its been fun re"

TJ although I agree with your views on most you should know that some of us
"New Wives" do not tryto push our husbands into not paying there support nor
are we "Jealous" of former wives my husbands former wife is unhapy with her
life and blew up like a cow after they seperated, she is bitter and hateful,
and I am thrilled with her life and mine, I love my stepchildren and I
tolerate their mothers. I am the one that cuts boths of his two exes every
two weeks.
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have some real
useful legal information in it.
I do understand the kind of people in yuou posting though you are not all
wrong, my exeaa new wife hates myself and my child, she goes out of her way
to be snotty and always seems to be worried that I am going to take her
husband. They havent payed anything on my sons medical bills copays or
deductables in which they are responsible for all since I pay for insurance,
I am not bitter about this either though. I payed for it because my son
needed it and it did not reak the bank to do so.
Anyway I just want to let yo know we are not all psycho *S*
Dawn

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
.....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==

gini52 wrote in message
...

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==



I thought she was really a he? Damn.... I just don't know. She is obviously
a bored person and though I got a kick out of the battle she started here,
going to an autism group and telling lies is just wrong. There are
definitely issues. LOTS of issues.

Tiff

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

gini52 wrote in message
...

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have
some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real
useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==



I thought she was really a he? Damn.... I just don't know. She is
obviously
a bored person and though I got a kick out of the battle she started here,
going to an autism group and telling lies is just wrong. There are
definitely issues. LOTS of issues.
==
Issues, indeed ;-) I think she/he was telling the truth in the autism group,
though. There seemed to
be too much detail for it to be lies. Maybe not. At any rate, she/he is one
sick person--the worst I remember showing up
here in years.
==
==

Tiff

gini52 ...

T.J.? Children? Yes, or no?
Anybodies guess?

Sorry, no cigar for right answer.

nm

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

gini52 wrote in message
...

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have
some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real
useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==



I thought she was really a he? Damn.... I just don't know. She is
obviously
a bored person and though I got a kick out of the battle she started here,
going to an autism group and telling lies is just wrong. There are
definitely issues. LOTS of issues.

First TJ was a man, then a woman, and then went back to being a man. This
whacko is definitely a gender-impaired misfit who admits to trolling
newsgroups and has proven themselves to be a pathological liar with a
pathological need for attention.

He's just doing the ol' "replying to my other personality trying to look
like I'm somebody who agrees with me" thing again....don't fall for it.

Mel Gamble

gini52 wrote:

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

gini52 wrote in message
...

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see
if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have
some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real
useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You
do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==



I thought she was really a he? Damn.... I just don't know. She is
obviously
a bored person and though I got a kick out of the battle she started
here,
going to an autism group and telling lies is just wrong. There are
definitely issues. LOTS of issues.

First TJ was a man, then a woman, and then went back to being a man. This
whacko is definitely a gender-impaired misfit who admits to trolling
newsgroups and has proven themselves to be a pathological liar with a
pathological need for attention.
==
And Tracy missed all the fun ;-)
==
==

"Melvin Gamble" wrote in message
...
He's just doing the ol' "replying to my other personality trying to look
like I'm somebody who agrees with me" thing again....don't fall for it.

Mel Gamble
==
Gawd Mel, now I'm sooo confused! Usenet is getting way too hard.
==
==

gini52 wrote:

"andygirl" wrote in message
. ..
TJ although I agree with your views on most
....................................
Some of us are not here to attack I joined this news groups to see if
there
were any posting that were not emotional but hat actually may have
some
real
useful legal information in it.
==
I don't think you got much in the way of stable emotions and "real
useful
legal information"
from T.J. It's interesting that you agree with most of her views. You do
realize that she is a
psychopath, don't you?
==

"gini52" wrote in message
...

"Melvin Gamble" wrote in message
...
He's just doing the ol' "replying to my other personality trying to look
like I'm somebody who agrees with me" thing again....don't fall for it.

Mel Gamble
==
Gawd Mel, now I'm sooo confused! Usenet is getting way too hard.
==
==

As you always say - listen to the written voice. The use of words and
phrasing always gives them away. This male, then female, then male again is
really a female. And it wouldn't surprise me the least to find out this is
Loony Lorain back for another round of pathologically insane dialogue. When
you posted the info about the autistic child I figured it had to be Loony
Lorain without all the pro-women studies and racist commentary.