Chiropractic pediatricians - was Pen & Teller Bull**** episode guide

WHEREAS CHIROPRACTIC PEDIATRICIANS **GENTLY** MANIPULATE BABIES' NECKS

MD-OBSTETRICIANS - THE **MOST PROLIFIC** MANIPULATORS OF BABIES' NECKS - ARE
**GRUESOME** MANIPULATORS OF BABIES' NECKS (see below)...

DID PENN AND TELLER MENTION THIS?

"Anth" wrote in message
...

http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet...ller_Bull****/
Just watched the one with snails/magnets/chiropractors in it - and Stephen
Barret made a cameo appearance.
(There's no need to manipulate a babies neck, I think you lot would
agree.)
Anth



Chiropractors are GENTLE manipulators of babies' spines.


If a baby is inexplicably sick, I would take that baby to a chiropractor who
has adjusted many babies.

If I ever go back into spinal adjusting practice (unlikely) I will train
with a chiropractic pediatrician and specialize in adjusting babies.

Though there is no science - there are amazing anecdotes.

Most chiropractors who adjust babies are GENTLE.

Ask to watch the chiropractic pediatrician adjust a baby.

Did Penn and Teller - obviously interested in the safety of spinal
manipulation - mention the *most prolific manipulators* of babies' necks -
MD-obstetricians - and the fact that these MDs happen to be GRUESOME spinal
manipulators?

Did Penn and Teller mention that MD-obstetricians knowingly close birth
canals up to 30% then violently push on tiny spines (with oxytocin and
Cytotec) and/or gruesomely pull (with hands, forceps, vacuums)?

Did Penn and Teller mention that sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords?

Did they mention that some babies die, some are paralyzed for life - most
"only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched?

Did they mention that ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth
canal senselessly closed?



GENTLE chiropractic manipulation following MD-inflicted spinal manipulative
birth trauma has some parents raving about chiropractic.

Some *MDs* are manipulating spines - and reporting similar excellent
results...

Two German MDs write:

"The vertebral genesis of many functional disorders...such as dizziness,
hearing-impairment, ear-pressure, ear-pain, foreign body sensation in the
throat and dysphonia, is suggested by the success of spinal manipulative
therapy, particularly of the atlanto-occipital joint...The extraordinary
satisfaction with the manipulative therapy in 82% of patients with dizziness
(46% total relief, 36% high improvement) reflects the high efficiency of
this manual therapy...This retrospective investigation demonstrates that a
successful outcome after manual therapy is not based on a 'placebo
effect.'".
--Hulse and Holzl. HNO [Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik]. 2004 Mar;52(3):227-34.

The German physician Beidermann [1992] used spinal adjusting to treat 135
babies referred to him by a pediatric orthopedist.

Beidermann [1992] wrote that traumatization of suboccipital structures
occurs during birth, giving rise to manipulable lesions and various
conditions which he has observed to subside soon after manipulation of
those lesions. [Beidermann H. Kinematic imbalances due to suboccipital
strain in newborns. J Manual Medicine 1992;6:151-156. H. Beidermann,
M.D., Surgical Department, University of Witten-Herdecke, Schützenstrasse
9, W-5840 Schwerte, Federal Republic of Germany.]

According to Beidermann [1992], conditions which have yielded to a single
upper cervical manipulation include neonatal torticollis, opisthotonus,
asymmetric motor patterns, sleeping disorders, asymmetric development and
range of motion of the hips, fever of unknown origin, and loss of
appetite.

Beidermann reported that manipulation and physiotherapy
complement each other, with about 50% of cases requiring physiotherapy
following spinal manipulation. ("[P]hysiotherapists report consistently that
the[ir] treatment is simplified after
manipulation.")

Beidermann [1992] also stated,

"Prolonged labor and the use of extraction
aids are especially overrepresented" in cases of the syndrome he calls
kinematic imbalance due to suboccipital strain, or KISS. The birth
canal, he says, is "one of the most dangerous obstacles we ever have to
traverse."

OBs are making this dangerous obstacle MORE dangerous - but knowingly
closing birth canals.

If your baby is inexplicably sick, talk to your MD - and make sure that you
mention that MD-obstetricians are GRUESOMELY manipulatinng MOST babies
spines while knowingly closing birth canals up to 30%.

If your MD is an MD-obstetrician who uses semisitting and dorsal delivery
and she or he did not know that these positions close the birth canal - then
obviously s/he has not been *knowingly* closing birth canals.

But if s/he did not know, obviously, his or her *medical school* was
remiss/negligent.

Most medical schools *are* remiss/negligent in this regard.

If your baby is inexplicably sick...

If you gave birth on your back or butt (with your birth canal senselessly
closed up to 30%)....

Or even if you did not give birth with your birth canal senselessly
closed...

If forceps or vacuum were used - or if hands were used to pull on your
baby's spine...

Think about taking your baby to an experienced chiropractic pediatrician.

Watch a baby being adjusted - most chiropractors GENTLY adjust babies.

I suspect ALL chiropractors gently adjust babies - but no profession is
perfect.

The medical profession is the absolute WORST in this regard.

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS To any usenet pediatricians who chafe at the notion of DCs manipulating
babies' spines - FIRST chafe over in your own profession - talk to your
fellow MDs who are closing birth canals thereby GRUESOMELY manipulating most
babies' spines.

JUST THINK If there is no scientific evidence (and there isn't) that GENTLE
spinal manipulation is beneficial for babies - there *certainly* isn't any
scientific evidence that GRUESOME spinal manipulation is beneficial.

Help stop OBs from senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%.

Please ask yourselves why ANY woman should have to worry about her OB
closing
her birth canal.

KEY FACT #1: The original author of Williams Obstetrics - J Whitridge
Williams,
MD - clinically demonstrated 4 cm of anterior-posterior pelvic outlet
diameter change in 1911.

KEY FACT #2: In 1957, Borell and Fernstrom subsequently used radiography to
verify
Williams' clinical observation that the AP pelvic outlet diameter does
change at delivery - after which Russell [1969] radiographically
demonstrated
transverse pelvic outlet diameter changes...

Sometime before or after, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began LYING -
saying pelvic diameters DON'T change at delivery...

In the 70s, Ohlsen pointed out the lie and the authors of Williams
Obstetrics simply changed their lie - saying that dorsal widens...

In the 90s, I pointed out their dorsal widens lie and the correct
biomechanics.

The authors of Williams Obstetrics published the correct biomechanics
(yay!) - but they left in their text (in the same paragraph!) the dorsal
widens bald lie that caused me to contact their publisher with the correct
biomechanics!

Dorsal CLOSES - so does semisitting...

For the cites for my letters to the medical literature on the subject,
search "gastaldo td" at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi

Why are pediatricians (medical and chiropractic) remaining silent about this
grisly obstetric travesty?!

Why are MIDWIVES remaining silent?

See Rhombus of Michaelis/Midwife Jean Sutton
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2745

IT'S OBVIOUS OB CRIME...

OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring everything possible is being done to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

OBs are slicing abdomens en masse ("c-section") - surgically/fraudulently
inferring everything possible has been DONE to open birth canals - even as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

Now - to be sure - allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% is
not going to prevent all caesareans and episiotomies - but it can't hurt.

Incidentally, when babies' shoulders get stuck, OBs KEEP the birth canal
closed - even as they say they are opening it maximally.

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

OBs don't charge for their mass vagina slicing - but it is known
to increase severe perineal tears by 50X - and perineal tearing is the most
common reason for hospitalization of women:

"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm

See also: Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of Medicine
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256

Penn and Teller - with their obvious interest in spinal manipulation
safety - will no doubt be doing a special on gruesome spinal manipulation by
MD-obstetricians - including the fact that MD-obstetricians are knowingly
closing birth canals.

Then again, Penn and Teller may just be phony "skeptics"...

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo

2 wrongs don't make a right!
Anth

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
link.net...
WHEREAS CHIROPRACTIC PEDIATRICIANS **GENTLY** MANIPULATE BABIES' NECKS

MD-OBSTETRICIANS - THE **MOST PROLIFIC** MANIPULATORS OF BABIES' NECKS -
ARE
**GRUESOME** MANIPULATORS OF BABIES' NECKS (see below)...

DID PENN AND TELLER MENTION THIS?

"Anth" wrote in message
...

http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet...ller_Bull****/
Just watched the one with snails/magnets/chiropractors in it - and
Stephen
Barret made a cameo appearance.
(There's no need to manipulate a babies neck, I think you lot would
agree.)
Anth



Chiropractors are GENTLE manipulators of babies' spines.


If a baby is inexplicably sick, I would take that baby to a chiropractor
who
has adjusted many babies.

If I ever go back into spinal adjusting practice (unlikely) I will train
with a chiropractic pediatrician and specialize in adjusting babies.

Though there is no science - there are amazing anecdotes.

Most chiropractors who adjust babies are GENTLE.

Ask to watch the chiropractic pediatrician adjust a baby.

Did Penn and Teller - obviously interested in the safety of spinal
manipulation - mention the *most prolific manipulators* of babies' necks -
MD-obstetricians - and the fact that these MDs happen to be GRUESOME
spinal
manipulators?

Did Penn and Teller mention that MD-obstetricians knowingly close birth
canals up to 30% then violently push on tiny spines (with oxytocin and
Cytotec) and/or gruesomely pull (with hands, forceps, vacuums)?

Did Penn and Teller mention that sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords?

Did they mention that some babies die, some are paralyzed for life - most
"only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched?

Did they mention that ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth
canal senselessly closed?



GENTLE chiropractic manipulation following MD-inflicted spinal
manipulative
birth trauma has some parents raving about chiropractic.

Some *MDs* are manipulating spines - and reporting similar excellent
results...

Two German MDs write:

"The vertebral genesis of many functional disorders...such as dizziness,
hearing-impairment, ear-pressure, ear-pain, foreign body sensation in the
throat and dysphonia, is suggested by the success of spinal manipulative
therapy, particularly of the atlanto-occipital joint...The extraordinary
satisfaction with the manipulative therapy in 82% of patients with
dizziness
(46% total relief, 36% high improvement) reflects the high efficiency of
this manual therapy...This retrospective investigation demonstrates that a
successful outcome after manual therapy is not based on a 'placebo
effect.'".
--Hulse and Holzl. HNO [Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik]. 2004 Mar;52(3):227-34.

The German physician Beidermann [1992] used spinal adjusting to treat 135
babies referred to him by a pediatric orthopedist.

Beidermann [1992] wrote that traumatization of suboccipital structures
occurs during birth, giving rise to manipulable lesions and various
conditions which he has observed to subside soon after manipulation of
those lesions. [Beidermann H. Kinematic imbalances due to suboccipital
strain in newborns. J Manual Medicine 1992;6:151-156. H. Beidermann,
M.D., Surgical Department, University of Witten-Herdecke, Schützenstrasse
9, W-5840 Schwerte, Federal Republic of Germany.]

According to Beidermann [1992], conditions which have yielded to a single
upper cervical manipulation include neonatal torticollis, opisthotonus,
asymmetric motor patterns, sleeping disorders, asymmetric development and
range of motion of the hips, fever of unknown origin, and loss of
appetite.

Beidermann reported that manipulation and physiotherapy
complement each other, with about 50% of cases requiring physiotherapy
following spinal manipulation. ("[P]hysiotherapists report consistently
that
the[ir] treatment is simplified after
manipulation.")

Beidermann [1992] also stated,

"Prolonged labor and the use of extraction
aids are especially overrepresented" in cases of the syndrome he calls
kinematic imbalance due to suboccipital strain, or KISS. The birth
canal, he says, is "one of the most dangerous obstacles we ever have to
traverse."

OBs are making this dangerous obstacle MORE dangerous - but knowingly
closing birth canals.

If your baby is inexplicably sick, talk to your MD - and make sure that
you
mention that MD-obstetricians are GRUESOMELY manipulatinng MOST babies
spines while knowingly closing birth canals up to 30%.

If your MD is an MD-obstetrician who uses semisitting and dorsal delivery
and she or he did not know that these positions close the birth canal -
then
obviously s/he has not been *knowingly* closing birth canals.

But if s/he did not know, obviously, his or her *medical school* was
remiss/negligent.

Most medical schools *are* remiss/negligent in this regard.

If your baby is inexplicably sick...

If you gave birth on your back or butt (with your birth canal senselessly
closed up to 30%)....

Or even if you did not give birth with your birth canal senselessly
closed...

If forceps or vacuum were used - or if hands were used to pull on your
baby's spine...

Think about taking your baby to an experienced chiropractic pediatrician.

Watch a baby being adjusted - most chiropractors GENTLY adjust babies.

I suspect ALL chiropractors gently adjust babies - but no profession is
perfect.

The medical profession is the absolute WORST in this regard.

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS To any usenet pediatricians who chafe at the notion of DCs
manipulating
babies' spines - FIRST chafe over in your own profession - talk to your
fellow MDs who are closing birth canals thereby GRUESOMELY manipulating
most
babies' spines.

JUST THINK If there is no scientific evidence (and there isn't) that
GENTLE
spinal manipulation is beneficial for babies - there *certainly* isn't any
scientific evidence that GRUESOME spinal manipulation is beneficial.

Help stop OBs from senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%.

Please ask yourselves why ANY woman should have to worry about her OB
closing
her birth canal.

KEY FACT #1: The original author of Williams Obstetrics - J Whitridge
Williams,
MD - clinically demonstrated 4 cm of anterior-posterior pelvic outlet
diameter change in 1911.

KEY FACT #2: In 1957, Borell and Fernstrom subsequently used radiography
to
verify
Williams' clinical observation that the AP pelvic outlet diameter does
change at delivery - after which Russell [1969] radiographically
demonstrated
transverse pelvic outlet diameter changes...

Sometime before or after, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began LYING -
saying pelvic diameters DON'T change at delivery...

In the 70s, Ohlsen pointed out the lie and the authors of Williams
Obstetrics simply changed their lie - saying that dorsal widens...

In the 90s, I pointed out their dorsal widens lie and the correct
biomechanics.

The authors of Williams Obstetrics published the correct biomechanics
(yay!) - but they left in their text (in the same paragraph!) the dorsal
widens bald lie that caused me to contact their publisher with the correct
biomechanics!

Dorsal CLOSES - so does semisitting...

For the cites for my letters to the medical literature on the subject,
search "gastaldo td" at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi

Why are pediatricians (medical and chiropractic) remaining silent about
this
grisly obstetric travesty?!

Why are MIDWIVES remaining silent?

See Rhombus of Michaelis/Midwife Jean Sutton
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2745

IT'S OBVIOUS OB CRIME...

OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring everything possible is being done to
OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

OBs are slicing abdomens en masse ("c-section") - surgically/fraudulently
inferring everything possible has been DONE to open birth canals - even as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

Now - to be sure - allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30%
is
not going to prevent all caesareans and episiotomies - but it can't hurt.

Incidentally, when babies' shoulders get stuck, OBs KEEP the birth canal
closed - even as they say they are opening it maximally.

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

OBs don't charge for their mass vagina slicing - but it is known
to increase severe perineal tears by 50X - and perineal tearing is the
most
common reason for hospitalization of women:

"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma
to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm

See also: Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of
Medicine
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256

Penn and Teller - with their obvious interest in spinal manipulation
safety - will no doubt be doing a special on gruesome spinal manipulation
by
MD-obstetricians - including the fact that MD-obstetricians are knowingly
closing birth canals.

Then again, Penn and Teller may just be phony "skeptics"...

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo

IS YOUR BABY INEXPLICABLY SICK?

CHIROPRACTIC PEDIATRICS MAY BE THE ANSWER...

See the Biedermann quote below...

Even if your MD-obstetrician *didn't* close your birth canal up to 30% (most
OBs do this) - it might be worthwhile to ask your MD-pediatrician to refer
you to a chiropractic pediatrician... See below.

If your MD-pediatrician says babies don't need spinal manipulation, ask
him/her what he is doing to stop MD-obstetricians from GRUESOMELY
manipulating most babies' spines...


ANTH ("2 wrongs don't make a right!") indirectly exclaims acknowledgement of
the following point...

MD-obstetricians are knowingly closing birth canals up to 30% - violently
pushing on tiny spines (with oxytocin and Cytotec) - and gruesomely pulling
(with hands, forceps, vacuums)...

Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip tiny nerves out of tiny
spinal cords.

Some babies die, some are paralyzed - most "only" have their spines
gruesomely wrenched.

ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed.

When MDs and their "skeptic" lackeys (eg. Penn and Teller) criticize the
GENTLE spinal manipulation "wrong" (chiropractic) - they should at least
*mention* the GRUESOME spinal manipulation wrong (obstetrics).

Dr. DD Palmer, founder of chiropractic, wrote:

"Remember, that what a physician calls a sprain is a Chiropractic
subluxation. It persists because of slightly luxated vertebrae which
perpetuates tension." [1910:651]

There is no scientific evidence that vertebral subluxations exist and cause
disease and stop causing disease when adjusted...

GRUESOME spinal manipulation by OBs likely *causes* sprains
(subluxations)...

GENTLE spinal manipulation by the DC has been reported to *relieve* sprains
(subluxations)...

One of Anth's "wrongs" may not be all that "wrong"...

WHEN A BABY IS INEXPLICABLY SICK...

Being a doctor of chiropractic/DC myself, I am biased - but I would
definitely recommend asking your MD-pediatrician about gentle chiropractic
manipulation after birth.

If your MD-pediatrician says babies don't need spinal manipulation, ask
him/her what he is doing to stop MD-obstetricians from GRUESOMELY
manipulating most babies' spines...

PREGNANT WOMEN...

BEFORE BIRTH: Tell your MD-obstetrician you do not want him/her closing
your birth canal up to 30%.

WARNING: Some MD-obstetricians and CNMwives will let you "try" alternative
delivery positions but will move you back to semisitting or dorsal (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

TRULY BIZAR When babies' shoulders get stuck inside mom,
MD-obstetricians SAY they allow the birth canal to open maximally (an
indirect admission they are routinely closing birth canals) - but they
actually KEEP the birth canal closed!

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo



"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
link.net...
WHEREAS CHIROPRACTIC PEDIATRICIANS **GENTLY** MANIPULATE BABIES' NECKS

MD-OBSTETRICIANS - THE **MOST PROLIFIC** MANIPULATORS OF BABIES' NECKS -
ARE
**GRUESOME** MANIPULATORS OF BABIES' NECKS (see below)...

DID PENN AND TELLER MENTION THIS?

"Anth" wrote in message
...


http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet...ller_Bull****/
Just watched the one with snails/magnets/chiropractors in it - and
Stephen
Barret made a cameo appearance.
(There's no need to manipulate a babies neck, I think you lot would
agree.)
Anth



Chiropractors are GENTLE manipulators of babies' spines.


If a baby is inexplicably sick, I would take that baby to a chiropractor
who
has adjusted many babies.

If I ever go back into spinal adjusting practice (unlikely) I will train
with a chiropractic pediatrician and specialize in adjusting babies.

Though there is no science - there are amazing anecdotes.

Most chiropractors who adjust babies are GENTLE.

Ask to watch the chiropractic pediatrician adjust a baby.

Did Penn and Teller - obviously interested in the safety of spinal
manipulation - mention the *most prolific manipulators* of babies'
necks -
MD-obstetricians - and the fact that these MDs happen to be GRUESOME
spinal
manipulators?

Did Penn and Teller mention that MD-obstetricians knowingly close birth
canals up to 30% then violently push on tiny spines (with oxytocin and
Cytotec) and/or gruesomely pull (with hands, forceps, vacuums)?

Did Penn and Teller mention that sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords?

Did they mention that some babies die, some are paralyzed for life -
most
"only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched?

Did they mention that ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth
canal senselessly closed?



GENTLE chiropractic manipulation following MD-inflicted spinal
manipulative
birth trauma has some parents raving about chiropractic.

Some *MDs* are manipulating spines - and reporting similar excellent
results...

Two German MDs write:

"The vertebral genesis of many functional disorders...such as dizziness,
hearing-impairment, ear-pressure, ear-pain, foreign body sensation in
the
throat and dysphonia, is suggested by the success of spinal manipulative
therapy, particularly of the atlanto-occipital joint...The extraordinary
satisfaction with the manipulative therapy in 82% of patients with
dizziness
(46% total relief, 36% high improvement) reflects the high efficiency of
this manual therapy...This retrospective investigation demonstrates that
a
successful outcome after manual therapy is not based on a 'placebo
effect.'".
--Hulse and Holzl. HNO [Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik]. 2004 Mar;52(3):227-34.

The German physician Beidermann [1992] used spinal adjusting to treat
135
babies referred to him by a pediatric orthopedist.

Beidermann [1992] wrote that traumatization of suboccipital structures
occurs during birth, giving rise to manipulable lesions and various
conditions which he has observed to subside soon after manipulation of
those lesions. [Beidermann H. Kinematic imbalances due to suboccipital
strain in newborns. J Manual Medicine 1992;6:151-156. H. Beidermann,
M.D., Surgical Department, University of Witten-Herdecke,
Schützenstrasse
9, W-5840 Schwerte, Federal Republic of Germany.]

According to Beidermann [1992], conditions which have yielded to a
single
upper cervical manipulation include neonatal torticollis, opisthotonus,
asymmetric motor patterns, sleeping disorders, asymmetric development
and
range of motion of the hips, fever of unknown origin, and loss of
appetite.

Beidermann reported that manipulation and physiotherapy
complement each other, with about 50% of cases requiring physiotherapy
following spinal manipulation. ("[P]hysiotherapists report consistently
that
the[ir] treatment is simplified after
manipulation.")

Beidermann [1992] also stated,

"Prolonged labor and the use of extraction
aids are especially overrepresented" in cases of the syndrome he calls
kinematic imbalance due to suboccipital strain, or KISS. The birth
canal, he says, is "one of the most dangerous obstacles we ever have to
traverse."

OBs are making this dangerous obstacle MORE dangerous - but knowingly
closing birth canals.

If your baby is inexplicably sick, talk to your MD - and make sure that
you
mention that MD-obstetricians are GRUESOMELY manipulatinng MOST babies
spines while knowingly closing birth canals up to 30%.

If your MD is an MD-obstetrician who uses semisitting and dorsal
delivery
and she or he did not know that these positions close the birth canal -
then
obviously s/he has not been *knowingly* closing birth canals.

But if s/he did not know, obviously, his or her *medical school* was
remiss/negligent.

Most medical schools *are* remiss/negligent in this regard.

If your baby is inexplicably sick...

If you gave birth on your back or butt (with your birth canal
senselessly
closed up to 30%)....

Or even if you did not give birth with your birth canal senselessly
closed...

If forceps or vacuum were used - or if hands were used to pull on your
baby's spine...

Think about taking your baby to an experienced chiropractic
pediatrician.

Watch a baby being adjusted - most chiropractors GENTLY adjust babies.

I suspect ALL chiropractors gently adjust babies - but no profession is
perfect.

The medical profession is the absolute WORST in this regard.

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS To any usenet pediatricians who chafe at the notion of DCs
manipulating
babies' spines - FIRST chafe over in your own profession - talk to your
fellow MDs who are closing birth canals thereby GRUESOMELY manipulating
most
babies' spines.

JUST THINK If there is no scientific evidence (and there isn't) that
GENTLE
spinal manipulation is beneficial for babies - there *certainly* isn't
any
scientific evidence that GRUESOME spinal manipulation is beneficial.

Help stop OBs from senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%.

Please ask yourselves why ANY woman should have to worry about her OB
closing
her birth canal.

KEY FACT #1: The original author of Williams Obstetrics - J Whitridge
Williams,
MD - clinically demonstrated 4 cm of anterior-posterior pelvic outlet
diameter change in 1911.

KEY FACT #2: In 1957, Borell and Fernstrom subsequently used
radiography
to
verify
Williams' clinical observation that the AP pelvic outlet diameter does
change at delivery - after which Russell [1969] radiographically
demonstrated
transverse pelvic outlet diameter changes...

Sometime before or after, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began
LYING -
saying pelvic diameters DON'T change at delivery...

In the 70s, Ohlsen pointed out the lie and the authors of Williams
Obstetrics simply changed their lie - saying that dorsal widens...

In the 90s, I pointed out their dorsal widens lie and the correct
biomechanics.

The authors of Williams Obstetrics published the correct biomechanics
(yay!) - but they left in their text (in the same paragraph!) the dorsal
widens bald lie that caused me to contact their publisher with the
correct
biomechanics!

Dorsal CLOSES - so does semisitting...

For the cites for my letters to the medical literature on the subject,
search "gastaldo td" at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi

Why are pediatricians (medical and chiropractic) remaining silent about
this
grisly obstetric travesty?!

Why are MIDWIVES remaining silent?

See Rhombus of Michaelis/Midwife Jean Sutton
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2745

IT'S OBVIOUS OB CRIME...

OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring everything possible is being done to
OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

OBs are slicing abdomens en masse ("c-section") -
surgically/fraudulently
inferring everything possible has been DONE to open birth canals - even
as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

Now - to be sure - allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to
30%
is
not going to prevent all caesareans and episiotomies - but it can't
hurt.

Incidentally, when babies' shoulders get stuck, OBs KEEP the birth canal
closed - even as they say they are opening it maximally.

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

OBs don't charge for their mass vagina slicing - but it is known
to increase severe perineal tears by 50X - and perineal tearing is the
most
common reason for hospitalization of women:

"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma
to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm

See also: Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of
Medicine
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256

Penn and Teller - with their obvious interest in spinal manipulation
safety - will no doubt be doing a special on gruesome spinal
manipulation
by
MD-obstetricians - including the fact that MD-obstetricians are
knowingly
closing birth canals.

Then again, Penn and Teller may just be phony "skeptics"...

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo