8 Year Old Recovers

Brunibus wrote:


So what if the child had died ?
I suppose it would just have been 'dashed bad bit of luck' ?
It's outrageous that potentially lethal meds are handed over to 8 year-olds.

It's not like they gave the kid Tylenol...


--
RUBUS ERADICANDUS EST. MMIV Nov.

On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:50:35 -0400, "Anonymouse Unbeknownst"
wrote:



"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 28, 2004" M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
wrote in message
.net...

Good thing he took something safe and effective, not like toxic tylenol.


And it put him in the hospital for over a week. Yeah, right.


That many tylenol would have put him in the morgue.

--
_
Kevin D. Quitt 91387-4454
96.37% of all statistics are made up

"Kevin D. Quitt" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:50:35 -0400, "Anonymouse Unbeknownst"
wrote:



"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 28, 2004" M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
wrote in message
.net...

Good thing he took something safe and effective, not like toxic
tylenol.


And it put him in the hospital for over a week. Yeah, right.


That many tylenol would have put him in the morgue.


What the hell's with this Tylenol obsession, anyway? Frankly, it's
irrelevant.

As well, since when did a schoool feel it was appropriate to hand over a
large quantity of a potent drug to a young child for transport?

Considering the stupidity and irresponsibility of all the adults involved,
he's very fortunate to be alive.

Frankly, I hope the parents sue these jokers' asses off. (Not to mention the
idiot prescribing doctor who apparently turns a blind eye to this kind of
situation).