If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
http://www.ifeminists.net/e107_plugi...hp?item.6112.3
Texas State representative Harold Dutton has introduced legislation that would protect a father who pays child support for years before finding out he is not the biological father. PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. PS. I am a woman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
whatamess wrote:
PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. PS. I am a woman I used to be opposed to this for several reasons (privacy, pre-existing conditions, etc), but I am growing more and more agreeable to the idea for one simple reason: the child has a right to their biological father. And as far as I know, that's not a right that anybody (including the mother), can prevent. This whole Anna Nicole Smith business (in as sick as it is) seems to prove the point: so a lawyer can beat the father to the birth certificate and have rights even though the DNA says otherwise? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
On Mar 28, 8:27 am, John Meyer wrote:
whatamess wrote: PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. PS. I am a woman I used to be opposed to this for several reasons (privacy, pre-existing conditions, etc), but I am growing more and more agreeable to the idea for one simple reason: the child has a right to their biological father. And as far as I know, that's not a right that anybody (including the mother), can prevent. This whole Anna Nicole Smith business (in as sick as it is) seems to prove the point: so a lawyer can beat the father to the birth certificate and have rights even though the DNA says otherwise? I, like you, are very much a believe of people's privacy and rights, however, when allowing them privacy and rights infringes on the rights of someone else, like hundreds of fathers out there who pay support to kids who are not theirs or the thousands of children who have no idea who their dads are because their lousy mothers won't tell them or don't know, then that's when someone's privacy should be irrelevant. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
"whatamess" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.ifeminists.net/e107_plugi...hp?item.6112.3 Texas State representative Harold Dutton has introduced legislation that would protect a father who pays child support for years before finding out he is not the biological father. PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. Uhuh. And next they will tattoo "666" on your forehead. With all due respect, what the heck is wrong with you? PS. I am a woman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
"whatamess" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 28, 8:27 am, John Meyer wrote: whatamess wrote: PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. PS. I am a woman I used to be opposed to this for several reasons (privacy, pre-existing conditions, etc), but I am growing more and more agreeable to the idea for one simple reason: the child has a right to their biological father. And as far as I know, that's not a right that anybody (including the mother), can prevent. This whole Anna Nicole Smith business (in as sick as it is) seems to prove the point: so a lawyer can beat the father to the birth certificate and have rights even though the DNA says otherwise? I, like you, are very much a believe of people's privacy and rights, however, when allowing them privacy and rights infringes on the rights of someone else, like hundreds of fathers out there who pay support to kids who are not theirs or the thousands of children who have no idea who their dads are because their lousy mothers won't tell them or don't know, then that's when someone's privacy should be irrelevant. Well guess what, the burden of proof rests with the accuser. At least that's the way it used to be. And if the woman is accusing the man of being the father, the burden to prove so rests with HER! Ever heard of the Fifth? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
On Mar 28, 1:07 pm, "Chris" wrote:
"whatamess" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.ifeminists.net/e107_plugi...hp?item.6112.3 Texas State representative Harold Dutton has introduced legislation that would protect a father who pays child support for years before finding out he is not the biological father. PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. Uhuh. And next they will tattoo "666" on your forehead. With all due respect, what the heck is wrong with you? PS. I am a woman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What is wrong with me? I have nothing to hide, therefore, if someone wants to check anything out on me, I say, go right ahead...It's only those who have something to hide, that would be opposed to their child and father's or alleged father's child to have a DNA... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed TX legislation to protect NON-fathers
"whatamess" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 28, 1:07 pm, "Chris" wrote: "whatamess" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.ifeminists.net/e107_plugi...hp?item.6112.3 Texas State representative Harold Dutton has introduced legislation that would protect a father who pays child support for years before finding out he is not the biological father. PLEASE support this...I can hear the women now screaming saying that's not fair to the children...my belief? Every single child born should have a DNA test before leaving the hospital...if the alleged father is present, he should ALSO be tested...if the alleged father is not present, once the CSE finds him, he should be tested before any support is awarded...But I can assure you the women will scream about having to do a DNA test when the father does not contest the child is his...My take? If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason why you should not agree to do it. But it should be a LAW. Uhuh. And next they will tattoo "666" on your forehead. With all due respect, what the heck is wrong with you? PS. I am a woman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What is wrong with me? I have nothing to hide, therefore, if someone wants to check anything out on me, I say, go right ahead...It's only those who have something to hide, that would be opposed to their child and father's or alleged father's child to have a DNA... It's not a matter of "hiding" anything, rather it's a matter of privacy. Even so, is there something wrong with hiding things? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MI: Duped 'dads' seek relief - Legislation would reform rules on who pays child support to protect men forced to provide for nonbiological kids | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | March 21st 06 02:28 AM |
Important Legislation - YOU CAN HELP! | [email protected] | General | 1 | April 24th 05 06:23 AM |
'Three Strikes' for Abusive Parents Proposed | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 42 | March 14th 05 07:07 PM |
B/c FC abuses, strict new rules proposed PA | Fern5827 | Foster Parents | 0 | July 8th 04 06:31 PM |
Proposed NIP legislation in Illinois in the news | Irene | Breastfeeding | 6 | February 27th 04 03:15 PM |