HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in Federal Court!

CORRECTION:


As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

Note from Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal:
www.ilenarose.blogspot.com

You can repeat your lies, just like other Vaccination & Breast Implant
Flacks do a thousand times, Myrl Jeffcoat ... and they are still lies.

Myrl continues to lie for the Vaccination Industry:

"According to the CDC and most recognized sources, the year mercury
was removed from childhood vaccines was 2001."

As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

2001 was the year the Vac Makers had to stop adding it to the majority
of vaccinations ... but obviously, it would take years to get all of
their widely advertised and distributed stock out of doctors offices,
clinics, hospitals, etc. etc. etc. etc.

Further, as Dr. Jay Gordon explains in May 2005:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-go...-a_b_1634.html

The American Academy of Pediatrics (of which I have been a member for
a quarter century) has a very cozy relationship with the vaccine
industry. Most authors and speakers in the vaccine controversy have
been paid consultants to the vaccine industry. Most of these
researchers still accept funds while commenting on the issues.

However, even the AAP has been adamant about removing mercury from
childhood vaccines. They have failed in these efforts: The flu shot
has as much mercury preservative as any shot has ever had and, up
until a few months ago it was impossible to get a mercury-free tetanus
shot.

~~~

So thank you Myrl for your quotable propaganda and misrepresentations
of the Vaccination Industry.
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm

UPDATE!!!!

Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal, applauds David Kirby and thanks him
for helping expose this covered-up document and bringing it to life.

The breast implant / vaccinations industires have long forced "gag"
orders on losing cases such as this. This stayed covered up only
around 4 months ... despite their best efforts.

May God protect him and all the rest of us exposing the real
Snake-oil ... Vaccinations.
http://ilenarose.blogspot.com

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm
Partial List of Vaccination Propagandists seen thoughout the net ...

EXCERPT: In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet
the statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD
received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying
mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular
energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with
features of autism spectrum disorder. Therefore, respondent recommends
that compensation be awarded to petitioners in accordance with 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(C)(ii).


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-...-_b_88558.html

Below is a verbatim copy of the US Government concession filed last
November in a vaccine-autism case in the Court of Federal Claims, with
the names of the family redacted. It is the subject of my post
yesterday.


Every American should read this document, and interpret for themselves
what they think their government is trying to say about the
relationship, if any, between immunizations and a diagnosis of autism
spectrum disorder.

If you feel this document suggests that some kind of link may be
possible, you might consider forwarding it to your elected
representatives for further investigation.

But, of course, if you feel that this document in no way implicates
vaccines, then let's just keep going about our business as usual and
not pay any attention to all those sick kids behind the curtain.


IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS


CHILD, a minor,

by her Parents and Natural Guardians,

Petitioners,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT'S RULE 4(c) REPORT

In accordance with RCFC, Appendix B, Vaccine Rule 4(c), the
Secretary of Health and Human Services submits the following response
to the petition for compensation filed in this case.

FACTS

CHILD ("CHILD") was born on December --, 1998, and weighed eight
pounds, ten ounces. Petitioners' Exhibit ("Pet. Ex.") 54 at 13. The
pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes. Id. at 13. CHILD
received her first Hepatitis B immunization on December 27, 1998. Pet.
Ex. 31 at 2.

From January 26, 1999 through June 28, 1999, CHILD visited the
Pediatric Center, in Catonsville, Maryland, for well-child
examinations and minor complaints, including fever and eczema. Pet.
Ex. 31 at 5-10, 19. During this time period, she received the
following pediatric vaccinations, without incident:

Vaccine Dates Administered

Hep B 12/27/98; 1/26/99

IPV 3/12/99; 4/27/99

Hib 3/12/99; 4/27/99; 6/28/99

DTaP 3/12/99; 4/27/99; 6/28/99

Id. at 2.

At seven months of age, CHILD was diagnosed with bilateral otitis
media. Pet. Ex. 31 at 20. In the subsequent months between July 1999
and January 2000, she had frequent bouts of otitis media, which
doctors treated with multiple antibiotics. Pet. Ex. 2 at 4. On
December 3,1999, CHILD was seen by Karl Diehn, M.D., at Ear, Nose, and
Throat Associates of the Greater Baltimore Medical Center ("ENT
Associates"). Pet. Ex. 31 at 44. Dr. Diehn recommend that CHILD
receive PE tubes for her "recurrent otitis media and serious otitis."
Id. CHILD received PE tubes in January 2000. Pet. Ex. 24 at 7. Due to
CHILD's otitis media, her mother did not allow CHILD to receive the
standard 12 and 15 month childhood immunizations. Pet. Ex. 2 at 4.

According to the medical records, CHILD consistently met her
developmental milestones during the first eighteen months of her life.
The record of an October 5, 1999 visit to the Pediatric Center notes
that CHILD was mimicking sounds, crawling, and sitting. Pet. Ex. 31 at
9. The record of her 12-month pediatric examination notes that she was
using the words "Mom" and "Dad," pulling herself up, and cruising. Id.
at 10.

At a July 19, 2000 pediatric visit, the pediatrician observed that
CHILD "spoke well" and was "alert and active." Pet. Ex. 31 at 11.
CHILD's mother reported that CHILD had regular bowel movements and
slept through the night. Id. At the July 19, 2000 examination, CHILD
received five vaccinations - DTaP, Hib, MMR, Varivax, and IPV. Id. at
2, 11.

According to her mother's affidavit, CHILD developed a fever of
102.3 degrees two days after her immunizations and was lethargic,
irritable, and cried for long periods of time. Pet. Ex. 2 at 6. She
exhibited intermittent, high-pitched screaming and a decreased
response to stimuli. Id. MOM spoke with the pediatrician, who told her
that CHILD was having a normal reaction to her immunizations. Id.
According to CHILD's mother, this behavior continued over the next ten
days, and CHILD also began to arch her back when she cried. Id.

On July 31, 2000, CHILD presented to the Pediatric Center with a
101-102 degree temperature, a diminished appetite, and small red dots
on her chest. Pet. Ex. 31 at 28. The nurse practitioner recorded that
CHILD was extremely irritable and inconsolable. Id. She was diagnosed
with a post-varicella vaccination rash. Id. at 29.

Two months later, on September 26, 2000, CHILD returned to the
Pediatric Center with a temperature of 102 degrees, diarrhea, nasal
discharge, a reduced appetite, and pulling at her left ear. Id. at 29.
Two days later, on September 28, 2000, CHILD was again seen at the
Pediatric Center because her diarrhea continued, she was congested,
and her mother reported that CHILD was crying during urination. Id. at
32. On November 1, 2000, CHILD received bilateral PE tubes. Id. at 38.
On November 13, 2000, a physician at ENT Associates noted that CHILD
was "obviously hearing better" and her audiogram was normal. Id. at
38. On November 27, 2000, CHILD was seen at the Pediatric Center with
complaints of diarrhea, vomiting, diminished energy, fever, and a rash
on her cheek. Id. at 33. At a follow-up visit, on December 14, 2000,
the doctor noted that CHILD had a possible speech delay. Id.

CHILD was evaluated at the Howard County Infants and Toddlers
Program, on November 17, 2000, and November 28, 2000, due to concerns
about her language development. Pet. Ex. 19 at 2, 7. The assessment
team observed deficits in CHILD's communication and social
development. Id. at 6. CHILD's mother reported that CHILD had become
less responsive to verbal direction in the previous four months and
had lost some language skills. Id. At 2.

On December 21, 2000, CHILD returned to ENT Associates because of
an obstruction in her right ear and fussiness. Pet. Ex. 31 at 39. Dr.
Grace Matesic identified a middle ear effusion and recorded that CHILD
was having some balance issues and not progressing with her speech.
Id. On December 27, 2000, CHILD visited ENT Associates, where Dr.
Grace Matesic observed that CHILD's left PE tube was obstructed with
crust. Pet. Ex. 14 at 6. The tube was replaced on January 17, 2001.
Id.

Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a pediatric neurologist, evaluated CHILD at
the Kennedy Krieger Children's Hospital Neurology Clinic ("Krieger
Institute"), on February 8, 2001. Pet. Ex. 25 at 1. Dr. Zimmerman
reported that after CHILD's immunizations of July 19, 2000, an
"encephalopathy progressed to persistent loss of previously acquired
language, eye contact, and relatedness." Id. He noted a disruption in
CHILD's sleep patterns, persistent screaming and arching, the
development of pica to foreign objects, and loose stools. Id. Dr.
Zimmerman observed that CHILD watched the fluorescent lights
repeatedly during the examination and

would not make eye contact. Id. He diagnosed CHILD with
"regressive encephalopathy with features consistent with an autistic
spectrum disorder, following normal development." Id. At 2. Dr.
Zimmerman ordered genetic testing, a magnetic resonance imaging test
("MRI"), and an electroencephalogram ("EEG"). Id.

Dr. Zimmerman referred CHILD to the Krieger Institute's
Occupational Therapy Clinic and the Center for Autism and Related
Disorders ("CARDS"). Pet. Ex. 25 at 40. She was evaluated at the
Occupational Therapy Clinic by Stacey Merenstein, OTR/L, on February
23, 2001. Id. The evaluation report summarized that CHILD had deficits
in "many areas of sensory processing which decrease[d] her ability to
interpret sensory input and influence[d] her motor performance as a
result." Id. at 45. CHILD was evaluated by Alice Kau and Kelley Duff,
on May 16, 2001, at CARDS. Pet. Ex. 25 at 17. The clinicians concluded
that CHILD was developmentally delayed and demonstrated features of
autistic disorder. Id. at 22.

CHILD returned to Dr. Zimmerman, on May 17, 2001, for a follow-up
consultation. Pet. Ex. 25 at 4. An overnight EEG, performed on April
6, 2001, showed no seizure discharges. Id. at 16. An MRI, performed on
March 14, 2001, was normal. Pet. Ex. 24 at 16. A G-band test revealed
a normal karyotype. Pet. Ex. 25 at 16. Laboratory studies, however,
strongly indicated an underlying mitochondrial disorder. Id. at 4.

Dr. Zimmerman referred CHILD for a neurogenetics consultation to
evaluate her abnormal metabolic test results. Pet. Ex. 25 at 8. CHILD
met with Dr. Richard Kelley, a specialist in neurogenetics, on May 22,
2001, at the Krieger Institute. Id. In his assessment, Dr. Kelley
affirmed that CHILD's history and lab results were consistent with "an
etiologically unexplained metabolic disorder that appear[ed] to be a
common cause of developmental regression." Id. at 7. He continued to
note that children with biochemical profiles similar to CHILD's
develop normally until sometime between the first and second year of
life when their metabolic pattern becomes apparent, at which time they
developmentally regress. Id. Dr. Kelley described this condition as
"mitochondrial PPD." Id.

On October 4, 2001, Dr. John Schoffner, at Horizon Molecular
Medicine in Norcross, Georgia, examined CHILD to assess whether her
clinical manifestations were related to a defect in cellular
energetics. Pet. Ex. 16 at 26. After reviewing her history, Dr.
Schoffner agreed that the previous metabolic testing was "suggestive
of a defect in cellular energetics." Id. Dr. Schoffner recommended a
muscle biopsy, genetic testing, metabolic testing, and cell culture
based testing. Id. at 36. A CSF organic acids test, on January 8,
2002, displayed an increased lactate to pyruvate ratio of 28,1 which
can be seen in disorders of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation.
Id. at 22. A muscle biopsy test for oxidative phosphorylation disease
revealed abnormal results for Type One and Three. Id. at 3. The most
prominent findings were scattered atrophic myofibers that were mostly
type one oxidative phosphorylation dependent myofibers, mild increase
in lipid in selected myofibers, and occasional myofiber with reduced
cytochrome c oxidase activity. Id. at 7. After reviewing these
laboratory results, Dr. Schoffner diagnosed CHILD with oxidative
phosphorylation disease. Id. at 3. In February 2004, a mitochondrial
DNA ("mtDNA") point mutation analysis revealed a single nucleotide
change in the 16S ribosomal RNA gene (T2387C). Id. at 11.

CHILD returned to the Krieger Institute, on July 7, 2004, for a
follow-up evaluation with Dr. Zimmerman. Pet. Ex. 57 at 9. He reported
CHILD "had done very well" with treatment for a mitochondrial
dysfunction. Dr. Zimmerman concluded that CHILD would continue to
require services in speech, occupational, physical, and behavioral
therapy. Id.

On April 14, 2006, CHILD was brought by ambulance to Athens
Regional Hospital and developed a tonic seizure en route. Pet. Ex. 10
at 38. An EEG showed diffuse slowing. Id. At 40. She was diagnosed
with having experienced a prolonged complex partial seizure and
transferred to Scottish Rite Hospital. Id. at 39, 44. She experienced
no more seizures while at Scottish Rite Hospital and was discharged on
the medications Trileptal and Diastal. Id. at 44. A follow-up MRI of
the brain, on June 16, 2006, was normal with evidence of a left
mastoiditis manifested by distortion of the air cells. Id. at 36. An
EEG, performed on August 15, 2006,

showed "rhythmic epileptiform discharges in the right temporal
region and then focal slowing during a witnessed clinical seizure."
Id. At 37. CHILD continues to suffer from a seizure disorder.

ANALYSIS

Medical personnel at the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation,
Department of Health and Human Services (DVIC) have reviewed the facts
of this case, as presented by the petition, medical records, and
affidavits. After a thorough review, DVIC has concluded that
compensation is appropriate in this case.

In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet the
statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD
received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying
mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular
energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with
features of autism spectrum disorder. Therefore, respondent recommends
that compensation be awarded to petitioners in accordance with 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(C)(ii).

DVIC has concluded that CHILD's complex partial seizure disorder,
with an onset of almost six years after her July 19, 2000
vaccinations, is not related to a vaccine-injury.

Respectfully submitted,

PETER D. KEISLER
Assistant Attorney General

TIMOTHY P. GARREN
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division

MARK W. ROGERS
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division

VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ Linda S. Renzi by s/ Lynn E. Ricciardella
LINDA S. RENZI
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
(202) 616-4133


DATE: November 9, 2007

On Feb 28, 2:59*pm, Ilena Rose wrote:
CORRECTION:

As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

Note from Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal:www.ilenarose.blogspot.com

You can repeat your lies, just like other Vaccination & Breast Implant
Flacks do a thousand times, Myrl Jeffcoat ... and they are still lies.

Myrl continues to lie for the Vaccination Industry:

"According to the CDC and most recognized sources, the year mercury
was removed from childhood vaccines was 2001."

As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

2001 was the year the Vac Makers had to stop adding it to the majority
of vaccinations ... but obviously, it would take years to get all of
their widely advertised and distributed stock out of doctors offices,
clinics, hospitals, etc. etc. etc. etc.

Further, as Dr. Jay Gordon explains in May 2005:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-go...afety-and-a_b_...

The American Academy of Pediatrics (of which I have been a member for
a quarter century) has a very cozy relationship with the vaccine
industry. Most authors and speakers in the vaccine controversy have
been paid consultants to the vaccine industry. Most of these
researchers still accept funds while commenting on the issues.

However, even the AAP has been adamant about removing mercury from
childhood vaccines. They have failed in these efforts: The flu shot
has as much mercury preservative as any shot has ever had and, up
until a few months ago it was impossible to get a mercury-free tetanus
shot.

~~~

So thank you Myrl for your quotable propaganda and misrepresentations
of the Vaccination Industry.www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm


Ilena - You're a little manic for a Thursday. I note you have
repeated the very same post several times today. As one reader wrote
me, "Ilena's got her transmission locked in go, but has no grip on the
steering wheel, and has no idea where the brakes are. The cliff she's
about to go over, can't be far away."

First the anti-vac folks tried to blame the vaccines that caused
childhood diseases on autism. Since mercury was removed from them in
2001, autism has continued to increase in occurrence in children.

Ilena is attempting to throw up a huge smoke screen surrounding her
propaganda in that regard, turning her attention now to miniscule
amounts of mercury present in some flu vaccines.

Since it is usually the elderly, or those with health risks that get
the flu vaccine each year, how do you explain autism in children that
never received flu vaccines either???

The anti-vac tactics remind me of over-zealous prosecutors, who focus
on one murder suspect, and accuse the wrong person, and miss the real
culprit outright!

Wouldn't you folks out there who have autistic children, love to have
the anti-vac folks energies focused on possible real causes of autism
for a change???

For the record, I am against mandatory vaccination of children with
the flu vaccine. I would hope that enlightened children would avoid
the hysteria surrounding vaccines, and get the facts to make wise
choices for their children's health. Afterall, the kids are at risk,
and they can't protect themselves.

On Feb 28, 9:37*pm, Myrl wrote:


First the anti-vac folks tried to blame the vaccines that caused
childhood diseases on autism. *Since mercury was removed from them in
2001, autism has continued to increase in occurrence in children.


Myrl, why do you continue the lie that mercury was removed from
vaccines in 2001 when every one agrees that it did not begin until
2003, and even then the level of mercury was R E D U C E D not
eliminated.

Even today, children are getting mercury in their vaccines.

Even worse, pregnant mothers are and will be getting the **** in their
vaccines and the newborns will be getting it the proposed flu
vaccines.

If you are going to lie and spin the data, at least do it more
covertly. You need to go back to propaganda school and repeat course
101, " how to lie and deceive."

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus and poisons

On Feb 28, 5:59*pm, Ilena Rose wrote:


As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

2001 was the year the Vac Makers had to stop adding it to the majority
of vaccinations ... but obviously, it would take years to get all of
their widely advertised and distributed stock out of doctors offices,
clinics, hospitals, etc. etc. etc. etc.

No, it would not. even the multi-dose vaccines had expiration dates,
and surveys found that the thimerosal containing vaccines (TCVs)were
virtually gone from the shelves by late 2002.

Only the Merchants of Disease, Disability and Death still deny that
fact.

In message , Myrl wrote:

The anti-vac tactics remind me of over-zealous prosecutors, who focus
on one murder suspect, and accuse the wrong person, and miss the real
culprit outright!

Well, think of it as redoubling their efforts despite losing
sight of their goal.

--
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions ----------+

On Feb 28, 6:58*pm, Mark Probert wrote:
On Feb 28, 5:59*pm, Ilena Rose wrote:

As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

2001 was the year the Vac Makers had to stop adding it to the majority
of vaccinations ... but obviously, it would take years to get all of
their widely advertised and distributed stock out of doctors offices,
clinics, hospitals, etc. etc. etc. etc.

No, it would not. even the multi-dose vaccines had expiration dates,
and surveys found that the thimerosal containing vaccines (TCVs)were
virtually gone from the shelves by late 2002.

Only the Merchants of Disease, Disability and Death still deny that
fact.


What I find so amazing is today we watched Ilena downplay any danger
the guy using coloidal silver and turning himself monstorously blue
might be experiencing.

She further stated he could use a cleanse to get rid of the
silver. . .Geeesh, and she worries about miniscule amounts of Mercury,
in the amount no greater than what's prevalent in so called "healthy"
foods, like spinich, fish, parmesan cheese.

Talk about warped and twisted mental gymnastics to support her out of
kilter and dangerous opinions.

On Feb 28, 11:42*pm, Myrl wrote:
On Feb 28, 6:58*pm, Mark Probert wrote:





On Feb 28, 5:59*pm, Ilena Rose wrote:

As typical of Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Flacks ... she is
misrepresenting and confusing "MANUFACTURE " and "distibution" while
doing the same old silicone / vaccination shuffle.

2001 was the year the Vac Makers had to stop adding it to the majority
of vaccinations ... but obviously, it would take years to get all of
their widely advertised and distributed stock out of doctors offices,
clinics, hospitals, etc. etc. etc. etc.

No, it would not. even the multi-dose vaccines had expiration dates,
and surveys found that the thimerosal containing vaccines (TCVs)were
virtually gone from the shelves by late 2002.

Only the Merchants of Disease, Disability and Death still deny that
fact.

What I find so amazing is today we watched Ilena downplay any danger
the guy using coloidal silver and turning himself monstorously blue
might be experiencing.

She further stated he could use a cleanse to get rid of the
silver. . .

The Today show interviewed a fellow who did turn blue. He tried
cleanses, chelation, ets. and is still blue.

It is a permanent change. Looks weird.

In article ,
wrote:
On Feb 28, 9:37*pm, Myrl wrote:


First the anti-vac folks tried to blame the vaccines that caused
childhood diseases on autism. *Since mercury was removed from them in
2001, autism has continued to increase in occurrence in children.


Myrl, why do you continue the lie that mercury was removed from
vaccines in 2001 when every one agrees that it did not begin until
2003, and even then the level of mercury was R E D U C E D not
eliminated.

"Everyone" does not agree to that; the mercury was removed from the
manufacturing processes by 2001 and the stocks were gone within a
couple of years. Naturally, you're trying to move the goalposts in a
desperate attempt to explain away why autism hasn't vanished despite
the removal of the horrible, evil thimerosal.

Even today, children are getting mercury in their vaccines.

And far, far more in their tuna sandwiches.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?"
-- Bill Maher

Regarding one of the Vaccination Lies being spread wide and far that
all mercury was removed from vaccinations in 2001 ... David Kirby
addresses that myth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-...s_b_89775.html
DAVID: They stopped making mercury containing vaccines right around
the end of 2001 Now, this stuff goes and gets shipped into warehouses.
Then it gets into the pipeline, that's when the expiration date is
placed on it, the day it leaves the warehouse. They stocked up on
mercury containing vaccines as they were transitioning into the
mercury free formula. For those years, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and I'm
quite certain into 2004, a lot of this stuff was still sitting on
shelves.

In the meantime, we started giving the flu shot to pregnant women and
infant children, which still contains the full amount of mercury. We
never hit zero, and now we're back up.