If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NY: An unusual decision in custody case (but only to the "reporter")
An unusual decision in custody case
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...8oct02,0,14763 69.story BY ROBIN TOPPING STAFF WRITER October 2, 2005 Jodi Ann Fischtein wanted her 11-year-old son to move to Canada with her. But she and her ex-husband had joint custody of the boy, and the father wanted him to stay in New York. After a 28-day trial in Central Islip, State Supreme Court Justice John Bivona made a rather novel decision. The boy could go with his mother and new stepfather, who had been commuting to New York from Toronto. But Fischtein had to put up a $60,000 bond ensuring the father's visitation at least once a month, and pay his travel and hotel expenses. "Visitation with a parent is not the privilege of the parent but the right of the child. Both [the father and the boy] must have this right preserved by maximizing defendant's opportunity to maintain a positive and nurturing father-son relationship," Bivona wrote in the recent decision. However, he added the mother's "past conduct does raise concern as to whether she will cooperate and abide by the order of this court." Bivona directed that Fischtein post a $60,000 bond in the escrow account of the lawyer for her ex-husband, John Andrade, until her son becomes 18. Fischtein's attorney, Sari Friedman of Garden City, said the judge had later specified that her client put up $60,000 in cash in the account, which will be returned to Fischtein when her son is 18. "This is very unusual," said Friedman. "I think the judge was concerned that the relocation he was allowing was out of the country and out of U.S. jurisdiction ... and there could be problems for the father jurisdictionally if there is a proceeding for enforcement." Bivona cited as precedent a 1997 opinion in which a Supreme Court judge from New York City allowed a mother to relocate to Saudi Arabia with her child but ordered that she post a bond guaranteeing the father's visitation and adherence to the court's jurisdiction. Fischtein said she was surprised by Bivona's actions. "We are grateful for the decision but I was also dumbfounded. I was prepared to be generous in some way, letting [the child] spend a lot more time with his dad, but I wasn't prepared for this bond," she said in a phone interview. "It's a tremendous financial strain," Fischtein said. "It's like sending your child to law school." Andrade's attorney declined to comment. In requiring the bond, Bivona cited instances in which Fischtein had interfered with Andrade's access to his son since the couple's divorce last year. "Based on past history, plaintiff has dictated terms of visitation according to her whim," the judge wrote. Despite a separation agreement and both having joint custody, "plaintiff acts unilaterally." Fischtein said she didn't need the bond to follow the court's directives. "I have complied with every court order and never did anything out of turn. This is like a punishment," she said. -------------------------------------------------------------------- The reporter's bias against the boys father is plain for all to see. Did anyone else notice there wasn't a quote or interview with the Father? The only quote is from the mother (complaining, of course). -------------------------------------------------------------------- Liberalism: that haunting fear that someone, somewhere, can help themselves without Government intervention. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
An unusual decision in custody case (but only to the "reporter")
"Dusty" wrote in message ... An unusual decision in custody case http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...8oct02,0,14763 69.story BY ROBIN TOPPING STAFF WRITER October 2, 2005 Jodi Ann Fischtein wanted her 11-year-old son to move to Canada with her. But she and her ex-husband had joint custody of the boy, and the father wanted him to stay in New York. After a 28-day trial in Central Islip, State Supreme Court Justice John Bivona made a rather novel decision. The boy could go with his mother and new stepfather, who had been commuting to New York from Toronto. But Fischtein had to put up a $60,000 bond ensuring the father's visitation at least once a month, and pay his travel and hotel expenses. "Visitation with a parent is not the privilege of the parent but the right of the child. Both [the father and the boy] must have this right preserved by maximizing defendant's opportunity to maintain a positive and nurturing father-son relationship," Bivona wrote in the recent decision. However, he added the mother's "past conduct does raise concern as to whether she will cooperate and abide by the order of this court." Bivona directed that Fischtein post a $60,000 bond in the escrow account of the lawyer for her ex-husband, John Andrade, until her son becomes 18. Fischtein's attorney, Sari Friedman of Garden City, said the judge had later specified that her client put up $60,000 in cash in the account, which will be returned to Fischtein when her son is 18. "This is very unusual," said Friedman. "I think the judge was concerned that the relocation he was allowing was out of the country and out of U.S. jurisdiction ... and there could be problems for the father jurisdictionally if there is a proceeding for enforcement." Bivona cited as precedent a 1997 opinion in which a Supreme Court judge from New York City allowed a mother to relocate to Saudi Arabia with her child but ordered that she post a bond guaranteeing the father's visitation and adherence to the court's jurisdiction. Fischtein said she was surprised by Bivona's actions. "We are grateful for the decision but I was also dumbfounded. I was prepared to be generous in some way, letting [the child] spend a lot more time with his dad, but I wasn't prepared for this bond," she said in a phone interview. "It's a tremendous financial strain," Fischtein said. "It's like sending your child to law school." Andrade's attorney declined to comment. In requiring the bond, Bivona cited instances in which Fischtein had interfered with Andrade's access to his son since the couple's divorce last year. "Based on past history, plaintiff has dictated terms of visitation according to her whim," the judge wrote. Despite a separation agreement and both having joint custody, "plaintiff acts unilaterally." Fischtein said she didn't need the bond to follow the court's directives. "I have complied with every court order and never did anything out of turn. This is like a punishment," she said. -------------------------------------------------------------------- The reporter's bias against the boys father is plain for all to see. Did anyone else notice there wasn't a quote or interview with the Father? The only quote is from the mother (complaining, of course). Oh, but mom said she was prepared to be generous in her permitting dad to have visitation. How nice that she generously permits dad and son to spend time together!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Washington Times - Custody's High Stakes | Dusty | Child Support | 3 | July 13th 05 02:39 AM |
<----------- KANE | nineballgirl | Spanking | 2 | September 30th 04 07:26 PM |
Dad awarded full custody in Parental Alienation Case | NJ_Dad | Child Support | 3 | June 5th 04 06:56 AM |
Father Gets Child Custody in LaMusga Move-Away Case | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | May 2nd 04 09:13 PM |
| Most families *at risk* w CPS' assessment tools broad, vague | Kane | General | 13 | February 20th 04 06:02 PM |