If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mark's Probert's Continual Harassing
Jan's Illiteracy
==== In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner. 92-02731 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747 November 9, 1992, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert. DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further, HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred. COUNSEL: Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner. JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur. Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further, Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further, Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further, Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law. OPINIONBY: Per Curiam. OPINION: [*282] [**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee. [**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion. The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct. The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/p...stprobert.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
Jan's Illiteracy **** you |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22... Jan's Illiteracy ==== In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group? Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me. Jeff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
So Jan starts a thread entitled "Mark Probert's Continual
Harassing"...then she posts a 13 year old legal petition that might not even pertain to "our" Mark Probert...and she posts a link to Ilena "I'm crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page... ....does this strike anyone else as just a little bit hypocritical? Mark, MD |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop:
Please remove misc.kids.breastfeeding from this Thread and all follow-ups. Thank you, Larry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff" wrote in message ink.net... "LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22... Jan's Illiteracy ==== In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group? You have been told. Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me. Jeff Rigggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttttttttttt ttttt. Liars believe other liars. Jan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... So Jan starts a thread entitled "Mark Probert's Continual Harassing"...then she posts a 13 year old legal petition that might not even pertain to "our" Mark Probert...and she posts a link to Ilena "I'm crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page... ...does this strike anyone else as just a little bit hypocritical? Mark, MD O000000000000000000000 Now we hear form Mark MD. He was silent when Mark posted Jan's Illiteracy What he calls Ilena "I'm crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page... Is, if fact EXACTLY What Mark has done. So, we have Mark MD lying for Mark Probert Disbarred attorney, known and proven liar. It DOES pretain to *our* Mark Probert The only Mark S Probert is NY. Our very own *Marla* From: "Marla Maples" To: Subject: Listserv? Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 06:50:44 -0800 Good morning! I am a woman who was harmed by breast implants. I had them removed, but I am still sick with FM and CFS. I read the newsgroup where you are medciless atacked. I feel so sorry for you. I see that you have a support listserv. Can I sign up? That way, I can avoid reading all that horrible stuff. Marla Maples Medford, OR Our very own own whos's wife sends me three e-mails out of the blue for absoluutely no reason, while all the bitching goes on about others contacting wives Mark want to know how this strikes anyone?? What a hoot. Anyone of the *gang* which we know beyond a doubt has LIED with and FOR each other, that's one reason they are known as a *gang* Welcome to EVIL *organized medicine* Jan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:qJ_re.62072$nG6.42820@attbi_s22... "Jeff" wrote in message ink.net... "LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22... Jan's Illiteracy ==== In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group? You have been told. Yes, I have been told that that is not the same Mark Probert. In a city with 6 million people, it is not that uncommon for too people to have the same name. Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me. Jeff Rigggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttttttttttt ttttt. Liars believe other liars. Nice comeback. Now, please come back with real evidence. jeff Jan |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message ink.net... "LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22... Jan's Illiteracy ==== In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group? You have been told. Told by whom? A bigot who relies on a stalker for information! There is no credibility from those two. Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me. Jeff Rigggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttttttttttt ttttt. Liars believe other liars. Like I said above, a bigot who relies on a stalker for information. For once, nincompoop, you are correct. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No dissenters in CT: Belt spanking w marks NOTabuse | kane | Spanking | 13 | March 31st 05 06:24 AM |
What kind of marks does tasering leave? | Fern5827 | Spanking | 1 | November 17th 04 01:30 AM |
stretch marks on growing tween | animzmirot | General (moderated) | 8 | June 30th 04 06:07 PM |