If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Choice for Men Entertainment
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... aren't you 2 idiots done, yet? Do you need to make it a threesom? |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Choice for Men Entertainment
" krp -" wrote in message news:1quYe.4071$yN1.3338@trnddc03... wrote in message oups.com... I think there is a rather large difference between lynching and consentual sex. In your instance, a person is a victim of unwanted violence. In the instance of Pam and Frank, Frank consented to having sex with Pam, and neglected to utilize birth control, placing the responsibility with Pam. We are discussing an act in which both people willfully participate, in which both people are aware that there are repurcussions if they fail to protect themselves. That's a far cry from lynching. Since PAM is the only one of the two who CAN get pregnant, logically doesn't the primary responsibility fall on her? Since she has SOLE and ABSOLUTE control over any result of the recreational intercourse, then it should stand to reason that she bear the same ABSOLUTE responsibility for the results. Since the law of the land is essentially that she can terminate any product of the night's activities with Frank having absolutely NO say in the mater, or she can place the child for adoption WITHOUT Frank's consent, or she can have the child. In short she reaps ALL the legal benes and HE gets to PAY..................................... What does that sound like? It sounds like the condemned not only having to dig his own grave, but being forced to purchase the gravesite and rent the shovel. |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Choice for Men Entertainment
"AndBlankets01" wrote in message news:Rhfbf.3828$HB.2942@dukeread12... " krp -" wrote in message news:1quYe.4071$yN1.3338@trnddc03... wrote in message oups.com... I think there is a rather large difference between lynching and consentual sex. In your instance, a person is a victim of unwanted violence. In the instance of Pam and Frank, Frank consented to having sex with Pam, and neglected to utilize birth control, placing the responsibility with Pam. We are discussing an act in which both people willfully participate, in which both people are aware that there are repurcussions if they fail to protect themselves. That's a far cry from lynching. Since PAM is the only one of the two who CAN get pregnant, logically doesn't the primary responsibility fall on her? Since she has SOLE and ABSOLUTE control over any result of the recreational intercourse, then it should stand to reason that she bear the same ABSOLUTE responsibility for the results. Since the law of the land is essentially that she can terminate any product of the night's activities with Frank having absolutely NO say in the mater, or she can place the child for adoption WITHOUT Frank's consent, or she can have the child. In short she reaps ALL the legal benes and HE gets to PAY..................................... What does that sound like? Kind of like a Cha Cha Cha I would think. Maybe by the Tito Puente band. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Choice for Men Entertainment | Kingsley G. Morse Jr. (Delete the D) | Child Support | 2 | March 19th 05 04:52 PM |
Choice for Men Entertainment | Delete the D | Child Support | 0 | March 19th 04 10:55 AM |
Choice for Men Entertainment | Delete the D | Child Support | 2 | February 19th 04 05:17 PM |
Choice for Men Entertainment | Delete the D | Child Support | 0 | October 19th 03 10:55 AM |
Choice for Men Entertainment | Delete the D | Child Support | 0 | September 19th 03 10:55 AM |