If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Doctors Group Opposes Mandatory Mental Health Tests for Kids
http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.p...nt_ list_item
Dave Eberhart, "Doctors Group Opposes Mandatory Mental Health Tests for Kids", Newsmax, November 11, 2004, Link: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...1/140125.shtml Under new law being considered, the federal government would require that every child in America undergo psychological screening and receive recommended treatment, including drug therapies. Next week the Senate re-convenes to consider an omnibus appropriations bill that includes funding for grants to implement mandatory universal mental health screening for almost 60 million children, pregnant women, and adults through schools and pre-schools. But officials of the respected Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS) decry what they see as "a dangerous scheme that will heap even more coercive pressure on parents to medicate children with potentially dangerous side effects." One of the most "dangerous side effects" from anti-depressants commonly prescribed to children is suicide, regarding which AAPS added, "Further, even the government's own task force has concluded that mental health screening does little to prevent suicide." The bill would fund initiatives of the "New Freedom Commission on Mental Health," including a program designed to subject every school age child in the country to psychological testing and recommendations for treatment. The House has already voted to appropriate $20 million for the plan, and the Senate will be considering whether to bump it up to $44 million. Last September, AAPS lifetime member Rep. Ron Paul, M.D., R-Tex., tried to stop the plan by offering an amendment to the Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Act for FY 2005. The amendment received 95 "yes" votes, but it failed to pass. Paul tells NewsMax: "At issue is the fundamental right of parents to decide what medical treatment is appropriate for their children. The notion of federal bureaucrats ordering potentially millions of youngsters to take psychotropic drugs like Ritalin strikes an emotional chord with American parents, who are sick of relinquishing more and more parental control to government. "Once created, federal programs are nearly impossible to eliminate. Anyone who understands bureaucracies knows they assume more and more power incrementally. A few scattered state programs over time will be replaced by a federal program implemented in a few select cities. Once the limited federal program is accepted, it will be expanded nationwide. Once in place throughout the country, the screening program will become mandatory. "Soviet communists attempted to paint all opposition to the state as mental illness. It now seems our own federal government wants to create a therapeutic nanny state, beginning with schoolchildren. It's not hard to imagine a time 20 or 30 years from now when government psychiatrists stigmatize children whose religious, social, or political values do not comport with those of the politically correct, secular state. "American parents must do everything they can to remain responsible for their children's well-being. If we allow government to become intimately involved with our children's minds and bodies, we will have lost the final vestiges of parental authority. Strong families are the last line of defense against an overreaching bureaucratic state." "Congressman Paul and several of his colleagues will never give up," adds an AAPS spokesperson. "He and his colleagues have drafted a letter to Chairman Ralph Regula, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education Appropriations, asking for his help." The letter states in part: "We respectfully request that the following language be included in the final committee report on the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill for fiscal year 2005, or any report accompanying an omnibus bill containing the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education appropriations for fiscal year 2005: 'None of the funds made available for State incentive grants for transformation should be used for any programs of mandatory or universal mental-health screening that performs mental-health screening on anyone under 18 years of age without the express, written permission of the parents or legal guardians of each individual involved.'" By way of background: in April 2002, President George W. Bush created the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Its objective was to enhance mental health services to those in need. Among other things, the commission concluded that there is a need to search for mental disorders - especially in children - and the best way to do this was with mandatory mental health screening for everyone, starting with preschoolers. According to the Commission's 2003 report: "Quality screening and early intervention should occur in readily accessible, low-stigma settings, such as primary health care facilities and schools." The report goes on to say: "...the extent, severity, and far-reaching consequences make it imperative that our Nation adopt a comprehensive, systemic approach to improving the mental health status of children." However, critics of the plan suggest that the random testing of millions of people makes little sense to anyone but the drug companies that will stand to profit from the potential customers. The New Freedom Commission's proposed treatment programs are based on the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP). TMAP, which was first used in Texas in 1996 and has since expanded to other states, is a set of very specific medication recommendations - most of them new, expensive, psychotropic drugs. Despite the criticisms, the White House has remained solid behind the testing initiative, noting that the commission found that schools are in a "key position" to influence the phenomena of young children being "expelled from preschools and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviors and emotional disorders." But detractors are just as adamant that "problem" children in schools are readily identifiable, making the universal testing an unnecessary tool that does nothing but infringe on a parent's right to make decisions regarding their child's welfare. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Roman Bystrianyk" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.p...nt_ list_item Dave Eberhart, "Doctors Group Opposes Mandatory Mental Health Tests for Kids", Newsmax, November 11, 2004, Link: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...1/140125.shtml Under new law being considered, the federal government would require that every child in America undergo psychological screening and receive recommended treatment, including drug therapies. Next week the Senate re-convenes to consider an omnibus appropriations bill that includes funding for grants to implement mandatory universal mental health screening for almost 60 million children, pregnant women, and adults through schools and pre-schools. But officials of the respected Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS) Respected only by the whacko fringe. However, this is not a good bill. decry what they see as "a dangerous scheme that will heap even more coercive pressure on parents to medicate children with potentially dangerous side effects." One of the most "dangerous side effects" from anti-depressants commonly prescribed to children is suicide, regarding which AAPS added, "Further, even the government's own task force has concluded that mental health screening does little to prevent suicide." The bill would fund initiatives of the "New Freedom Commission on Mental Health," including a program designed to subject every school age child in the country to psychological testing and recommendations for treatment. The House has already voted to appropriate $20 million for the plan, and the Senate will be considering whether to bump it up to $44 million. Last September, AAPS lifetime member Rep. Ron Paul, M.D., R-Tex., tried to stop the plan by offering an amendment to the Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Act for FY 2005. The amendment received 95 "yes" votes, but it failed to pass. Paul tells NewsMax: "At issue is the fundamental right of parents to decide what medical treatment is appropriate for their children. The notion of federal bureaucrats ordering potentially millions of youngsters to take psychotropic drugs like Ritalin strikes an emotional chord with American parents, who are sick of relinquishing more and more parental control to government. "Once created, federal programs are nearly impossible to eliminate. Anyone who understands bureaucracies knows they assume more and more power incrementally. A few scattered state programs over time will be replaced by a federal program implemented in a few select cities. Once the limited federal program is accepted, it will be expanded nationwide. Once in place throughout the country, the screening program will become mandatory. "Soviet communists attempted to paint all opposition to the state as mental illness. It now seems our own federal government wants to create a therapeutic nanny state, beginning with schoolchildren. It's not hard to imagine a time 20 or 30 years from now when government psychiatrists stigmatize children whose religious, social, or political values do not comport with those of the politically correct, secular state. "American parents must do everything they can to remain responsible for their children's well-being. If we allow government to become intimately involved with our children's minds and bodies, we will have lost the final vestiges of parental authority. Strong families are the last line of defense against an overreaching bureaucratic state." "Congressman Paul and several of his colleagues will never give up," adds an AAPS spokesperson. "He and his colleagues have drafted a letter to Chairman Ralph Regula, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education Appropriations, asking for his help." The letter states in part: "We respectfully request that the following language be included in the final committee report on the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill for fiscal year 2005, or any report accompanying an omnibus bill containing the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education appropriations for fiscal year 2005: 'None of the funds made available for State incentive grants for transformation should be used for any programs of mandatory or universal mental-health screening that performs mental-health screening on anyone under 18 years of age without the express, written permission of the parents or legal guardians of each individual involved.'" By way of background: in April 2002, President George W. Bush created the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Its objective was to enhance mental health services to those in need. Among other things, the commission concluded that there is a need to search for mental disorders - especially in children - and the best way to do this was with mandatory mental health screening for everyone, starting with preschoolers. According to the Commission's 2003 report: "Quality screening and early intervention should occur in readily accessible, low-stigma settings, such as primary health care facilities and schools." The report goes on to say: "...the extent, severity, and far-reaching consequences make it imperative that our Nation adopt a comprehensive, systemic approach to improving the mental health status of children." However, critics of the plan suggest that the random testing of millions of people makes little sense to anyone but the drug companies that will stand to profit from the potential customers. The New Freedom Commission's proposed treatment programs are based on the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP). TMAP, which was first used in Texas in 1996 and has since expanded to other states, is a set of very specific medication recommendations - most of them new, expensive, psychotropic drugs. Despite the criticisms, the White House has remained solid behind the testing initiative, noting that the commission found that schools are in a "key position" to influence the phenomena of young children being "expelled from preschools and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviors and emotional disorders." But detractors are just as adamant that "problem" children in schools are readily identifiable, making the universal testing an unnecessary tool that does nothing but infringe on a parent's right to make decisions regarding their child's welfare. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Roman Bystrianyk" wrote:
But officials of the respected Association of American Physicians & Surgeons "respected"? "respected"? Splooooorrrffff!!! -- Peter Bowditch The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Roman Bystrianyk wrote: http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.p...nt_ list_item Dave Eberhart, "Doctors Group Opposes Mandatory Mental Health Tests for Kids", Newsmax, November 11, 2004, Link: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...1/140125.shtml Under new law being considered, the federal government would require that every child in America undergo psychological screening and receive recommended treatment, including drug therapies. Next week the Senate re-convenes to consider an omnibus appropriations bill that includes funding for grants to implement mandatory universal mental health screening for almost 60 million children, pregnant women, and adults through schools and pre-schools. But officials of the respected Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS) "respected." Yuk yuk yuk. decry what they see as "a dangerous scheme that will heap even more coercive pressure on parents to medicate children with potentially dangerous side effects." One of the most "dangerous side effects" from anti-depressants commonly prescribed to children is suicide, regarding which AAPS added, "Further, even the government's own task force has concluded that mental health screening does little to prevent suicide." The bill would fund initiatives of the "New Freedom Commission on Mental Health," including a program designed to subject every school age child in the country to psychological testing and recommendations for treatment. The House has already voted to appropriate $20 million for the plan, and the Senate will be considering whether to bump it up to $44 million. How many millions of school children are there in the US? How much testing can you do of each one for a buck or two? -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | August 29th 04 05:28 AM |
Mental health funds shouldn't go to HMOs | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | April 23rd 04 06:00 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | April 17th 04 12:24 PM |
Medication cut causes concern Some are taken aback after the North Broward Hospital District says it can no longer afford to provide drugs for poor people with mental illnesses.Medication cut causes concern Some are taken aback after the North Browar | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | February 6th 04 05:39 PM |
PPAC, vaccinations and chiro bouncer Bob (Bob Dubin, Diplomate, American Board of Chiropractic Censorship) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | September 6th 03 08:55 PM |