If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
School disciplinarian removed 4 punishing by sentencing
A form of corporal punishment?
Well, the hands may become cramped and calloused. Gimmee a break. Posted on Thu, Feb. 19, 2004 School debates disciplinary methods At Cramp Elementary in West Kensington, an employee's job was shifted after he used a repetitive-writing punishment. By Susan Snyder Inquirer Staff Writer At Cramp Elementary in West Kensington, there's an argument about how students should be disciplined, and veteran educator Fred Creel is at its center. The clash between using stern, "old-school" methods, which Creel employed for seven years as disciplinarian, and teaching students to adopt "self-discipline," favored by principal Adrienne Carpenter, came to a head yesterday at a raucous meeting of more than 60 parents. Many parents demanded the return of Creel, who was transferred out of his post to a teaching position at Cramp in October after parents complained he made disruptive students write sentences such as "I will not hit or head-butt someone" 100 times. Officials at Cramp, a 900-student kindergarten-through-fifth-grade school, decided the writing assignments were a form of corporal punishment, and corporal punishment is prohibited by the district. Creel - who has worked 27 years at Cramp - also was accused of grabbing students and calling them names. Yesterday, Creel said, "Never in my life have I gone after a child to hurt a child." He said he did restrain children when they were fighting. And he said he never called children names, but told them: "We have no animals in school. Animals throw food. Animals spit food. Animals play with food. Animals open their mouths and show people what they're eating." Many parents at the meeting say that Creel's stern touch is needed and that student behavior has slipped dramatically since he was moved. Carpenter, who declined to comment on complaints about Creel, said she had appointed a new assistant principal - formerly a counselor - to oversee discipline. "He has the expertise and interventions that children need when they find themselves in altercations, arguments," she said. "He also has the interpersonal skills to deal with parents." The school continues to support sending disruptive children to a time-out room if needed and will suspend students for serious infractions, she said. But Cramp, like other schools, has decided that repetitive-writing assignments are not acceptable, said Sonia Perez, a regional administrator overseeing discipline issues at schools in the Kensington area. "To repeat a sentence is not a form of disciplining a child. It's a form of punishing a child. Every opportunity that we have, we should be teaching children self-management," she said. At the meeting, Creel said he assigned the sentence-writing as a way to let parents know the infractions that their children were committing and to make children think about their mistakes. Students would be required to complete the assignments at home. There is no districtwide policy that defines repetitive writing as corporal punishment, said district spokesman Fernando Gallard. But both district officials and a national discipline expert said the practice increasingly is frowned upon. "I don't view it as corporal punishment. It would have to be physically painful," said Irwin Hyman, a Temple University professor and director of the National Center for the Study of Corporal Punishment. "But it's stupid," he added. "Writing is something that kids should learn to enjoy. I wouldn't object to having them write an essay, something that is supposed to make you think." Harvey Rice, the state's safe-schools advocate, condoned the discipline tactic. "It's better than sending the kid home and suspending him and having him run the streets," Rice said. "We've got to get back to some kind of basic common sense here. That's an appropriate way of trying to get a message to someone about their behavior, and we should support that." Both Miriam Diaz, president of the Home and School Association, and Jeremy Centeno, a first-grade teacher and Cramp's teachers' union representative, backed Creel and said they saw nothing abusive or wrong with his methods. "When Mr. Creel would go into the lunchroom, you could hear a pin drop. Go in there now," Diaz said, adding that only three parents complained about Creel while many more supported him. One parent, Lourdes Sierra, spoke against Creel at the meeting. "You look out for him. I'll look out for the children," Sierra said. Later, she said she had seen Creel manhandle students and belittle them. "He would grab them by the arm, throw them against the chairs. I saw him grab a boy by the neck in the yard. The boy was saying, 'Get off me, get off me,' and he just kept going at him," Sierra said. At several points, the meeting became a shouting match with lots of participants. Creel waded into the fray and quieted the crowd, using the same tactic that he uses with children: "One, hands up. Two, mouths closed." -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Contact staff writer Susan Snyder at 215-854-4693 or . -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ © 2004 Philadelphia Inquirer and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. http://www.philly.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
School disciplinarian removed 4 punishing by sentencing
Fern5827 wrote: Officials at Cramp, a 900-student kindergarten-through-fifth-grade school, decided the writing assignments were a form of corporal punishment, and corporal punishment is prohibited by the district. Writing assignments as you describe are punishment, unlikely to deter the behavior but likely to discourage future enjoyment of writing. They are to be avoided but they are not corporal punishment. Creel - who has worked 27 years at Cramp - also was accused of grabbing students and calling them names. Grabbing students and calling them names is certainly a poor form of guidance and discipline and indicates a desperate adult. Yesterday, Creel said, "Never in my life have I gone after a child to hurt a child." He said he did restrain children when they were fighting. And he said he never called children names, but told them: "We have no animals in school. Animals throw food. Animals spit food. Animals play with food. Animals open their mouths and show people what they're eating." So, he compared children to animals. I'm sure this was meant to be a derogatory comparison or he wouldn't have make such a ridiculous comparison. I have always had animals in my home -- cats, dogs, guinnea pigs, mice, gerbils, hamsters, an iguana and a snack. I have yet to see an animal throw food, spit food, or play with food. I have yet to see an animal open it's mouth to show people what they are eating. Creel doesn't sound like the most informed or the brightest bulb on the planet, does he? Many parents at the meeting say that Creel's stern touch is needed and that student behavior has slipped dramatically since he was moved. Carpenter, who declined to comment on complaints about Creel, said she had appointed a new assistant principal - formerly a counselor - to oversee discipline. "He has the expertise and interventions that children need when they find themselves in altercations, arguments," she said. "He also has the interpersonal skills to deal with parents." The school continues to support sending disruptive children to a time-out room if needed and will suspend students for serious infractions, she said. He may have better skills than Creel (who doesn't?) but if he views guidance and disipline as only time out and suspension, he's only a slight improvement. But Cramp, like other schools, has decided that repetitive-writing assignments are not acceptable, said Sonia Perez, a regional administrator overseeing discipline issues at schools in the Kensington area. "To repeat a sentence is not a form of disciplining a child. It's a form of punishing a child. Every opportunity that we have, we should be teaching children self-management," she said. And, if we want literate children who enjoy reading and writing, do we want to use writing as a punishment? Sounds like good-bye and good riddance to Mr. Creel. LaVonne At the meeting, Creel said he assigned the sentence-writing as a way to let parents know the infractions that their children were committing and to make children think about their mistakes. Students would be required to complete the assignments at home. There is no districtwide policy that defines repetitive writing as corporal punishment, said district spokesman Fernando Gallard. But both district officials and a national discipline expert said the practice increasingly is frowned upon. "I don't view it as corporal punishment. It would have to be physically painful," said Irwin Hyman, a Temple University professor and director of the National Center for the Study of Corporal Punishment. "But it's stupid," he added. "Writing is something that kids should learn to enjoy. I wouldn't object to having them write an essay, something that is supposed to make you think." Harvey Rice, the state's safe-schools advocate, condoned the discipline tactic. "It's better than sending the kid home and suspending him and having him run the streets," Rice said. "We've got to get back to some kind of basic common sense here. That's an appropriate way of trying to get a message to someone about their behavior, and we should support that." Both Miriam Diaz, president of the Home and School Association, and Jeremy Centeno, a first-grade teacher and Cramp's teachers' union representative, backed Creel and said they saw nothing abusive or wrong with his methods. "When Mr. Creel would go into the lunchroom, you could hear a pin drop. Go in there now," Diaz said, adding that only three parents complained about Creel while many more supported him. One parent, Lourdes Sierra, spoke against Creel at the meeting. "You look out for him. I'll look out for the children," Sierra said. Later, she said she had seen Creel manhandle students and belittle them. "He would grab them by the arm, throw them against the chairs. I saw him grab a boy by the neck in the yard. The boy was saying, 'Get off me, get off me,' and he just kept going at him," Sierra said. At several points, the meeting became a shouting match with lots of participants. Creel waded into the fray and quieted the crowd, using the same tactic that he uses with children: "One, hands up. Two, mouths closed." -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Contact staff writer Susan Snyder at 215-854-4693 or . -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ © 2004 Philadelphia Inquirer and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. http://www.philly.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
School disciplinarian removed 4 punishing by sentencing
It amazes me how parents of children who misbehave in school are always
there to defend there poor little children when the school disciplines them. This sends the message to the child that in life they should not be held accountable for their actions. It's no surprise why these children cause so much trouble in schools today. And people wonder why zero tolerance laws and suspension in schools are so common. What other alternatives do you have when reasoning does not work? I guess these parents would rather their child be suspended and have a mark on their school records instead of having to write 100 sentences. BTW I had a coworker who's parents made her brothers write 500 sentences before while kneeling in rice! They got the punishment because they hurt their sister to the point where she had to go to the hospital. One hundred lines is nothing. Actually these parents are brats themselves and cause the same problems with their bosses at work that their children cause in school. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
School disciplinarian removed 4 punishing by sentencing
Billy sent in:
And people wonder why zero tolerance laws and suspension in schools are so common Wasn't there a murder of a sub teacher yesterday in WI by an Eagle scout & Honor student? I guess these parents would rather their child be suspended and have a mark on their school records instead of having to write 100 sentences. BTW I had a I remember in 2nd grade having to miss assembly to practing cursive writing my "R" 's. I had a coworker who's parents made her brothers write 500 sentences before while kneeling in rice! They got the ....Ouch. Sounds like a religious school..... My family pretty much supported the school. Then again, I was a good student. Unfortunately, when the little children become teens, lock-up is the preferred punishment. It is a rite of passage in some inner-cities for boys AND GIRLS. We as a society have no compunctions locking up these teens. We did not act early enough to re-direct the youngsters toward more productive behavior. Then....the legal system GETS 'em. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
School disciplinarian removed 4 punishing by sentencing
Fern5827 wrote: Billy sent in: And people wonder why zero tolerance laws and suspension in schools are so common Wasn't there a murder of a sub teacher yesterday in WI by an Eagle scout & Honor student? I don't know, Fern. Was "there a murder of a sub teacher yesterday in WI by an Eagle scout & Honor student"? And if there was, what do you think is the relevance I remember in 2nd grade having to miss assembly to practing cursive writing my "R" 's. I certainly hope you have great cursive "R's." What did that teach you about why you had to miss assembly? I had a coworker who's parents made her brothers write 500 sentences before while kneeling in rice! They got the ...Ouch. Sounds like a religious school..... Why would this sound like a religious school? My family pretty much supported the school. Then again, I was a good student. Because you learned to write "R's" as a punishment? Unfortunately, when the little children become teens, lock-up is the preferred punishment. It is a rite of passage in some inner-cities for boys AND GIRLS. Perhaps passing a law that sends a clear message to parents that discipline is about teaching, not punishment, would help. Perhaps passing a law that protects the rights of children from assault would help. Perhaps a massive education program that teaches parents how to parent and provide guidance without punishing, hitting, or hurting their children would help achieve your goals. So why do you fight so hard for the supposed rights of families to abuse their children? You supported a church that hung children naked in front of the congregation and beat those children, as long as there was parental consent. We as a society have no compunctions locking up these teens. We did not act early enough to re-direct the youngsters toward more productive behavior. Yes, we need to re-direct teenagers toward more productive behavior. Why do you fight so hard against agencies trying to do exactly what you recommend, and fight so hard for parental rights, while ignoring the rights of children and teens that suddenly seem to be in your "concern" in box. Then....the legal system GETS 'em. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
school in Germany | Marie | General | 11 | July 21st 04 06:35 PM |
| Suing a school 4 child endangerment & neglect FWD: | Kane | General | 4 | June 7th 04 12:38 AM |
Students increasingly being arrested for school offenses | Fern5827 | Spanking | 7 | January 9th 04 12:38 AM |
Philly public schools go soda free! email to your school board | Maurice | General | 1 | July 14th 03 01:05 AM |
Virtual school seeks Iowa funding | [email protected] | General | 4 | June 29th 03 12:55 AM |