If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
ALBUQUERQUE - A grand jury has indicted a woman accused of pretending
she'd had a child and bilking her former husband out of more than $26,000. The Bernalillo County grand jury last week indicted Viola Trevino, 54, on 24 counts, including kidnapping, perjury, conspiracy to commit fraud and conspiracy to commit forgery. Trevino and Steve Barreras divorced in August 1999. The divorce papers make no mention of a pregnancy or minor children. However, in December 1999, Trevino sued for child support, saying she gave birth to Barreras' child that September. The elaborate scheme to get child support included false DNA evidence, a forged Social Security number and forged birth and baptismal certificates, authorities have said. They say it came apart in December 2004, when a judge ordered her to bring the child to court. According to court records, Trevino picked up a 2-year-old and her grandmother from a city street, promising them lunch, $50 and a visit to Santa Claus. Trevino then took the child to court, alleging she was her daughter. However, state District Judge Linda Vanzi ruled Trevino had fabricated the baby she claimed Barreras fathered. Trevino had a tubal ligation in 1978 and Barreras had a vasectomy in 1998, court records show. Last October, Trevino was sentenced to 16 months in prison after pleading guilty to making a false federal income tax return. The U.S. attorney's office said the 2001 tax return included falsely claimed exemptions, Earned Income Credit, and child and dependent care expenses for a nonexistent child. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place
was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
$26,000 Fraud Scam, tax evasion, and an assortment otherfelonies and all she
gets is16 months? "SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
On May 3, 12:23 pm, "DB" wrote:
$26,000 Fraud Scam, tax evasion, and an assortment otherfelonies and all she gets is16 months? "SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I'm sure that she won't have to pay the money back...you know...hmmm... If these idiots at the CSE offices did their job, the would've known years ago... No different than that little girl that had died years before the father found out and the mom continued to collect CS...hmmm...But I'm sure, the women will all claim these are "isolated" incidents... I knew someone who was married...they had a child together...after two years, the mom disappeared from Texas...months later called that she was with her new boyfriend...for over 3 years the Dad fully supported his son, had his mother take care of the baby as much as possible...eventually hired a nanny, as he was in the military...Well, sure enough, he eventually also fell in love with the nanny... that's when things changes...mom came back asking for her child...Dad said no way, so she took him to court...What did the courts do? Well, of course they were not happy, but at the point mom saw she could not win, she told them all that the baby was NOT her ex-husband's baby...yes, the kiddo he had raised was not his...soooo...the courts gave the child to the mother...and the father could no longer have access to the child because he was not the bio father...too bad...so sad...but because he was on the birth certificate, he had to pay support with no rights to see him...mom moved the child to Oklahoma... last I heard, her new live in boyfriend was actually the baby's father... Go figure...great laws we have in this country to protect children...no, they are there to protect stupid women...period. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
SpiderHam77 wrote:
Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well. Not that he would have requested access to a child he knew did not exist, but actually he did. He spent a couple of years I believe trying to get the courts to listen to him and force the mother to produce the child. So when the courts finally agree to do so, she goes and snatches one off the street. And this is just the child support. We aren't even talking about the spousal support she attempted to defraud him of. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
whatamess wrote:
On May 3, 12:23 pm, "DB" wrote: $26,000 Fraud Scam, tax evasion, and an assortment otherfelonies and all she gets is16 months? "SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I'm sure that she won't have to pay the money back...you know...hmmm... If these idiots at the CSE offices did their job, the would've known years ago... No different than that little girl that had died years before the father found out and the mom continued to collect CS...hmmm...But I'm sure, the women will all claim these are "isolated" incidents... Even, arguemendo, that this is an isolated incident--and the level of chutzpah and deception is remarkable--consider what this says. Child Support Enforcement claims that it is working in the best interest of the child. How do you represent somebody's best interests when you don't even see them--let alone talk to them--in the first place. And keep in mind they are not like elected representatives; they are assigned cases with individuals. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
"SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well. That's because.................. women never lie. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
"whatamess" wrote in message oups.com... On May 3, 12:23 pm, "DB" wrote: $26,000 Fraud Scam, tax evasion, and an assortment otherfelonies and all she gets is16 months? "SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I'm sure that she won't have to pay the money back...you know...hmmm... If these idiots at the CSE offices did their job, the would've known years ago... How do you know they DIDN'T know? No different than that little girl that had died years before the father found out and the mom continued to collect CS...hmmm...But I'm sure, the women will all claim these are "isolated" incidents... I knew someone who was married...they had a child together...after two years, the mom disappeared from Texas...months later called that she was with her new boyfriend...for over 3 years the Dad fully supported his son, had his mother take care of the baby as much as possible...eventually hired a nanny, as he was in the military...Well, sure enough, he eventually also fell in love with the nanny... that's when things changes...mom came back asking for her child...Dad said no way, so she took him to court...What did the courts do? Well, of course they were not happy, but at the point mom saw she could not win, she told them all that the baby was NOT her ex-husband's baby...yes, the kiddo he had raised was not his...soooo...the courts gave the child to the mother...and the father could no longer have access to the child because he was not the bio father...too bad...so sad...but because he was on the birth certificate, he had to pay support with no rights to see him...mom moved the child to Oklahoma... last I heard, her new live in boyfriend was actually the baby's father... Go figure...great laws we have in this country to protect children...no, they are there to protect stupid women...period. More aptly, they are there to protect WICKED women and to harm men and children. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
"John Meyer" wrote in message . .. whatamess wrote: On May 3, 12:23 pm, "DB" wrote: $26,000 Fraud Scam, tax evasion, and an assortment otherfelonies and all she gets is16 months? "SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Wow, quite the story there... What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I'm sure that she won't have to pay the money back...you know...hmmm... If these idiots at the CSE offices did their job, the would've known years ago... No different than that little girl that had died years before the father found out and the mom continued to collect CS...hmmm...But I'm sure, the women will all claim these are "isolated" incidents... Even, arguemendo, that this is an isolated incident--and the level of chutzpah and deception is remarkable--consider what this says. Child Support Enforcement claims that it is working in the best interest of the child. How do you represent somebody's best interests when you don't even see them--let alone talk to them--in the first place. And keep in mind they are not like elected representatives; they are assigned cases with individuals. They are nothing more than paper pushers with one sole agenda: transfer the wealth from the hard workers to the lazy! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Woman indicted in alleged scheme to get child support
On May 3, 2:21�pm, whatamess wrote:
On May 3, 12:23 pm, "DB" wrote: $26,000 Fraud Scam, tax evasion, and an assortment otherfelonies and all she gets is16 months? "SpiderHam77" wrote in message oups.com... *Wow, quite the story there... *What I find odd in the first place was the fact that no one had actually laid eyes on this child from the start... That the dad never requested access to the child... Extt... Hmm.. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I'm sure that she won't have to pay the money back...you know...hmmm... If these idiots at the CSE offices did their job, the would've known years ago... No different than that little girl that had died years before the father found out and the mom continued to collect CS...hmmm...But I'm sure, the women will all claim these are "isolated" incidents... I knew someone who was married...they had a child together...after two years, the mom disappeared from Texas...months later called that she was with her new boyfriend...for over 3 years the Dad fully supported his son, had his mother take care of the baby as much as possible...eventually hired a nanny, as he was in the military...Well, sure enough, he eventually also fell in love with the nanny... that's when things changes...mom came back asking for her child...Dad said no way, so she took him to court...What did the courts do? *Well, of course they were not happy, but at the point mom saw she could not win, she told them all that the baby was NOT her ex-husband's baby...yes, the kiddo he had raised was not his...soooo...the courts gave the child to the mother...and the father could no longer have access to the child because he was not the bio father...too bad...so sad...but because he was on the birth certificate, he had to pay support with no rights to see him...mom moved the child to Oklahoma... last I heard, her new live in boyfriend was actually the baby's father... Go figure...great laws we have in this country to protect children...no, they are there to protect stupid women...period. A negative DNA test would end support. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another butt*uckin fostie indicted | Microfirm News Server | Foster Parents | 12 | October 24th 06 01:51 AM |
Fostiess indicted for murdering infant girl | Jodi Schremmer | Foster Parents | 1 | September 13th 06 01:57 PM |
IL: Woman Wants Semen Donor To Pay Child Support | Dusty | Child Support | 15 | June 13th 06 08:13 PM |
Looking for man paying or woman recieving highest support. | Billie Barger | Child Support | 1 | July 9th 05 03:20 AM |
Constitutional Challenge to N.Y. Child support scheme | DLove | Child Support | 1 | August 6th 04 07:47 AM |