A disconnect at camp

Barbara wrote:
So let's leave Lyn out of it. Sure, its reasonable to conclude your
child does NOT need a phone at camp. Why is it UNREASONABLE to
conclude that its a good idea for a child to have one for emergency
use? Why am I such a lousy mother, in your opinion?


Oh, *you're* not Barbara - just *me*. *I* am their target. This has
nothing to do with what's really being discussed. It's all personal
vendetta.

-L.

She stated clearly in her post that it was not a regular councelor. The
councelors did what they are trained to do.. CHEER UP THE CAMPER. Have you
ever been upset and people wanted you to smile so no matter what they did it
just TICKED YOU RIGHT OFF? and she was 16 While yes that is young it isnt
a child... unless that was a typo. Also she told other campers what
happened so I assume she knew what was going on. I said she reacted normaly
under the circumstances but if she had been forthright about what happened
then it may have changed how she was treated later.

I was molested myself in my own home by someone that should have been
trusted. I also reacted normaly but I did finaly tell and after that the
man was never allowed to enter the home again even though I did not find out
til much later that no charges where ever followed because I told the people
that needed to be told and I refused to talk about it again.

Tori
Did it ever cross your mind that the people *in charge* may have been
the ones molesting? That they may have had a "no phone calls for any
reason" policy? That she may have *tried* to tell someone but was
told to "shut up, buck up, quit crying, go sit down and join the
others"? You're talking about a CHILD here - who may not have even
known *what* had happened, but knew it was wrong and made her feel bad,
scared and confused. That she felt sghe couldn't trust an adult
because an ADULT who was *supposed to be trustworthy* did this to her.

The more I read the responses by the idiots in this ng, the more I pity
the children in this country. I really do.

-L.

On 12 Aug 2006 00:12:10 -0700, "-L." wrote:


Barbara wrote:
So let's leave Lyn out of it. Sure, its reasonable to conclude your
child does NOT need a phone at camp. Why is it UNREASONABLE to
conclude that its a good idea for a child to have one for emergency
use? Why am I such a lousy mother, in your opinion?


Oh, *you're* not Barbara - just *me*. *I* am their target. This has
nothing to do with what's really being discussed. It's all personal
vendetta.

-L.

*snort*
You place way too much importance on your existence in this group.

Nan

On 11 Aug 2006 23:36:56 -0700, "L." wrote:


user wrote:

Are you, or are you not, the same person signing as "-L" who
was castigating other parents a few months ago for letting their
children ride schoolbuses with "strangers."

The discussion was in regard to making an elementary school-aged child
ride *two hours* to school on a school bus - specifically a
special-needs child. Google it. I said anyone who made their child
ride TWO HOURS on a bus sucks as a parent. Yes, I said that and I
believe it. I also said that you have NO IDEA who is driving that bus.
That's a fact, unless you know the driver personally. For those
reasons, I believe *my child* is safer in *my own car*. So sue me.


Because really, the answer to that question speaks volumes about
your attitude, and responses.

That discussion has *nothing* to do with providing a child a means of
calling his parents if he is in trouble, in an EMERGENCY. Why the ****
you can't seem to understand that we are talking about an EMERGENCY is
beyond me.

Nope. You said your kid will have a cell phone because YOU want him
to, damn any policies. THAT is why your posts have been discussed.

But I get it. You're obviously one of those parents who simply doesn't
give a ****. Kids get beaten up, kids get bullied, kids get molested,
kids get raped. **** happens, eh?

Funny, you like to whine about being attacked, yet you do it yourself.
Pot
Kettle
Black.

Nan

Banty wrote:
In article , LaTreen Washington says...

Is that what happened to you Lyn?

That would explain your brain damage.

L. wrote:



So are you asserting that being ****ed up the ass is some sort of
"caharacter building" exercise? Did you even read the articles I
posted?

-L.



Oh, they got out!!

Back into your cell, Treenie and Lyn!

(Now, how'd they get out...? Nan - did you let 'em out??)

Banty



**** you, ****.

Nan wrote:

On 11 Aug 2006 11:17:18 -0700, Banty wrote:


In article , LaTreen Washington says...

Is that what happened to you Lyn?

That would explain your brain damage.

L. wrote:



So are you asserting that being ****ed up the ass is some sort of
"caharacter building" exercise? Did you even read the articles I
posted?

-L.


Oh, they got out!!

Back into your cell, Treenie and Lyn!

(Now, how'd they get out...? Nan - did you let 'em out??)

Banty


Nooooo, not me :-)
Hey, just recently Lyn was all aglow that Treenie said she acted like
a PNB. What a kick it must be for her to receive validation from a
Childfree. Wonder what changed his mind?

Nan


Blow me you trailer-trash moo.

LaTreen Washington wrote:

Blow me you trailer-trash moo.

She is trailer trash. So trailer trash that she supposedly has to buy
used household appliances.

-L.

On 12 Aug 2006 17:56:10 -0700, "L." wrote:


LaTreen Washington wrote:

Blow me you trailer-trash moo.

She is trailer trash. So trailer trash that she supposedly has to buy
used household appliances.

-L.

FREE, you silly cow. I call that good economics.

Nan

Yup once my mom got a brand new stove for 50$ because within 2 months of
someone buying it they decided to switch to a gas stove instead of
electric.. hmmm buy a 2 month old stove for 50$ or a pay 400$ for the same
model new.. hmmmm cannt decide.

Tori
"Nan" wrote in message
...
On 12 Aug 2006 17:56:10 -0700, "L." wrote:


LaTreen Washington wrote:

Blow me you trailer-trash moo.

She is trailer trash. So trailer trash that she supposedly has to buy
used household appliances.

-L.

FREE, you silly cow. I call that good economics.

Nan

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:09:08 -0500, "Tori M"
wrote:

Yup once my mom got a brand new stove for 50$ because within 2 months of
someone buying it they decided to switch to a gas stove instead of
electric.. hmmm buy a 2 month old stove for 50$ or a pay 400$ for the same
model new.. hmmmm cannt decide.

Tori

Oooh, I know! Lyn would pay the $400 for a new one since buying a
USED one would make her trailer trash.
Personally, I'll take the free gas oven I got off Freecycle from
someone that decided to upgrade when her catering biz got off the
ground. It works great!

Nan

"Nan" wrote in message
.. .
On 12 Aug 2006 17:56:10 -0700, "L." wrote:


LaTreen Washington wrote:

Blow me you trailer-trash moo.

She is trailer trash. So trailer trash that she supposedly has to buy
used household appliances.

-L.

FREE, you silly cow. I call that good economics.

Nan