, and that, as a general rule, the mortality
is far, far greater in lying-in hospitals than among women lying-in at
home."9 Mortality rates could also be influenced by the age of the mother,
number of pregnancies, duration of labour, the general state of the place of
delivery and length of time kept in it, and such social factors as social
class, health, and stamina. It might be expected that women in workhouses,
because of their poverty and generally worse health, would have higher
mortality rates than women giving birth in regular midwifery institutions.
But this did not occur, and Nightingale concluded that the effect of the
institution on mortality rates, especially the presence of medical doctors
and students, was greater than that of social conditions.

Her figures for death from puerperal disease in 1867 is 1.6 in 1000 births.
The death rate was 5.1 per 1000 (births at home).

When she arrived at her hospital she found the rates to be 32 in 1000,
mostly caused by PF.

Nightingale was one of the earliest proponents of evidence based practice.

She is well worth reading up on.

Serenity



  #22  
Old September 23rd 06, 10:51 AM posted to misc.kids.pregnancy
Serenity
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Questionable stats? (19th century stuff --Sorta OT)

I expect he has interpreted the figure wrongly. (See my other message
below.)
This is likely to be 54 out of 1000 births resulted in death for the mother.
Of these 24 were caused by Puer fever.

S


read, "In 1857, 24 out of every 54 pregnancies in the U.S. resulted in
post-partum puerperal fever ... as a result o fpuerperal fever, 19 out
of every 54 pregnancies proved lethal to the mother.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kinda OT... Cleaning/Decluttering? xkatx General 130 April 1st 06 05:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.