If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"Dusty" wrote in message ... Then the state would send him right back to prison to teach him the error of his ways for being in "contempt" of court - but they'd never toss him (or anyone else) into jail for owing a debt... -THAT- is EXACTLY how the Feds and states get around that pesky, little nasty bit of the Constitution that they don't care for. When did the Constitution matter in a divorce court. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"YooperBoyka" wrote in message
... "Werebat" wrote in message news:lI5Rf.87501$bF.39023@dukeread07... You know, there is really nothing I can say here that can illustrate what kind of a sad little person you are that will be more effective than the response you just gave (including the notable absence of a rebuttal to any of my points). Congratulations, I guess. ...and it took you *how* long to figure that out? not every one is slow like you. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"YooperBoyka" wrote in message
... "Tiffany" wrote in message news:T4kRf.22777$_f4.6764@trnddc03... "YooperBoyka" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:tghRf.571$5F1.555@fed1read08... "Joy" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... Both of them took the risk of pregnancy. The default position is that a baby results. The end result is that if a woman does get an abortion, then he's undeservedly off the hook. Then you must feel that she, too, is undeservedly off the hook, right? Sure. It follows that you are against abortion; unless you believe that one ought to be entitled to that which they do not deserve. I think that the opinions expressed in this discussion may be convincing many men that the best options are celibacy or masturbation. Might make life a little less satisfying for the women of the world. Wouldn't *that* be a bite in the ass! You don't think women can masturbate too?? Well,...if that's what you want out of life... Have at it. You are dumb as a door nail. You make an idiotic statement that says nothing. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"Dusty" wrote in message ... "SpiderHam77" wrote in message oups.com... marspamtin_ridspamdle wrote: It's not 99%. Even when used PERFECTLY (rarely happens) I don't believe condoms are 99% effective. But let's say it is 99%. A sexually active couple having sex, say, three times a week, would have sex about 156 times a year. If 1 in every 100 acts of sex results in a baby, the guy in this relationship is on the hook for one to two unplanned babies PER YEAR. So much for the "he shoulda wrapped his rascal" argument. Well then if that argument doesn't hold true, lets go back to the old argument... if your not ready to father a child, then don't have sex. I know Sex is alot fun, I rather enjoy it myself. However if I was truely concerned about my partner becoming Pregnant and using my Sperm without my permission, I would refrain from Sex all together. SpiderHam77 Ummm, excuse me, but there's something that everyone's forgetting. One very important FACT in all this - SHE LIED. She told him BEFORE all this bull **** happened... "Oh, darling, let's have sex. You want it. I want it. You know I want it. And you know I've told you a thousand times I can't get pregnant. It's impossible for me to conceive a child. So lets do the Horizontal Bop all night long. And in the morning, let's have hot, sweaty monkey love, too. 'cuz there's no way you could ever knock me up." Bull ****, bull ****, bull ****, bull ****, bull ****, bull ****!! What amazes me is that everyone here discussing it knows that SHE LIED. They've read it in the newspapers. They've heard it on TV and radio. They've read it here, on the groups (I know, I've been lurking and watching and reading all your posts! Hell, -I'm- the son-of-a-bitch who ****ing posted it in the first place!!!). They've discussed it ad nauseam. They almost know it by heart. It's been drummed into their thick, ****ing skills for weeks now - and they -STILL- don't get it!!!!!! What part of - SHE LIED - is so ****ing hard for you ****ing people to ****ing understand?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! It makes me want to ****ing scream!!! ****!!!!! Makes you wonder what her child will think of her knowing that her mother both lied and used her own kid to make a buck. OK. I feel better now. ------------------------------ Hey, Spider.. it's nothing personal, it was just one to many "keep it in your pants" replies that set me off. So don't take it that I'm PO'd with you, I'm not. --- see? |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:c_qRf.8628$z82.6655@fed1read07... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Then the state would send him right back to prison to teach him the error of his ways for being in "contempt" of court - but they'd never toss him (or anyone else) into jail for owing a debt... -THAT- is EXACTLY how the Feds and states get around that pesky, little nasty bit of the Constitution that they don't care for. When did the Constitution matter in a divorce court. Let me guess, you failed basic history in school, right? |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:45:01 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote: "Dusty" wrote in message m... Then the state would send him right back to prison to teach him the error of his ways for being in "contempt" of court - but they'd never toss him (or anyone else) into jail for owing a debt... -THAT- is EXACTLY how the Feds and states get around that pesky, little nasty bit of the Constitution that they don't care for. When did the Constitution matter in a divorce court. The Constitution of any country must ALWAYS APPLY. If it is not applied in all cases, then the document is not worth the paper it is printed on. Trampling on peoples rights just to make it easy and conveinient to force NCPs to "pay" is a total violation of an individuals rights. You want justice? How about ENFORCING the orders??? You don't need "new" laws and powers to do this, you just have to get off your ass and do a little work. But the government does not want to get off its ass and work. It wants problems to just "go away". And the easiest way to do that is to sell your rights down the river and hand power to a bunch of non-elected officials who can do whatever they want with virtual impunity. Your rights and freedoms have been on the slippery slope for decades now. By the time the majority realizes it, it may be too late. Better get used to living in a faacist state, 'cause you're pretty much there now. "Deadbeat Dad's" are the new "Jews" in your facist state. Just about any law that punishes a "Deadbeat Dad" can get passed, even ones that outright violate the Constitution. The question is, once the "Deadbeat Dads" have been vanquished, "Who's next?". One by one, groups will be identified, and rights systematically stripped. But it's ok as long as it is not happening to you, right? Like I said before, speak now or forever hold your peace. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
SpiderHam77 wrote:
marspamtin_ridspamdle wrote: It's not 99%. Even when used PERFECTLY (rarely happens) I don't believe condoms are 99% effective. But let's say it is 99%. A sexually active couple having sex, say, three times a week, would have sex about 156 times a year. If 1 in every 100 acts of sex results in a baby, the guy in this relationship is on the hook for one to two unplanned babies PER YEAR. So much for the "he shoulda wrapped his rascal" argument. Well then if that argument doesn't hold true, lets go back to the old argument... LOL, so this is a shell game then? First argument fails to lets try again with something else. if your not ready to father a child, then don't have sex. I know Sex is alot fun, I rather enjoy it myself. However if I was truely concerned about my partner becoming Pregnant and using my Sperm without my permission, I would refrain from Sex all together. SpiderHam77 You'd refrain from sex? Will you also tell your dog to stop scratching it's fleas? |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
Where did I say that?
So you want a government that control our every move?? You want to be told what you can and can not do, beyond basic laws?? T |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
Hey, how about people just keep it in their pants? Think that would
work? You really think that? Then why don't they just take the babies from the moms at birth, and force both parents to pay child support until one or both can work out a way to support the child together? Instead, they supplement the mother while going after the father for every penny that is paid to mom and child for welfare. If they really supported 2-parent families, they wouldn't have made it so easy to divorce, and for dad to supplement mom for years after. teachrmama wrote: "tonita" wrote in message oups.com... Each gender has a choice. People can choose to be more responsible, but they don't so everyone wants laws and procedures in place to clean up the mess. Actually what would be nice would be if government would butt out of family affairs. But if they choose not to do that, there should be equal choices for both genders. SpiderHam77 wrote: I agree with R here. If the woman does have a choice.. then so should the man. However the only large problem I can see here is that ROE vs WADE was never ment to be used as the ability to force men in CS. R vs W was never meant to be anything more then declaring that women have the right to choose for themselves if an operation can be conducted on them. It has nothing to do with Parental rights... It has nothing to do deciding paternity ect.. all the way down the line. So I applaud the efforts of such a case. However I don't think it will honestly have much of an effect as the Courts will probably come up with a ruling that will clarify such things. And that stuff like CS has be decided in the Legislature, not the courts. To me the only way we can protect my fellow men from such an unfair thing at this juncture in the game is education. Start teaching our men from an early age. Drill it into them that these women are evil, and want something from you. And we as men need to protect our sperm like it's a rare comdity. SpiderHam77 |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
Well blame it on anyone but the two adults involved, of course.
Cotrarily, it is the government which is the CATALYST for such arrangement. teachrmama wrote: "tonita" wrote in message oups.com... Each gender has a choice. People can choose to be more responsible, but they don't so everyone wants laws and procedures in place to clean up the mess. Actually what would be nice would be if government would butt out of family affairs. But if they choose not to do that, there should be equal choices for both genders. SpiderHam77 wrote: I agree with R here. If the woman does have a choice.. then so should the man. However the only large problem I can see here is that ROE vs WADE was never ment to be used as the ability to force men in CS. R vs W was never meant to be anything more then declaring that women have the right to choose for themselves if an operation can be conducted on them. It has nothing to do with Parental rights... It has nothing to do deciding paternity ect.. all the way down the line. So I applaud the efforts of such a case. However I don't think it will honestly have much of an effect as the Courts will probably come up with a ruling that will clarify such things. And that stuff like CS has be decided in the Legislature, not the courts. To me the only way we can protect my fellow men from such an unfair thing at this juncture in the game is education. Start teaching our men from an early age. Drill it into them that these women are evil, and want something from you. And we as men need to protect our sperm like it's a rare comdity. SpiderHam77 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFJA Position Statement: Child Support Enforcement Funding | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | March 2nd 06 12:49 AM |
AL: Court issues history-making decision in child custody case | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | August 3rd 05 01:07 AM |
Child Support Policy and the Welfare of Women and Children | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | May 13th 04 12:46 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
So much for the claims about Sweden | Kane | Spanking | 10 | November 5th 03 06:31 AM |