Lawsuit filed against Virginia's DCSE in Richmond U.S. District Court...

I'll have the complaint on childsupportnews.com as soon as it's placed
on the PACER system.

wrote:
I'll have the complaint on childsupportnews.com as soon as it's placed
on the PACER system.

WHY can't fatherscum just keep their heads DOWN and PAY for their CRIMES?

We WASTE a lot of TIME and ENERGY in this courtroom pandering to the
lazy shenanigans of fatherscum. I say we've had ENOUGH! LOCK 'em UP!!!

- Ron ^*^

childsupportnews.com

Lots of bandwith: One Member )=

"LLL" wrote in message
ups.com...
childsupportnews.com

Lots of bandwith: One Member )=

Briggman likes to hear himself talk.

Now if you want to see what others say about/to him, do a Google Newsgroups
search on "Briggman" - his posting and business reputation go back to before
1998. It's not pretty.

If you want to see how obnoxious he is, go to
http://groups.google.com/group/va.ge...f2184435bc8495
and read the thread from the top.

And he wonders why he can't get any sympathy from the courts.

Mazor, the pilot wannabe.

Mazor speaks for the Airline Pilots Association.

Yawn.

Go back to sleep, Mazor.

And all of those postings from "flash/gary brook/whomever" cost the guy
a $150,000 judgment for libel -- without an attorney...you may wish to
check current defamation law to ascertain what kind of penalties can be
had for republishing defamatory statements.

And as far as one liking to listen to hear one's self speak, aren't you
the spokesman for the Airline Pilots Association, whose member airlines
are walking into bankruptcy court everyday because your members want so
much money?

No I don't know about the rest of the people reading these groups, but
I think a spokesman probably lieks to hear one's self speak more than
someone informing people about child support.

You're still a ******, Mazor.

You don't every seem to carry much respect - even in newsgroups
related to your profession.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22john+mazor%22

Everybody needs to excuse Mazor, he's been exposed to too much laser
illumination.

I can't believe someone who's the spokesman for a professional
organization would "lower themselves" to be concerned with anything I
posted.

wrote:

And all of those postings from "flash/gary brook/whomever" cost the guy
a $150,000 judgment for libel -- without an attorney...you may wish to
check current defamation law to ascertain what kind of penalties can be
had for republishing defamatory statements.

This word, "republishing"... I am not sure it means what you think that
it means...

- Ron ^*^

Oh, I don't know, Ron.

Here's a UFL law professor's views...and she's teaching the lawyers:

http://maudnewton.com/blog/index.php?p=3899


Werebat wrote:
wrote:

And all of those postings from "flash/gary brook/whomever" cost the guy
a $150,000 judgment for libel -- without an attorney...you may wish to
check current defamation law to ascertain what kind of penalties can be
had for republishing defamatory statements.

This word, "republishing"... I am not sure it means what you think that
it means...

- Ron ^*^

wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh, I don't know, Ron.

Here's a UFL law professor's views...and she's teaching the lawyers:

http://maudnewton.com/blog/index.php?p=3899


And what does this ****ing match between the 2 of you have to do with child
support?

Absolutely nothing...but then, I didn't start this.